How is trauma-informed care conceptualised in UK mental health services? Systematic scoping review protocol.

NIHR open research Pub Date : 2025-05-19 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.3310/nihropenres.13945.1
Ma Lourdes Casingcasing, Gary Winship, Nuria Segarra, Sarah Beach, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone
{"title":"How is trauma-informed care conceptualised in UK mental health services? Systematic scoping review protocol.","authors":"Ma Lourdes Casingcasing, Gary Winship, Nuria Segarra, Sarah Beach, Stefan Rennick-Egglestone","doi":"10.3310/nihropenres.13945.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Trauma-informed care (TIC) has attracted considerable attention globally as a framework for addressing the profound impacts of trauma on individuals and communities. Despite its widespread adoption, the definition and operationalisation of TIC remain inconsistent across contexts, including the United Kingdom. TIC represents a systemic shift in healthcare and social care practices, moving from a focus on immediate issues to addressing the underlying effects of violence, childhood adversity, and trauma. This approach is particularly pertinent in the UK, where there is growing interest in TIC across the health, social care, and criminal justice sectors.This systematic scoping review aims to shed light on how TIC is defined and applied in the UK. By synthesising existing literature, it seeks to clarify the conceptualisation of TIC, identify gaps in implementation, and contribute to ongoing efforts to standardise trauma-informed approaches. The review is motivated by the UK's proactive yet fragmented adoption of TIC, as evidenced by recent initiatives and sector-specific adaptations. By examining these developments, the review aims to inform policy and practice, ultimately enhancing the delivery of trauma-informed care in the UK.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We systematically searched for primary studies in PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Medline to explore how TIC is defined in the UK. Grey documents that described TIC principles, evaluation, and implementation within mental health care services in the UK were selected. Data from selected studies and grey documents, including handbooks, policies, or training materials, were systematically extracted, focusing on the document characteristics, TIC principles, implementation strategies and evaluation methods. Studies were then selected in English from the last 15 years of work, focusing on TIC practices within the mental health care system in the UK. Data were then analysed to describe TIC principles within mental health care services, identify important concepts of TIC and explore implementation and evaluation methods. This would enable us to understand the broader components of how TIC is defined.</p><p><strong>Ethics and dissemination: </strong>This systematic scoping review did not require ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in academic journals specialising in mental health, trauma, and healthcare management, conference presentations, online platforms such as the research team's website, social media channels, community organisations, advocacy groups, or patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":74312,"journal":{"name":"NIHR open research","volume":"5 ","pages":"47"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12438948/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NIHR open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/nihropenres.13945.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Trauma-informed care (TIC) has attracted considerable attention globally as a framework for addressing the profound impacts of trauma on individuals and communities. Despite its widespread adoption, the definition and operationalisation of TIC remain inconsistent across contexts, including the United Kingdom. TIC represents a systemic shift in healthcare and social care practices, moving from a focus on immediate issues to addressing the underlying effects of violence, childhood adversity, and trauma. This approach is particularly pertinent in the UK, where there is growing interest in TIC across the health, social care, and criminal justice sectors.This systematic scoping review aims to shed light on how TIC is defined and applied in the UK. By synthesising existing literature, it seeks to clarify the conceptualisation of TIC, identify gaps in implementation, and contribute to ongoing efforts to standardise trauma-informed approaches. The review is motivated by the UK's proactive yet fragmented adoption of TIC, as evidenced by recent initiatives and sector-specific adaptations. By examining these developments, the review aims to inform policy and practice, ultimately enhancing the delivery of trauma-informed care in the UK.

Methods: We systematically searched for primary studies in PsycINFO, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), and Medline to explore how TIC is defined in the UK. Grey documents that described TIC principles, evaluation, and implementation within mental health care services in the UK were selected. Data from selected studies and grey documents, including handbooks, policies, or training materials, were systematically extracted, focusing on the document characteristics, TIC principles, implementation strategies and evaluation methods. Studies were then selected in English from the last 15 years of work, focusing on TIC practices within the mental health care system in the UK. Data were then analysed to describe TIC principles within mental health care services, identify important concepts of TIC and explore implementation and evaluation methods. This would enable us to understand the broader components of how TIC is defined.

Ethics and dissemination: This systematic scoping review did not require ethical approval. The findings will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications in academic journals specialising in mental health, trauma, and healthcare management, conference presentations, online platforms such as the research team's website, social media channels, community organisations, advocacy groups, or patients.

在英国心理健康服务中,创伤知情护理是如何概念化的?系统范围审查协议。
引言:创伤知情护理(TIC)作为解决创伤对个人和社区的深刻影响的框架,在全球引起了相当大的关注。尽管它被广泛采用,但在包括英国在内的不同背景下,TIC的定义和运作仍然不一致。TIC代表了医疗保健和社会护理实践的系统性转变,从关注眼前问题转向解决暴力、童年逆境和创伤的潜在影响。这种方法在英国尤其适用,在那里,卫生、社会保健和刑事司法部门对TIC的兴趣日益浓厚。这个系统的范围审查旨在阐明在英国如何定义和应用TIC。通过综合现有文献,它试图澄清TIC的概念,确定实施中的差距,并为正在进行的标准化创伤知情方法的努力做出贡献。此次审查的动机是英国积极而零碎地采用TIC,最近的举措和针对特定行业的调整证明了这一点。通过检查这些发展,审查旨在为政策和实践提供信息,最终加强英国创伤知情护理的提供。方法:我们系统地检索了PsycINFO、护理和相关健康文献累积索引(CINAHL)和Medline的初步研究,以探讨TIC在英国是如何定义的。选择了描述TIC原则、评估和在英国精神卫生保健服务中实施的灰色文件。从选定的研究和灰色文件(包括手册、政策或培训材料)中系统地提取数据,重点研究文件特征、TIC原则、实施策略和评估方法。然后从过去15年的工作中选择英语研究,重点关注英国精神卫生保健系统中的TIC实践。然后对数据进行分析,以描述精神卫生保健服务中的TIC原则,确定TIC的重要概念,并探索实施和评估方法。这将使我们能够了解如何定义议会投资的更广泛组成部分。伦理和传播:该系统的范围审查不需要伦理批准。研究结果将通过精神健康、创伤和医疗管理专业学术期刊上的同行评审出版物、会议演讲、研究团队网站等在线平台、社交媒体渠道、社区组织、倡导团体或患者进行传播。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信