Investigating Socioeconomic Disparities in Park Access Across Two Southeastern US Cities Using a Unique Park Metric: An Ecological Analysis.

IF 2.4 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Andrew T Kaczynski, Marilyn E Wende, Jasper Schipperijn, S Morgan Hughey, Ellen W Stowe, J Aaron Hipp, Farnaz Hesam Shariati, Mohammad Javad Koohsari
{"title":"Investigating Socioeconomic Disparities in Park Access Across Two Southeastern US Cities Using a Unique Park Metric: An Ecological Analysis.","authors":"Andrew T Kaczynski, Marilyn E Wende, Jasper Schipperijn, S Morgan Hughey, Ellen W Stowe, J Aaron Hipp, Farnaz Hesam Shariati, Mohammad Javad Koohsari","doi":"10.1177/08901171251380848","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>PurposeThis study aimed to demonstrate how ParkIndex values can be used to examine issues related to composite park access, and to investigate whether ParkIndex scores for block groups were significantly different by income, race/ethnicity, and population density.DesignCross-sectional, environmental justice analysis of spatial disparities.SettingGreenville County, South Carolina, and Raleigh, North Carolina.SubjectsPark access and quality data were collected for a total of 507 block groups across the study setting.MeasuresFor all study block groups, we empirically derived a multi-dimensional park access metric called ParkIndex representing the probability of park use based on three park availability and quality indicators. Block group median household income, race/ethnicity, and population density were obtained from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey.AnalysisChoropleth maps were used to juxtapose ParkIndex values and neighborhood sociodemographic attributes. Analysis of variance was conducted to examine differences in ParkIndex values by multiple sociodemographic variables.ResultsNo significant differences in ParkIndex values were found by median household income (F = 0.15,<i>P</i> = .86), percent non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity (F = 0.22,<i>P</i> = .80), or population density (F = 0.70,<i>P</i> = .50).ConclusionThe current study contributes to the fast-growing body of literature examining whether access to quality parks is equitably distributed in diverse locations. Future research can investigate the utility and generalizability of this composite metric to identify and mitigate potential environmental injustices and health disparities.</p>","PeriodicalId":7481,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Health Promotion","volume":" ","pages":"8901171251380848"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Health Promotion","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08901171251380848","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study aimed to demonstrate how ParkIndex values can be used to examine issues related to composite park access, and to investigate whether ParkIndex scores for block groups were significantly different by income, race/ethnicity, and population density.DesignCross-sectional, environmental justice analysis of spatial disparities.SettingGreenville County, South Carolina, and Raleigh, North Carolina.SubjectsPark access and quality data were collected for a total of 507 block groups across the study setting.MeasuresFor all study block groups, we empirically derived a multi-dimensional park access metric called ParkIndex representing the probability of park use based on three park availability and quality indicators. Block group median household income, race/ethnicity, and population density were obtained from the US Census Bureau's American Community Survey.AnalysisChoropleth maps were used to juxtapose ParkIndex values and neighborhood sociodemographic attributes. Analysis of variance was conducted to examine differences in ParkIndex values by multiple sociodemographic variables.ResultsNo significant differences in ParkIndex values were found by median household income (F = 0.15,P = .86), percent non-Hispanic White race/ethnicity (F = 0.22,P = .80), or population density (F = 0.70,P = .50).ConclusionThe current study contributes to the fast-growing body of literature examining whether access to quality parks is equitably distributed in diverse locations. Future research can investigate the utility and generalizability of this composite metric to identify and mitigate potential environmental injustices and health disparities.

使用独特的公园指标调查美国东南部两个城市公园通道的社会经济差异:生态学分析。
本研究旨在证明ParkIndex值如何用于检查与复合公园通道相关的问题,并调查ParkIndex得分是否因收入、种族/民族和人口密度而显著不同。设计空间差异横断面、环境正义分析。设置南卡罗来纳州的格林维尔县和北卡罗来纳州的罗利。在整个研究设置中,共收集了507个分组的SubjectsPark访问和质量数据。对于所有研究街区组,我们基于三个公园可用性和质量指标,经验推导出一个多维公园访问度量,称为ParkIndex,代表公园使用的概率。街区组家庭收入中位数、种族/民族和人口密度来自美国人口普查局的美国社区调查。使用AnalysisChoropleth地图并置ParkIndex值和社区社会人口统计学属性。方差分析通过多个社会人口变量来检验ParkIndex值的差异。结果家庭收入中位数(F = 0.15,P = 0.86)、非西班牙裔白人种族/民族百分比(F = 0.22,P = 0.80)和人口密度(F = 0.70,P = 0.50)对ParkIndex值无显著影响。目前的研究有助于快速增长的研究质量公园是否公平分布在不同地点的文献。未来的研究可以调查这种复合指标的效用和普遍性,以识别和减轻潜在的环境不公正和健康差距。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
American Journal of Health Promotion
American Journal of Health Promotion PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
184
期刊介绍: The editorial goal of the American Journal of Health Promotion is to provide a forum for exchange among the many disciplines involved in health promotion and an interface between researchers and practitioners.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信