Laughing Through the Myths: Using Satirical Humor to Counter Misinformation About Contraceptives on Social Media.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q1 COMMUNICATION
Ellen Droog, Christian Burgers, Dian van Huijstee, Ivar Vermeulen
{"title":"Laughing Through the Myths: Using Satirical Humor to Counter Misinformation About Contraceptives on Social Media.","authors":"Ellen Droog, Christian Burgers, Dian van Huijstee, Ivar Vermeulen","doi":"10.1080/10410236.2025.2560034","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The rise of health-related misinformation on social media has caused many young women to shift from hormonal methods to natural contraceptive options. This study examines the effectiveness of satirical corrections in countering misinformation about contraceptives on TikTok. A total of 678 Dutch-speaking women aged 18-35, either watched TikTok videos containing misinformation about contraception followed by (1) no correction, (2) a non-humorous correction, or (3) a satirical correction, or (4) were in a control group that saw no misinformation or correction. Misinformation exposure (vs. control) did not significantly affect beliefs or attitudes toward contraception. However, both non-humorous and satirical corrections (vs. control and no correction) successfully reduced misperceptions and favorable attitudes toward natural contraception. Nonetheless, neither correction method consistently improved acceptance of true claims or attitudes toward hormonal contraception. This suggests that, while corrections can effectively challenge misinformed health beliefs, they may not necessarily foster trust in accurate health information.</p>","PeriodicalId":12889,"journal":{"name":"Health Communication","volume":" ","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Communication","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2025.2560034","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The rise of health-related misinformation on social media has caused many young women to shift from hormonal methods to natural contraceptive options. This study examines the effectiveness of satirical corrections in countering misinformation about contraceptives on TikTok. A total of 678 Dutch-speaking women aged 18-35, either watched TikTok videos containing misinformation about contraception followed by (1) no correction, (2) a non-humorous correction, or (3) a satirical correction, or (4) were in a control group that saw no misinformation or correction. Misinformation exposure (vs. control) did not significantly affect beliefs or attitudes toward contraception. However, both non-humorous and satirical corrections (vs. control and no correction) successfully reduced misperceptions and favorable attitudes toward natural contraception. Nonetheless, neither correction method consistently improved acceptance of true claims or attitudes toward hormonal contraception. This suggests that, while corrections can effectively challenge misinformed health beliefs, they may not necessarily foster trust in accurate health information.

笑破迷思:用讽刺幽默来反击社交媒体上关于避孕药的错误信息。
社交媒体上与健康相关的错误信息的增加导致许多年轻女性从激素避孕方法转向自然避孕选择。本研究考察了讽刺更正在打击TikTok上关于避孕药的错误信息方面的有效性。共有678名年龄在18-35岁之间说荷兰语的女性观看了含有避孕错误信息的TikTok视频,然后(1)没有纠正,(2)非幽默的纠正,或(3)讽刺的纠正,或(4)没有看到错误信息或纠正的对照组。错误信息暴露(对照)没有显著影响对避孕的信念或态度。然而,非幽默和讽刺的纠正(对照对照和不纠正)都成功地减少了对自然避孕的误解和有利态度。尽管如此,这两种矫正方法都不能始终如一地提高人们对激素避孕的真实主张或态度的接受度。这表明,虽然纠正可以有效地挑战错误的健康观念,但它们可能不一定能促进对准确健康信息的信任。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.20
自引率
10.30%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: As an outlet for scholarly intercourse between medical and social sciences, this noteworthy journal seeks to improve practical communication between caregivers and patients and between institutions and the public. Outstanding editorial board members and contributors from both medical and social science arenas collaborate to meet the challenges inherent in this goal. Although most inclusions are data-based, the journal also publishes pedagogical, methodological, theoretical, and applied articles using both quantitative or qualitative methods.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信