Real-World Outcomes of Baricitinib Monotherapy Versus csDMARD Combination Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A SingleCenter Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Drug Retention.

IF 1.1 Q4 RHEUMATOLOGY
Mete Kara, Gülay Alp, Haluk Cinakli
{"title":"Real-World Outcomes of Baricitinib Monotherapy Versus csDMARD Combination Therapy in Rheumatoid Arthritis: A SingleCenter Retrospective Analysis of Efficacy, Safety, and Drug Retention.","authors":"Mete Kara, Gülay Alp, Haluk Cinakli","doi":"10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.11131","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Background/Aims: This study compared the effectiveness, adverse effects (AEs), and drug retention rates of baricitinib (BARI) monotherapy versus combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective observational study, 140 RA patients were analyzed, with 50 receiving monotherapy and 90 receiving BARI combination therapy. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatment details, and AEs were recorded. Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups, including disease activity, assessed by the Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints with C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), as well as functional status and drug survival. Results: Baricitinib monotherapy and BARI combination groups had similar baseline characteristics. Both groups showed significant improvements in disease activity, with no difference in final DAS28-CRP, SDAI, or CDAI scores. A higher proportion of BARI monotherapy patients achieved low disease activity on SDAI and CDAI. Adverse effects rates were similar between groups, though serious AEs were slightly more common in combination therapy (P = .044). This study found no significant difference in drug survival between monotherapy and combination therapy. In multivariate analysis, higher initial steroid dosage (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.149, P = .030), prior use of 2 or more biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (HR = 2.825, P = .002), and younger age (HR = 0.957, P = .001) were significant predictors of BARI treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: This study suggests that BARI monotherapy offers comparable efficacy, safety, and retention to the BARI combination in RA treatment. It provides an effective alternative for patients who find it inconvenient to use conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.</p>","PeriodicalId":93884,"journal":{"name":"Archives of rheumatology","volume":"40 3","pages":"279-287"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12502854/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5152/ArchRheumatol.2025.11131","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background/Aims: This study compared the effectiveness, adverse effects (AEs), and drug retention rates of baricitinib (BARI) monotherapy versus combination therapy in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients. Materials and Methods: In this single-center retrospective observational study, 140 RA patients were analyzed, with 50 receiving monotherapy and 90 receiving BARI combination therapy. Demographics, disease characteristics, treatment details, and AEs were recorded. Clinical outcomes were compared between the groups, including disease activity, assessed by the Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints with C-reactive Protein (DAS28-CRP), Simplified Disease Activity Index (SDAI), and Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), as well as functional status and drug survival. Results: Baricitinib monotherapy and BARI combination groups had similar baseline characteristics. Both groups showed significant improvements in disease activity, with no difference in final DAS28-CRP, SDAI, or CDAI scores. A higher proportion of BARI monotherapy patients achieved low disease activity on SDAI and CDAI. Adverse effects rates were similar between groups, though serious AEs were slightly more common in combination therapy (P = .044). This study found no significant difference in drug survival between monotherapy and combination therapy. In multivariate analysis, higher initial steroid dosage (hazard ratio (HR) = 1.149, P = .030), prior use of 2 or more biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (HR = 2.825, P = .002), and younger age (HR = 0.957, P = .001) were significant predictors of BARI treatment discontinuation. Conclusion: This study suggests that BARI monotherapy offers comparable efficacy, safety, and retention to the BARI combination in RA treatment. It provides an effective alternative for patients who find it inconvenient to use conventional synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Baricitinib单药治疗与csDMARD联合治疗在类风湿关节炎中的实际结果:疗效、安全性和药物保留的单中心回顾性分析
背景/目的:本研究比较了baricitinib (BARI)单药治疗与联合治疗对类风湿关节炎(RA)患者的疗效、不良反应(ae)和药物保留率。材料与方法:在这项单中心回顾性观察研究中,分析了140例RA患者,其中50例接受单一治疗,90例接受BARI联合治疗。记录人口统计学、疾病特征、治疗细节和不良反应。比较两组之间的临床结果,包括疾病活动性,用28个关节的c反应蛋白疾病活动性评分(DAS28-CRP)、简化疾病活动性指数(SDAI)和临床疾病活动性指数(CDAI)评估疾病活动性,以及功能状态和药物生存期。结果:Baricitinib单药组和BARI联合治疗组具有相似的基线特征。两组疾病活动度均有显著改善,最终DAS28-CRP、SDAI或CDAI评分无差异。BARI单药治疗患者在SDAI和CDAI中达到低疾病活动度的比例较高。两组不良反应发生率相似,但严重不良反应在联合治疗中更为常见(P = 0.044)。本研究发现单药治疗和联合治疗的药物生存期无显著差异。在多变量分析中,较高的初始类固醇剂量(HR) = 1.149, P =。030),既往使用2种或2种以上生物疾病缓解抗风湿药物(HR = 2.825, P = 2.825)。002),年龄越小(HR = 0.957, P =。001)是BARI治疗停止的重要预测因子。结论:本研究表明,BARI单药治疗在RA治疗中具有与BARI联合治疗相当的疗效、安全性和保留性。它提供了一个有效的替代患者谁发现不方便使用传统的合成疾病缓解抗风湿药物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信