Right Ventricular Septal Pacing-Derived V6 R-Wave Peak Time Predicts Successful Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block.

IF 2.6 3区 医学 Q2 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Mengxing Cai, Zhongli Chen, Yun Tang, Yuan Gao, Sijin Wu, Nan Xu, Xuan Ma, Jiandu Yang, Chongqiang Li, Xiahenazi Aiyasiding, Xiaojian Chi, Yan Dai, Shihua Zhao, Keping Chen
{"title":"Right Ventricular Septal Pacing-Derived V<sub>6</sub> R-Wave Peak Time Predicts Successful Left Bundle Branch Area Pacing in Patients With Heart Failure and Left Bundle Branch Block.","authors":"Mengxing Cai, Zhongli Chen, Yun Tang, Yuan Gao, Sijin Wu, Nan Xu, Xuan Ma, Jiandu Yang, Chongqiang Li, Xiahenazi Aiyasiding, Xiaojian Chi, Yan Dai, Shihua Zhao, Keping Chen","doi":"10.1111/jce.70110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging strategy for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but its implementation in heart failure patients remains challenging. This study aimed to assess whether the initial V<sub>6</sub> R-wave peak time (V<sub>6</sub>RWPT) during right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) for lead localization can predict successful LBBAP implantation.</p><p><strong>Methods and results: </strong>Consecutive patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% who met CRT indications were included. Clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic variables were collected. Among 99 patients enrolled in the study, the success rates for LBBAP and LBBP were 73.7% and 63.6%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that baseline Strauss LBBB (OR:5.04, 95% CI:1.45-17.54, p = 0.011) and shorter RVSP V<sub>6</sub>RWPT (per 10 ms, OR:0.42, 95% CI:0.29-0.59, p < 0.001) had a greater likelihood of successful LBBAP. RVSP V<sub>6</sub>RWPT (cutoff: 145 ms) yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC:0.888), significantly outperforming LVEDD (AUC:0.721), LAD (AUC:0.709), baseline Strauss LBBB (AUC:0.694), and baseline QRSd (AUC:0.629) (all p < 0.01). Among 56 patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, RVSP V<sub>6</sub>RWPT correlated significantly with both global (r = 0.592, p < 0.001) and septal scar percentages (r = 0.598, p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>V<sub>6</sub>RWPT during RVSP is a novel predictor of successful LBBAP implantation in heart failure patients with LBBB. This marker demonstrates strong predictive value and correlates with cardiac scar burden. The RVSP V<sub>6</sub>RWPT assessment dynamically guides CRT strategy optimization during implantation.</p>","PeriodicalId":15178,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jce.70110","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) is an emerging strategy for cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), but its implementation in heart failure patients remains challenging. This study aimed to assess whether the initial V6 R-wave peak time (V6RWPT) during right ventricular septal pacing (RVSP) for lead localization can predict successful LBBAP implantation.

Methods and results: Consecutive patients with left bundle branch block (LBBB) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) < 50% who met CRT indications were included. Clinical, echocardiographic, and electrocardiographic variables were collected. Among 99 patients enrolled in the study, the success rates for LBBAP and LBBP were 73.7% and 63.6%, respectively. Multivariate regression analysis revealed that baseline Strauss LBBB (OR:5.04, 95% CI:1.45-17.54, p = 0.011) and shorter RVSP V6RWPT (per 10 ms, OR:0.42, 95% CI:0.29-0.59, p < 0.001) had a greater likelihood of successful LBBAP. RVSP V6RWPT (cutoff: 145 ms) yielded the highest area under the curve (AUC:0.888), significantly outperforming LVEDD (AUC:0.721), LAD (AUC:0.709), baseline Strauss LBBB (AUC:0.694), and baseline QRSd (AUC:0.629) (all p < 0.01). Among 56 patients who underwent cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, RVSP V6RWPT correlated significantly with both global (r = 0.592, p < 0.001) and septal scar percentages (r = 0.598, p < 0.001).

Conclusion: V6RWPT during RVSP is a novel predictor of successful LBBAP implantation in heart failure patients with LBBB. This marker demonstrates strong predictive value and correlates with cardiac scar burden. The RVSP V6RWPT assessment dynamically guides CRT strategy optimization during implantation.

右室间隔起搏衍生的V6 r波峰值时间预测心力衰竭和左束支传导阻滞患者左束支区域起搏成功。
左束分支区域起搏(LBBAP)是一种新兴的心脏再同步化治疗(CRT)策略,但其在心力衰竭患者中的实施仍然具有挑战性。本研究旨在评估右室间隔起搏(RVSP)导联定位时起始V6 r波峰值时间(V6RWPT)能否预测LBBAP植入成功。方法与结果:连续出现左束支传导阻滞(LBBB)和左室射血分数(LVEF) 6RWPT(每10 ms, OR:0.42, 95% CI:0.29-0.59, p6rwpt(截止时间:145 ms)的患者曲线下面积最高(AUC:0.888),显著优于LVEDD (AUC:0.721)、LAD (AUC:0.709)、基线Strauss LBBB (AUC:0.694)和基线QRSd (AUC:0.629)(所有p6rwpt与两者均有显著相关性(r = 0.592, p)。RVSP期间的V6RWPT是LBBB心衰患者LBBAP植入成功的一个新的预测指标。该标志物具有很强的预测价值,并与心脏疤痕负荷相关。RVSP V6RWPT评估动态指导植入过程中的CRT策略优化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
14.80%
发文量
433
审稿时长
3-6 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology (JCE) keeps its readership well informed of the latest developments in the study and management of arrhythmic disorders. Edited by Bradley P. Knight, M.D., and a distinguished international editorial board, JCE is the leading journal devoted to the study of the electrophysiology of the heart.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信