Development of a Clinical Decision-Making Framework to Address Parental Substance Use and Child Safety.

IF 3.2 4区 心理学 Q2 FAMILY STUDIES
Davida M Schiff, Galya Walt, Martha Kane, Melissa Maitland, Gina Liu, Sarah E Wakeman, Jessica R Gray
{"title":"Development of a Clinical Decision-Making Framework to Address Parental Substance Use and Child Safety.","authors":"Davida M Schiff, Galya Walt, Martha Kane, Melissa Maitland, Gina Liu, Sarah E Wakeman, Jessica R Gray","doi":"10.1080/15295192.2024.2422872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Clinicians caring for families impacted by substance use disorder often feel uncomfortable assessing for child protective concerns in the setting of non-prescribed parental substance use. This leads to a lack of standardization of care, where some clinicians choose to not ask any questions about the care of children for fear of receiving information that will leave them in an uncomfortable position as a mandated reporter, while others may reflexively report any identification of substance use to child protective services. The primary aim of this descriptive manuscript is to present a framework developed by a multidisciplinary team in a medical setting to address concerns about a recurrence of parental substance use.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We will highlight the development, implementation, and evolution of a clinical decision-making framework designed to help standardize clinicians' discussions around whether substance use could be affecting a parent's ability to safely care for their children.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Five main assessment areas will be discussed, including: 1). Safety of the child while substance use is occurring; 2). Safety of parental use patterns; 3). Parental treatment engagement; 4). Willingness to escalate treatment services; and 5). Stability of the home environment. We will present a clinical scenario to highlight how the framework is used as an aid to determine action planning with respect to immediate safety concerns, treatment escalation, and opportunities to maximize recovery supports. We discuss the challenges we've experienced and opportunities that arise in attempting to incorporate the principles of harm reduction within the context of assessments of child safety and well-being.</p>","PeriodicalId":47432,"journal":{"name":"Parenting-Science and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-11-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12440385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parenting-Science and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15295192.2024.2422872","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: Clinicians caring for families impacted by substance use disorder often feel uncomfortable assessing for child protective concerns in the setting of non-prescribed parental substance use. This leads to a lack of standardization of care, where some clinicians choose to not ask any questions about the care of children for fear of receiving information that will leave them in an uncomfortable position as a mandated reporter, while others may reflexively report any identification of substance use to child protective services. The primary aim of this descriptive manuscript is to present a framework developed by a multidisciplinary team in a medical setting to address concerns about a recurrence of parental substance use.

Design: We will highlight the development, implementation, and evolution of a clinical decision-making framework designed to help standardize clinicians' discussions around whether substance use could be affecting a parent's ability to safely care for their children.

Discussion: Five main assessment areas will be discussed, including: 1). Safety of the child while substance use is occurring; 2). Safety of parental use patterns; 3). Parental treatment engagement; 4). Willingness to escalate treatment services; and 5). Stability of the home environment. We will present a clinical scenario to highlight how the framework is used as an aid to determine action planning with respect to immediate safety concerns, treatment escalation, and opportunities to maximize recovery supports. We discuss the challenges we've experienced and opportunities that arise in attempting to incorporate the principles of harm reduction within the context of assessments of child safety and well-being.

临床决策框架的发展,以解决父母物质使用和儿童安全。
目的:临床医生在照顾受物质使用障碍影响的家庭时,在父母非处方物质使用的情况下评估儿童保护问题时常常感到不舒服。这导致护理缺乏标准化,一些临床医生选择不问任何关于儿童护理的问题,因为他们害怕收到的信息会使他们作为被授权的报告者处于不舒服的境地,而其他人可能会条件反射性地向儿童保护服务机构报告任何物质使用的识别。这篇描述性手稿的主要目的是提出一个由多学科团队在医疗环境中制定的框架,以解决对父母物质使用复发的担忧。设计:我们将重点介绍临床决策框架的发展、实施和演变,该框架旨在帮助规范临床医生关于药物使用是否会影响父母安全照顾孩子的能力的讨论。讨论:将讨论五个主要评估领域,包括:1)。发生药物使用时儿童的安全;2). 家长使用方式的安全性;3). 父母治疗参与;4). 愿意升级治疗服务;和5)。家庭环境的稳定。我们将介绍一个临床场景,以强调该框架如何用于辅助确定行动计划,涉及立即的安全问题、治疗升级和最大限度地恢复支持的机会。我们讨论了在尝试将减少伤害原则纳入儿童安全和福祉评估的背景下所经历的挑战和出现的机会。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
4.50%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Parenting: Science and Practice strives to promote the exchange of empirical findings, theoretical perspectives, and methodological approaches from all disciplines that help to define and advance theory, research, and practice in parenting, caregiving, and childrearing broadly construed. "Parenting" is interpreted to include biological parents and grandparents, adoptive parents, nonparental caregivers, and others, including infrahuman parents. Articles on parenting itself, antecedents of parenting, parenting effects on parents and on children, the multiple contexts of parenting, and parenting interventions and education are all welcome. The journal brings parenting to science and science to parenting.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信