Collaboration During Crisis: New Graduates' Experiences of Interprofessional Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.

IF 1.6 3区 哲学 Q2 ETHICS
Lindsay Van Dam, Sheri L Price, Hossein Khalili, John H V Gilbert
{"title":"Collaboration During Crisis: New Graduates' Experiences of Interprofessional Practice During the COVID-19 Pandemic.","authors":"Lindsay Van Dam, Sheri L Price, Hossein Khalili, John H V Gilbert","doi":"10.1007/s10728-025-00540-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges for health and social care practice worldwide. Ensuring effective collaboration between health and social care is essential to meet population health needs- especially during crisis. Interprofessional education for collaborative practice (IPECP) during students' pre-licensure education is an important primer for collaboration in practice. Within IPECP, students are provided opportunities to learn about, with, and from each other, lending to professional and interprofessional socialization and processes of developing an interprofessional identity. Few studies have followed health professions graduates longitudinally from pre-licensure into professional practice to understand how IPECP supports new professionals' readiness for collaborative practice. The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with the timing of this longitudinal study of students' experiences of IPECP and collaboration upon entry to practice. This interpretive, narrative analysis provides novel insights to how collaboration was experienced during the pandemic and implications for interprofessional identity development. The participant narratives provide insight into the contexts, settings, and experiences that were critical catalysts for connection and collaboration between professionals. Findings support a need for IPECP throughout pre-licensure and into practice and provides important direction for innovative curricula, policy and practice development to prepare future collaborative practitioners and interprofessional teams.</p>","PeriodicalId":46740,"journal":{"name":"Health Care Analysis","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Care Analysis","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10728-025-00540-3","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ETHICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic presented unprecedented challenges for health and social care practice worldwide. Ensuring effective collaboration between health and social care is essential to meet population health needs- especially during crisis. Interprofessional education for collaborative practice (IPECP) during students' pre-licensure education is an important primer for collaboration in practice. Within IPECP, students are provided opportunities to learn about, with, and from each other, lending to professional and interprofessional socialization and processes of developing an interprofessional identity. Few studies have followed health professions graduates longitudinally from pre-licensure into professional practice to understand how IPECP supports new professionals' readiness for collaborative practice. The COVID-19 pandemic coincided with the timing of this longitudinal study of students' experiences of IPECP and collaboration upon entry to practice. This interpretive, narrative analysis provides novel insights to how collaboration was experienced during the pandemic and implications for interprofessional identity development. The participant narratives provide insight into the contexts, settings, and experiences that were critical catalysts for connection and collaboration between professionals. Findings support a need for IPECP throughout pre-licensure and into practice and provides important direction for innovative curricula, policy and practice development to prepare future collaborative practitioners and interprofessional teams.

危机中的协作:新冠肺炎大流行期间应届毕业生的跨专业实践经验。
2019冠状病毒病大流行给全球卫生和社会保健实践带来了前所未有的挑战。确保卫生和社会保健之间的有效合作对于满足人口健康需求至关重要,特别是在危机期间。跨专业合作实践教育是学生在执业前培养合作实践的重要基础。在ippp中,学生们有机会相互学习,相互学习,促进专业和跨专业的社会化以及发展跨专业身份的过程。很少有研究跟踪卫生专业毕业生从执照预备到专业实践,以了解IPECP如何支持新专业人员为合作实践做好准备。2019冠状病毒病大流行恰逢对学生ippe体验和实习后合作进行纵向研究的时间。这种解释性、叙述性的分析为大流行期间如何开展合作以及对跨专业身份发展的影响提供了新的见解。参与者的叙述提供了对背景、环境和经验的洞察,这些都是专业人员之间联系和合作的关键催化剂。研究结果表明,IPECP在执照申请和实践中都是必要的,并为创新课程、政策和实践发展提供了重要方向,为未来的合作从业者和跨专业团队做好准备。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
3
期刊介绍: Health Care Analysis is a journal that promotes dialogue and debate about conceptual and normative issues related to health and health care, including health systems, healthcare provision, health law, public policy and health, professional health practice, health services organization and decision-making, and health-related education at all levels of clinical medicine, public health and global health. Health Care Analysis seeks to support the conversation between philosophy and policy, in particular illustrating the importance of conceptual and normative analysis to health policy, practice and research. As such, papers accepted for publication are likely to analyse philosophical questions related to health, health care or health policy that focus on one or more of the following: aims or ends, theories, frameworks, concepts, principles, values or ideology. All styles of theoretical analysis are welcome providing that they illuminate conceptual or normative issues and encourage debate between those interested in health, philosophy and policy. Papers must be rigorous, but should strive for accessibility – with care being taken to ensure that their arguments and implications are plain to a broad academic and international audience. In addition to purely theoretical papers, papers grounded in empirical research or case-studies are very welcome so long as they explore the conceptual or normative implications of such work. Authors are encouraged, where possible, to have regard to the social contexts of the issues they are discussing, and all authors should ensure that they indicate the ‘real world’ implications of their work. Health Care Analysis publishes contributions from philosophers, lawyers, social scientists, healthcare educators, healthcare professionals and administrators, and other health-related academics and policy analysts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信