Dimensions of Human-Machine Combination: Prompting the Development of Deployable Intelligent Decision Systems for Situated Clinical Contexts.

IF 2.3 3区 计算机科学 Q3 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Ben Wilson, Chiara Natali, Matt Roach, Darren Scott, Alma Rahat, David Rawlinson, Federico Cabitza
{"title":"Dimensions of Human-Machine Combination: Prompting the Development of Deployable Intelligent Decision Systems for Situated Clinical Contexts.","authors":"Ben Wilson, Chiara Natali, Matt Roach, Darren Scott, Alma Rahat, David Rawlinson, Federico Cabitza","doi":"10.1007/s10606-025-09514-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Whilst it is commonly reported that healthcare is set to benefit from advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), there is a consensus that, for clinical AI, a gulf exists between conception and implementation. Here we advocate the increased use of situated design and evaluation to close this gap, showing that in the literature there are comparatively few prospective situated studies. Focusing on the combined human-machine decision-making process - modelling, exchanging and resolving - we highlight the need for advances in exchanging and resolving. We present a novel relational space - <i>contextual dimensions of combination</i> - a means by which researchers, developers and clinicians can begin to frame the issues that must be addressed in order to close the chasm. We introduce a space of eight initial dimensions, namely <i>participating agents</i>, <i>control relations</i>, <i>task overlap</i>, <i>temporal patterning</i>, <i>informational proximity</i>, <i>informational overlap</i>, <i>input influence</i> and <i>output representation coverage</i>. We propose that our awareness of where we are in this space of combination will drive the development of interactions and the designs of AI models themselves. Designs that take account of how user-centered they will need to be for their performance to be translated into societal and individual benefit.</p>","PeriodicalId":51008,"journal":{"name":"Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing","volume":"34 2","pages":"425-481"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12436561/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing","FirstCategoryId":"94","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10606-025-09514-4","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"计算机科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/4/14 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Whilst it is commonly reported that healthcare is set to benefit from advances in Artificial Intelligence (AI), there is a consensus that, for clinical AI, a gulf exists between conception and implementation. Here we advocate the increased use of situated design and evaluation to close this gap, showing that in the literature there are comparatively few prospective situated studies. Focusing on the combined human-machine decision-making process - modelling, exchanging and resolving - we highlight the need for advances in exchanging and resolving. We present a novel relational space - contextual dimensions of combination - a means by which researchers, developers and clinicians can begin to frame the issues that must be addressed in order to close the chasm. We introduce a space of eight initial dimensions, namely participating agents, control relations, task overlap, temporal patterning, informational proximity, informational overlap, input influence and output representation coverage. We propose that our awareness of where we are in this space of combination will drive the development of interactions and the designs of AI models themselves. Designs that take account of how user-centered they will need to be for their performance to be translated into societal and individual benefit.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

人机结合的维度:促进临床情境下可部署智能决策系统的发展。
虽然人们普遍报道,医疗保健将受益于人工智能(AI)的进步,但人们一致认为,对于临床人工智能,概念和实施之间存在鸿沟。在这里,我们提倡更多地使用情境设计和评估来缩小这一差距,表明在文献中有相对较少的前瞻性情境研究。重点关注人机联合决策过程-建模,交换和解决-我们强调在交换和解决方面取得进展的必要性。我们提出了一种新的关系空间——结合的语境维度——通过这种方式,研究人员、开发人员和临床医生可以开始构建必须解决的问题,以弥合鸿沟。我们引入了一个由八个初始维度组成的空间,即参与主体、控制关系、任务重叠、时间模式、信息接近、信息重叠、输入影响和输出表示覆盖。我们认为,我们对自己在这个组合空间中的位置的认识,将推动交互的发展和人工智能模型本身的设计。考虑到如何以用户为中心的设计,才能将其性能转化为社会和个人利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing
Computer Supported Cooperative Work-The Journal of Collaborative Computing COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS-
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
31
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Computer Supported Cooperative Work (CSCW): The Journal of Collaborative Computing and Work Practices is devoted to innovative research in computer-supported cooperative work (CSCW). It provides an interdisciplinary and international forum for the debate and exchange of ideas concerning theoretical, practical, technical, and social issues in CSCW. The CSCW Journal arose in response to the growing interest in the design, implementation and use of technical systems (including computing, information, and communications technologies) which support people working cooperatively, and its scope remains to encompass the multifarious aspects of research within CSCW and related areas. The CSCW Journal focuses on research oriented towards the development of collaborative computing technologies on the basis of studies of actual cooperative work practices (where ‘work’ is used in the wider sense). That is, it welcomes in particular submissions that (a) report on findings from ethnographic or similar kinds of in-depth fieldwork of work practices with a view to their technological implications, (b) report on empirical evaluations of the use of extant or novel technical solutions under real-world conditions, and/or (c) develop technical or conceptual frameworks for practice-oriented computing research based on previous fieldwork and evaluations.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信