Pupillary dynamics as a marker of acute cannabis inhalation.

IF 3.3
Ashley Brooks-Russell, Suneeta Godbole, Michael J Kosnett, Sarah Limbacher, Prem S Subramanian, Timothy Brown, Julia Wrobel
{"title":"Pupillary dynamics as a marker of acute cannabis inhalation.","authors":"Ashley Brooks-Russell, Suneeta Godbole, Michael J Kosnett, Sarah Limbacher, Prem S Subramanian, Timothy Brown, Julia Wrobel","doi":"10.1080/15563650.2025.2543066","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Acute cannabis use has been found to affect pupil size and pupillary dynamics. Law enforcement may consider ocular changes in their examinations to determine drug impairment and the source, including from cannabis. A limited number of studies have used pupillometer technology to provide an objective measure of pupillary changes associated with cannabis use. The purpose of the study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of pupil size and dynamics, measured with a pupillometer, associated with recent cannabis inhalation.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Participants (<i>n</i> = 126) completed a pupillometer assessment, using the NeurOptics PLR-3000 at three times. Of the 126 participants, 95 completed assessments at baseline, and at 40 min and 100 min following 15 min of <i>ad libitum</i> inhalation of self-provided cannabis flower or concentrate products. Thirty-one participants completed the same assessments without using cannabis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated for pupil size and dynamics measures associated with recent cannabis use versus no use, for both post-use time points. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models were used to identify the combination of ocular metrics that were most predictive and parsimonious.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Following cannabis use, the pupillary measure with the highest area under the curve was percent change in pupil size, which decreased after cannabis use, with an area under the curve of 0.73 at 40 min and 0.75 at 100 min following cannabis use. Considering variables together in a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model did not meaningfully improve prediction over individual measures.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Consistent with some prior studies, we did not find that cannabis use was associated with substantial and consistent change in the maximum pupil size (measured in darkness) relative to controls. However, diminished pupil dynamics, such as constriction in response to light and recovery dilation, were more predictive of recent cannabis use, consistent with limited prior studies.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Pupillary dynamics, when measured with an objective test, may contribute to providing an indication of recent cannabis inhalation.</p>","PeriodicalId":520593,"journal":{"name":"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","volume":" ","pages":"1-9"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical toxicology (Philadelphia, Pa.)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15563650.2025.2543066","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Acute cannabis use has been found to affect pupil size and pupillary dynamics. Law enforcement may consider ocular changes in their examinations to determine drug impairment and the source, including from cannabis. A limited number of studies have used pupillometer technology to provide an objective measure of pupillary changes associated with cannabis use. The purpose of the study was to examine the sensitivity and specificity of pupil size and dynamics, measured with a pupillometer, associated with recent cannabis inhalation.

Methods: Participants (n = 126) completed a pupillometer assessment, using the NeurOptics PLR-3000 at three times. Of the 126 participants, 95 completed assessments at baseline, and at 40 min and 100 min following 15 min of ad libitum inhalation of self-provided cannabis flower or concentrate products. Thirty-one participants completed the same assessments without using cannabis. Sensitivity, specificity and accuracy were calculated for pupil size and dynamics measures associated with recent cannabis use versus no use, for both post-use time points. Least absolute shrinkage and selection operator models were used to identify the combination of ocular metrics that were most predictive and parsimonious.

Results: Following cannabis use, the pupillary measure with the highest area under the curve was percent change in pupil size, which decreased after cannabis use, with an area under the curve of 0.73 at 40 min and 0.75 at 100 min following cannabis use. Considering variables together in a least absolute shrinkage and selection operator model did not meaningfully improve prediction over individual measures.

Discussion: Consistent with some prior studies, we did not find that cannabis use was associated with substantial and consistent change in the maximum pupil size (measured in darkness) relative to controls. However, diminished pupil dynamics, such as constriction in response to light and recovery dilation, were more predictive of recent cannabis use, consistent with limited prior studies.

Conclusions: Pupillary dynamics, when measured with an objective test, may contribute to providing an indication of recent cannabis inhalation.

瞳孔动态 作为急性大麻吸入的标志。
简介:急性大麻使用已被发现影响瞳孔大小和瞳孔动力学。执法部门在检查时可考虑眼部变化,以确定药物损害及其来源,包括大麻。有限数量的研究使用了瞳孔计技术,以提供与大麻使用有关的瞳孔变化的客观测量。该研究的目的是检查瞳孔大小和动态的敏感性和特异性,用瞳孔计测量,与最近的大麻吸入有关。方法:参与者(n = 126)完成瞳孔计评估,使用NeurOptics PLR-3000三次。在126名参与者中,95名在基线、40分钟和100分钟完成了评估,这些评估是在自由吸入自供大麻花或浓缩产品15分钟后完成的。31名参与者在不使用大麻的情况下完成了同样的评估。在两个使用后时间点,计算了瞳孔大小和与近期使用大麻与未使用大麻相关的动态测量的敏感性、特异性和准确性。最小绝对收缩和选择算子模型被用来确定最具预测性和最节俭的眼部指标的组合。结果:使用大麻后,瞳孔曲线下面积最大的瞳孔测量是瞳孔尺寸变化百分比,使用大麻后瞳孔尺寸变化百分比减小,在使用大麻后40 min曲线下面积为0.73,100 min曲线下面积为0.75。在最小绝对收缩和选择算子模型中一起考虑变量并没有显着提高对单个措施的预测。讨论:与先前的一些研究一致,我们没有发现大麻的使用与相对于对照组的最大瞳孔大小(在黑暗中测量)的实质性和一致性变化有关。然而,瞳孔动态减弱,如对光线的反应收缩和恢复性扩张,更能预测最近使用大麻,这与有限的先前研究一致。结论:瞳孔动态,当用客观测试测量时,可能有助于提供近期大麻吸入的指征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信