Evaluation of area based socioeconomic inequalities and neonatal mortality rates in France: national population based study.

IF 10
BMJ medicine Pub Date : 2025-09-16 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000954
Victor Sartorius, Héloïse Torchin, Luc Gaulard, Marianne Philibert, Victoria Butler, Monica Saucedo, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Jeanne Fresson, Jennifer Zeitlin
{"title":"Evaluation of area based socioeconomic inequalities and neonatal mortality rates in France: national population based study.","authors":"Victor Sartorius, Héloïse Torchin, Luc Gaulard, Marianne Philibert, Victoria Butler, Monica Saucedo, Catherine Deneux-Tharaux, Jeanne Fresson, Jennifer Zeitlin","doi":"10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000954","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Abstract: </strong></p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>To investigate the magnitude and evolution of inequalities in neonatal mortality rates by using area based socioeconomic indices in France.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>National population based study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>For 2015-20, data from the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). For 2001-08, neonatal death certificates and aggregate vital statistics data by municipality of residence.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Live births with a gestational age ≥22 completed weeks to a mother residing in metropolitan France, 2015-20 (4 293 403 live births and 10 869 neonatal deaths), compared with a 2001-08 study (6 202 918 live births and 14 851 neonatal deaths).</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Differences in neonatal mortality rate (death before day 28 of life) according to the socioeconomic characteristics of the mother's municipality of residence. Comparison with data from a 2001-08 study to assess changes in socioeconomic inequalities and their contribution to the increase in neonatal mortality rate.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The neonatal mortality rate was 2.53 per 1000 live births in 2015-20. Five indicators, previously associated with perinatal mortality, were combined into a perinatal French deprivation index (P-FDep) for the main analysis. P-FDep was categorised into five equal groups (deprivation groups 1-5) for comparison with other research and into 10 equal groups (deprivation groups 1-10) for more granular analyses, with group 1 being the least and group 5 (or group 10) the most deprived group. The rate in the most deprived compared with the least deprived group for P-FDep was 1.71 (95% confidence interval 1.60 to 1.83) times higher, based on the analysis of deprivation groups 1-5. A mortality gradient existed across the groups, translating into 2496 excess deaths (23.3%) when the rate in the least deprived group was applied to all areas. The gradient was more marked when deprivation groups 1-10 were used (relative risk 1.88, 95% CI 1.71 to 2.07 for the highest to the lowest deprived group). Compared with 2001-08 (neonatal mortality rate 2.39 per 1000), the rate remained constant in the least deprived areas, but worsened in the most deprived areas (+10.1% and +11.7% for groups 4 and 5, respectively), increasing the relative risks between the highest and lowest groups, which were 1.54 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.62) for deprivation groups 1-5 and 1.67 (1.55 to 1.79) for deprivation groups 1-10, in 2001-08.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In this study, the socioeconomic level of the mother's place of residence was strongly associated with the neonatal mortality rate. The data showed that inequalities have widened, contributing to the increase in the neonatal mortality rate.</p>","PeriodicalId":72433,"journal":{"name":"BMJ medicine","volume":"4 1","pages":"e000954"},"PeriodicalIF":10.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439131/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjmed-2024-000954","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the magnitude and evolution of inequalities in neonatal mortality rates by using area based socioeconomic indices in France.

Design: National population based study.

Setting: For 2015-20, data from the French National Health Data System (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS). For 2001-08, neonatal death certificates and aggregate vital statistics data by municipality of residence.

Participants: Live births with a gestational age ≥22 completed weeks to a mother residing in metropolitan France, 2015-20 (4 293 403 live births and 10 869 neonatal deaths), compared with a 2001-08 study (6 202 918 live births and 14 851 neonatal deaths).

Main outcome measures: Differences in neonatal mortality rate (death before day 28 of life) according to the socioeconomic characteristics of the mother's municipality of residence. Comparison with data from a 2001-08 study to assess changes in socioeconomic inequalities and their contribution to the increase in neonatal mortality rate.

Results: The neonatal mortality rate was 2.53 per 1000 live births in 2015-20. Five indicators, previously associated with perinatal mortality, were combined into a perinatal French deprivation index (P-FDep) for the main analysis. P-FDep was categorised into five equal groups (deprivation groups 1-5) for comparison with other research and into 10 equal groups (deprivation groups 1-10) for more granular analyses, with group 1 being the least and group 5 (or group 10) the most deprived group. The rate in the most deprived compared with the least deprived group for P-FDep was 1.71 (95% confidence interval 1.60 to 1.83) times higher, based on the analysis of deprivation groups 1-5. A mortality gradient existed across the groups, translating into 2496 excess deaths (23.3%) when the rate in the least deprived group was applied to all areas. The gradient was more marked when deprivation groups 1-10 were used (relative risk 1.88, 95% CI 1.71 to 2.07 for the highest to the lowest deprived group). Compared with 2001-08 (neonatal mortality rate 2.39 per 1000), the rate remained constant in the least deprived areas, but worsened in the most deprived areas (+10.1% and +11.7% for groups 4 and 5, respectively), increasing the relative risks between the highest and lowest groups, which were 1.54 (95% CI 1.46 to 1.62) for deprivation groups 1-5 and 1.67 (1.55 to 1.79) for deprivation groups 1-10, in 2001-08.

Conclusions: In this study, the socioeconomic level of the mother's place of residence was strongly associated with the neonatal mortality rate. The data showed that inequalities have widened, contributing to the increase in the neonatal mortality rate.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

评价法国基于地区的社会经济不平等和新生儿死亡率:全国基于人口的研究。
摘要:目的:利用基于区域的社会经济指数,调查法国新生儿死亡率不平等的程度和演变。设计:基于全国人口的研究。背景:2015- 2020年,数据来自法国国家健康数据系统(system National des donnsam, SNDS)。2001- 2008年,按居住城市分列的新生儿死亡证明和汇总生命统计数据。参与者:2015- 2020年居住在法国大都市的母亲的胎龄≥22周的活产(4 293 403例活产和10 869例新生儿死亡),与2001-08年的研究(6 202 918例活产和14 851例新生儿死亡)相比。主要结果测量:根据母亲居住城市的社会经济特征,新生儿死亡率(出生后28天前死亡)的差异。与2001-08年评估社会经济不平等变化及其对新生儿死亡率上升的影响的研究数据的比较。结果:2015- 2020年新生儿死亡率为2.53 / 1000活产。以前与围产期死亡率相关的五个指标被合并成围产期法国剥夺指数(P-FDep)进行主要分析。P-FDep被分成5个相等的组(剥夺组1-5)与其他研究进行比较,并被分成10个相等的组(剥夺组1-10)进行更细致的分析,第1组是最少的,第5组(或第10组)是最被剥夺的组。根据对剥夺组1-5的分析,最剥夺组P-FDep的发生率比最剥夺组高1.71倍(95%可信区间1.60 ~ 1.83)。各群体之间存在死亡率梯度,当将最贫困群体的死亡率应用于所有地区时,死亡人数增加了2496人(23.3%)。当使用剥夺组1-10时,梯度更为明显(剥夺最高至最低组的相对风险为1.88,95% CI为1.71至2.07)。与2001-08年(新生儿死亡率2.39 / 1000)相比,最贫困地区的新生儿死亡率保持不变,但最贫困地区的新生儿死亡率有所恶化(第4组和第5组分别为+10.1%和+11.7%),最高和最低群体之间的相对风险增加,2001-08年,第1-5组的相对风险为1.54(95%可信区间1.46至1.62),第1-10组的相对风险为1.67(95%可信区间1.55至1.79)。结论:在本研究中,母亲居住地的社会经济水平与新生儿死亡率密切相关。数据显示,不平等现象扩大,导致新生儿死亡率上升。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信