Resection of the posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior cervical decompression surgery: a retrospective study of the clinical and radiographic outcomes in Thailand.

IF 2.7 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Nattawut Niljianskul, Padungcharn Nivatpumin
{"title":"Resection of the posterior longitudinal ligament in anterior cervical decompression surgery: a retrospective study of the clinical and radiographic outcomes in Thailand.","authors":"Nattawut Niljianskul, Padungcharn Nivatpumin","doi":"10.31616/asj.2025.0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Study design: </strong>Retrospective study.</p><p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression surgery with and without resecting the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL).</p><p><strong>Overview of literature: </strong>Resection of the PLL during anterior cervical decompression surgery is still a controversial topic among spine surgeons.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>All patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression surgery from October 2018 to December 2023 were included in this cohort. The PLL was preserved in patients with cervical spondylosis with only axial neck pain, cervical spine injuries with an intact PLL and intervertebral disc, PLL ossification with double layer signs on magnetic resonance imaging studies, and cervical spine metastasis. Clinical outcomes were used to evaluate the visual analog scale for neck pain and a modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Radiographs were used to evaluate the device-level Cobb angle (CA), segmental CA, global CA, and sagittal vertical axis, and they were compared with postoperative measurements at 1 year.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 102 patients underwent surgical intervention. In 36 patients, PLL was preserved. The retractor time was shorter in the non-PLL resection group and was statistically significant (p=0.046). The non-PLL resection group had fewer complications, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.787). Both clinical and radiographic outcomes were improved after surgery, and there were no statistically significant outcome differences between the resection and non-resection groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Resecting the PLL in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery may prolong retractor time and could potentially result in postoperative complications. However, it does not significantly affect radiographic outcomes regarding cervical spine alignment compared to patients where the PLL was not cut.</p>","PeriodicalId":8555,"journal":{"name":"Asian Spine Journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Spine Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31616/asj.2025.0134","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Study design: Retrospective study.

Purpose: To compare clinical and radiographic outcomes of patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression surgery with and without resecting the posterior longitudinal ligament (PLL).

Overview of literature: Resection of the PLL during anterior cervical decompression surgery is still a controversial topic among spine surgeons.

Methods: All patients undergoing anterior cervical decompression surgery from October 2018 to December 2023 were included in this cohort. The PLL was preserved in patients with cervical spondylosis with only axial neck pain, cervical spine injuries with an intact PLL and intervertebral disc, PLL ossification with double layer signs on magnetic resonance imaging studies, and cervical spine metastasis. Clinical outcomes were used to evaluate the visual analog scale for neck pain and a modified Japanese Orthopedic Association score. Radiographs were used to evaluate the device-level Cobb angle (CA), segmental CA, global CA, and sagittal vertical axis, and they were compared with postoperative measurements at 1 year.

Results: A total of 102 patients underwent surgical intervention. In 36 patients, PLL was preserved. The retractor time was shorter in the non-PLL resection group and was statistically significant (p=0.046). The non-PLL resection group had fewer complications, but this was not statistically significant (p=0.787). Both clinical and radiographic outcomes were improved after surgery, and there were no statistically significant outcome differences between the resection and non-resection groups.

Conclusions: Resecting the PLL in patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery may prolong retractor time and could potentially result in postoperative complications. However, it does not significantly affect radiographic outcomes regarding cervical spine alignment compared to patients where the PLL was not cut.

切除颈椎前路减压手术中的后纵韧带:泰国临床和影像学结果的回顾性研究。
研究设计:回顾性研究。目的:比较颈椎前路减压手术切除和不切除后纵韧带(PLL)患者的临床和影像学结果。文献综述:颈椎前路减压手术中PLL的切除在脊柱外科医生中仍然是一个有争议的话题。方法:2018年10月至2023年12月接受颈椎前路减压手术的所有患者均纳入该队列。颈椎病仅伴有轴向颈痛、颈椎损伤伴PLL和椎间盘完整、磁共振成像显示PLL骨化伴双层征、颈椎转移的患者均保留PLL。临床结果用于评估颈部疼痛的视觉模拟量表和修改的日本骨科协会评分。x线片用于评估器械水平的Cobb角(CA)、节段性CA、全局CA和矢状垂直轴,并与术后1年的测量结果进行比较。结果:102例患者接受了手术干预。36例患者切除了PLL。非pll切除组牵开时间较短,差异有统计学意义(p=0.046)。非pll切除术组并发症较少,但差异无统计学意义(p=0.787)。手术后临床和影像学结果均有改善,切除组和非切除组的结果无统计学差异。结论:颈椎前路手术患者切除前锁环可能会延长牵开时间,并可能导致术后并发症。然而,与未切除PLL的患者相比,它对颈椎对齐的放射学结果没有显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Asian Spine Journal
Asian Spine Journal ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
4.30%
发文量
108
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信