Discrepancies between current displayed and auto-logged glucose values in FreeStyle Libre 3: Implications for clinical interpretation.

IF 5.7 2区 医学 Q1 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Lilian Witthauer, Camilo Mendez, José Garcia-Tirado, Manuel Eichenlaub, Delia Waldenmaier, Stefan Pleus, Guido Freckmann
{"title":"Discrepancies between current displayed and auto-logged glucose values in FreeStyle Libre 3: Implications for clinical interpretation.","authors":"Lilian Witthauer, Camilo Mendez, José Garcia-Tirado, Manuel Eichenlaub, Delia Waldenmaier, Stefan Pleus, Guido Freckmann","doi":"10.1111/dom.70140","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Aims: </strong>The FreeStyle Libre 3 (FSL3) continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system provides both auto-logged glucose values (AL) and current displayed glucose values (CUR). These values are often assumed to be interchangeable; however, discrepancies and their clinical relevance remain underexplored.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>Data from a 15-day study in 24 study participants wearing FSL3 were analysed, including three in-clinic sessions with glycaemic excursions during which CUR values were retrieved every 15 min by study personnel. Paired AL and CUR readings were compared using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) calculations. Display errors defined as instances where the app showed an error message instead of a CUR value were analysed using linear mixed-effects models to assess associations with glucose level and rate of change (RoC).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>CUR values were comparable to AL in general (mean difference: -1.2 ± 6.4 mg/dL), but slightly lower in the hypoglycaemic range. Discrepancies exceeding ±10 mg/dL occurred in about 10% of cases. MARD was comparable between AL (9.7%) and CUR (10.1%), with greater deviation in hypoglycaemia. Display errors (3.9%) occurred more often at higher glucose levels (mean AL difference: +91.9 mg/dL) and during rapid fluctuations (mean absolute RoC difference: +1.52 mg/dL/min; both p < 0.001).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although differences between AL and CUR were generally small, they were systematic and more pronounced in critical contexts like hypoglycaemia and rapid glucose change. Recognising these patterns may improve CGM data interpretation and alignment between user actions, provider decisions, and automated systems. These differences can reclassify readings across clinical thresholds, affecting patient-clinician alignment despite small average biases.</p>","PeriodicalId":158,"journal":{"name":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/dom.70140","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aims: The FreeStyle Libre 3 (FSL3) continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) system provides both auto-logged glucose values (AL) and current displayed glucose values (CUR). These values are often assumed to be interchangeable; however, discrepancies and their clinical relevance remain underexplored.

Materials and methods: Data from a 15-day study in 24 study participants wearing FSL3 were analysed, including three in-clinic sessions with glycaemic excursions during which CUR values were retrieved every 15 min by study personnel. Paired AL and CUR readings were compared using descriptive statistics, Wilcoxon signed-rank tests, and mean absolute relative difference (MARD) calculations. Display errors defined as instances where the app showed an error message instead of a CUR value were analysed using linear mixed-effects models to assess associations with glucose level and rate of change (RoC).

Results: CUR values were comparable to AL in general (mean difference: -1.2 ± 6.4 mg/dL), but slightly lower in the hypoglycaemic range. Discrepancies exceeding ±10 mg/dL occurred in about 10% of cases. MARD was comparable between AL (9.7%) and CUR (10.1%), with greater deviation in hypoglycaemia. Display errors (3.9%) occurred more often at higher glucose levels (mean AL difference: +91.9 mg/dL) and during rapid fluctuations (mean absolute RoC difference: +1.52 mg/dL/min; both p < 0.001).

Conclusions: Although differences between AL and CUR were generally small, they were systematic and more pronounced in critical contexts like hypoglycaemia and rapid glucose change. Recognising these patterns may improve CGM data interpretation and alignment between user actions, provider decisions, and automated systems. These differences can reclassify readings across clinical thresholds, affecting patient-clinician alignment despite small average biases.

当前显示和自动记录的血糖值在FreeStyle Libre 3中的差异:对临床解释的影响。
目的:FreeStyle Libre 3 (FSL3)连续血糖监测(CGM)系统提供自动记录的血糖值(AL)和当前显示的血糖值(CUR)。这些值通常被认为是可互换的;然而,差异及其临床相关性仍未得到充分探讨。材料和方法:对24名佩戴FSL3的研究参与者进行为期15天的研究数据进行分析,包括3次临床血糖漂移,期间研究人员每15分钟检索一次CUR值。使用描述性统计、Wilcoxon符号秩检验和平均绝对相对差(MARD)计算比较配对AL和CUR读数。显示错误被定义为应用程序显示错误信息而不是CUR值的实例,使用线性混合效应模型分析,以评估与葡萄糖水平和变化率(RoC)的关联。结果:一般情况下,CUR值与AL相当(平均差值:-1.2±6.4 mg/dL),但在低血糖范围内略低。差异超过±10mg /dL的病例约占10%。MARD在AL(9.7%)和CUR(10.1%)之间具有可比性,在低血糖方面偏差较大。显示错误(3.9%)更常发生在血糖水平较高时(平均AL差值:+91.9 mg/dL)和快速波动时(平均绝对RoC差值:+1.52 mg/dL/min)。结论:尽管AL和CUR之间的差异通常很小,但在低血糖和血糖快速变化等关键情况下,它们是系统性的,且更为明显。认识到这些模式可以改进CGM数据的解释和用户操作、提供者决策和自动化系统之间的一致性。这些差异可以跨临床阈值重新分类读数,影响患者-临床医师对齐,尽管平均偏差很小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism
Diabetes, Obesity & Metabolism 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
6.90%
发文量
319
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism is primarily a journal of clinical and experimental pharmacology and therapeutics covering the interrelated areas of diabetes, obesity and metabolism. The journal prioritises high-quality original research that reports on the effects of new or existing therapies, including dietary, exercise and lifestyle (non-pharmacological) interventions, in any aspect of metabolic and endocrine disease, either in humans or animal and cellular systems. ‘Metabolism’ may relate to lipids, bone and drug metabolism, or broader aspects of endocrine dysfunction. Preclinical pharmacology, pharmacokinetic studies, meta-analyses and those addressing drug safety and tolerability are also highly suitable for publication in this journal. Original research may be published as a main paper or as a research letter.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信