Andrew Auerbach, Katie Raffel, Irit R Rasooly, Jeffrey Schnipper
{"title":"Diagnostic excellence: turning to diagnostic performance improvement.","authors":"Andrew Auerbach, Katie Raffel, Irit R Rasooly, Jeffrey Schnipper","doi":"10.1515/dx-2025-0107","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The field of diagnostic excellence has advanced considerably in the past decade, reframing diagnosis as a patient safety priority and highlighting the prevalence and harms of diagnostic error. Foundational evidence now supports the development of Diagnostic Excellence Programs; organizational initiatives designed to reduce diagnostic errors and improve system-level and individual performance. While early studies established the epidemiology of diagnostic error across inpatient, emergency, and ambulatory care, newer approaches emphasize continuous, systematic surveillance to inform targeted improvements. Emerging frameworks, such as the DEER Taxonomy and root cause or success cause analyses, help classify drivers of both failures and successes in diagnostic processes. Effective programs must address system factors, including electronic health record design, workload, team structures, and communication, while also enhancing individual clinician performance through feedback, diagnostic reflection, cross-checks, and coaching. Patient engagement represents a critical but underdeveloped dimension; strategies such as structured communication frameworks, patient-family advisory councils, and electronic tools co-designed with patients aim to foster shared diagnostic decision-making and improve transparency. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise to accelerate measurement, streamline clinical workflows, reduce cognitive load, and support communication, though careful implementation and oversight are required to ensure safety. Ultimately, Diagnostic Excellence Programs will succeed by embedding diagnostic safety into institutional standards of care, providing clinicians with ongoing, psychologically safe opportunities for recalibration, and leveraging AI to scale surveillance and improvement activities.</p>","PeriodicalId":11273,"journal":{"name":"Diagnosis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diagnosis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/dx-2025-0107","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The field of diagnostic excellence has advanced considerably in the past decade, reframing diagnosis as a patient safety priority and highlighting the prevalence and harms of diagnostic error. Foundational evidence now supports the development of Diagnostic Excellence Programs; organizational initiatives designed to reduce diagnostic errors and improve system-level and individual performance. While early studies established the epidemiology of diagnostic error across inpatient, emergency, and ambulatory care, newer approaches emphasize continuous, systematic surveillance to inform targeted improvements. Emerging frameworks, such as the DEER Taxonomy and root cause or success cause analyses, help classify drivers of both failures and successes in diagnostic processes. Effective programs must address system factors, including electronic health record design, workload, team structures, and communication, while also enhancing individual clinician performance through feedback, diagnostic reflection, cross-checks, and coaching. Patient engagement represents a critical but underdeveloped dimension; strategies such as structured communication frameworks, patient-family advisory councils, and electronic tools co-designed with patients aim to foster shared diagnostic decision-making and improve transparency. Artificial intelligence (AI) holds promise to accelerate measurement, streamline clinical workflows, reduce cognitive load, and support communication, though careful implementation and oversight are required to ensure safety. Ultimately, Diagnostic Excellence Programs will succeed by embedding diagnostic safety into institutional standards of care, providing clinicians with ongoing, psychologically safe opportunities for recalibration, and leveraging AI to scale surveillance and improvement activities.
期刊介绍:
Diagnosis focuses on how diagnosis can be advanced, how it is taught, and how and why it can fail, leading to diagnostic errors. The journal welcomes both fundamental and applied works, improvement initiatives, opinions, and debates to encourage new thinking on improving this critical aspect of healthcare quality. Topics: -Factors that promote diagnostic quality and safety -Clinical reasoning -Diagnostic errors in medicine -The factors that contribute to diagnostic error: human factors, cognitive issues, and system-related breakdowns -Improving the value of diagnosis – eliminating waste and unnecessary testing -How culture and removing blame promote awareness of diagnostic errors -Training and education related to clinical reasoning and diagnostic skills -Advances in laboratory testing and imaging that improve diagnostic capability -Local, national and international initiatives to reduce diagnostic error