Digital Pharmacist-Physician Collaborative Care Management of Hypertension for Medicare Patients.

IF 4.2 2区 医学 Q1 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Eboni G Price-Haywood, Susan Olet, Savita D Singh, Jeffrey Burton
{"title":"Digital Pharmacist-Physician Collaborative Care Management of Hypertension for Medicare Patients.","authors":"Eboni G Price-Haywood, Susan Olet, Savita D Singh, Jeffrey Burton","doi":"10.1007/s11606-025-09823-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Hypertension is a major driver of healthcare costs. Remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) combined with team-based chronic disease care management can improve blood pressure (BP) control and reduce risk of high-cost cardiovascular events.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To examine whether a pharmacist-led Digital Medicine program improves BP control, medication adherence, healthcare utilization, and cost of care among racial subpopulations of Medicare patients.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Retrospective single-institution observational study conducted between January 1, 2019, and October 15, 2023.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Medicare patients with hypertension enrolled in the intervention with ≥ 3 office-based BP readings within 6-month periods pre- and post-index event and their propensity score-matched controls.</p><p><strong>Intervention: </strong>Remote pharmacist-physician collaborative care employing RPM with lifestyle, medication, and care gap management.</p><p><strong>Main measures: </strong>Primary outcome was BP control (office-based). Secondary outcomes were medication adherence, service utilization, and cost of care. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months using difference-in-difference (DID) approach stratified by race.</p><p><strong>Key results: </strong>A total of 5057 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, Black patients had lower proportions of BP control. By 18 months, intervention compared to controls had higher rates of BP control (Digital-Medicine vs control, Proportion [95%CI]: Black, 0.761[0.728, 0.795] vs. 0.687 [0.654, 0.721]; White, 0.777 [0.755, 0.799] vs. 0.727 [0.704, 0.750]) and greater reductions in average SBP (DID, mmHg [95%CI]: Black, - 1.74 [- 3.18, - 0.29]; White, - 3.22 [- 4.22, - 2.23]) across racial subgroups. Differences in average DBP reductions were only significant for White patients (DID: Black, - 0.45 [- 1.23, 0.32]; White, - 1.48 [- 2.02, - 0.95]). Intervention compared to controls had higher odds of medication adherence, lower rates of inpatient and emergency department utilization, and no significant changes in primary care visits. Minimal changes in cost were observed.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Remote pharmacist-led care management increased BP control across racial subpopulations and improved medication adherence and acute care service utilization.</p>","PeriodicalId":15860,"journal":{"name":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":4.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of General Internal Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-025-09823-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Hypertension is a major driver of healthcare costs. Remote physiologic monitoring (RPM) combined with team-based chronic disease care management can improve blood pressure (BP) control and reduce risk of high-cost cardiovascular events.

Objective: To examine whether a pharmacist-led Digital Medicine program improves BP control, medication adherence, healthcare utilization, and cost of care among racial subpopulations of Medicare patients.

Design: Retrospective single-institution observational study conducted between January 1, 2019, and October 15, 2023.

Participants: Medicare patients with hypertension enrolled in the intervention with ≥ 3 office-based BP readings within 6-month periods pre- and post-index event and their propensity score-matched controls.

Intervention: Remote pharmacist-physician collaborative care employing RPM with lifestyle, medication, and care gap management.

Main measures: Primary outcome was BP control (office-based). Secondary outcomes were medication adherence, service utilization, and cost of care. Outcomes were assessed at baseline, 3, 6, 12, and 18 months using difference-in-difference (DID) approach stratified by race.

Key results: A total of 5057 patients were included in the analysis. At baseline, Black patients had lower proportions of BP control. By 18 months, intervention compared to controls had higher rates of BP control (Digital-Medicine vs control, Proportion [95%CI]: Black, 0.761[0.728, 0.795] vs. 0.687 [0.654, 0.721]; White, 0.777 [0.755, 0.799] vs. 0.727 [0.704, 0.750]) and greater reductions in average SBP (DID, mmHg [95%CI]: Black, - 1.74 [- 3.18, - 0.29]; White, - 3.22 [- 4.22, - 2.23]) across racial subgroups. Differences in average DBP reductions were only significant for White patients (DID: Black, - 0.45 [- 1.23, 0.32]; White, - 1.48 [- 2.02, - 0.95]). Intervention compared to controls had higher odds of medication adherence, lower rates of inpatient and emergency department utilization, and no significant changes in primary care visits. Minimal changes in cost were observed.

Conclusion: Remote pharmacist-led care management increased BP control across racial subpopulations and improved medication adherence and acute care service utilization.

医疗保险患者高血压的数字化药师-医师协同护理管理。
背景:高血压是医疗保健费用的主要驱动因素。远程生理监测(RPM)结合基于团队的慢性病护理管理可以改善血压(BP)控制并降低高成本心血管事件的风险。目的:研究药剂师主导的数字医学项目是否能改善种族亚群医疗保险患者的血压控制、药物依从性、医疗保健利用和护理成本。设计:在2019年1月1日至2023年10月15日期间进行回顾性单机构观察性研究。参与者:参与干预的医疗保险高血压患者,在指数事件前后6个月内血压读数≥3次,以及倾向评分匹配的对照组。干预:远程药剂师-医生合作护理采用RPM与生活方式,药物,和护理差距管理。主要指标:主要指标为血压控制(基于办公室)。次要结果是药物依从性、服务利用率和护理费用。在基线、3、6、12和18个月采用按种族分层的差异中差(DID)方法评估结果。主要结果:共有5057例患者被纳入分析。在基线时,黑人患者的血压控制比例较低。到18个月时,干预组与对照组相比,不同种族亚组的血压控制率更高(数字医学组与对照组,比例[95%CI]:黑人,0.761[0.728,0.795]对0.687[0.654,0.721];白人,0.777[0.755,0.799]对0.727[0.704,0.750]),平均收缩压降低幅度更大(DID, mmHg [95%CI]:黑人,- 1.74[- 3.18,- 0.29];白人,- 3.22[- 4.22,- 2.23])。平均舒张压降低的差异仅在白人患者中显著(DID:黑人,- 0.45[- 1.23,0.32];白人,- 1.48[- 2.02,- 0.95])。与对照组相比,干预组的药物依从性更高,住院和急诊使用率更低,初级保健就诊没有显著变化。观察到的成本变化很小。结论:远程药剂师主导的护理管理增加了种族亚群的血压控制,提高了药物依从性和急性护理服务的利用率。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of General Internal Medicine
Journal of General Internal Medicine 医学-医学:内科
CiteScore
7.70
自引率
5.30%
发文量
749
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of General Internal Medicine is the official journal of the Society of General Internal Medicine. It promotes improved patient care, research, and education in primary care, general internal medicine, and hospital medicine. Its articles focus on topics such as clinical medicine, epidemiology, prevention, health care delivery, curriculum development, and numerous other non-traditional themes, in addition to classic clinical research on problems in internal medicine.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信