Cervical dilation staging and early preterm birth risk after exam-indicated cerclage: A Retrospective Cohort Study with the International Collaborative for Cerclage Longitudinal Evaluation and Research (IC-CLEAR).

IF 3.1 2区 医学 Q1 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Keely L Robinson, Rupsa C Boelig, Sarah Boudova, Amanda Roman, Julio Mateus, Joanne N Quiñones Rivera, Joseph Bell, Jennifer Tymon, Mónica Rincón, Leonardo Pereira, Richard Burwick, Luisa López-Torres, Jose Bareno-Silve, Catalina Valencia, Jorge E Tolosa
{"title":"Cervical dilation staging and early preterm birth risk after exam-indicated cerclage: A Retrospective Cohort Study with the International Collaborative for Cerclage Longitudinal Evaluation and Research (IC-CLEAR).","authors":"Keely L Robinson, Rupsa C Boelig, Sarah Boudova, Amanda Roman, Julio Mateus, Joanne N Quiñones Rivera, Joseph Bell, Jennifer Tymon, Mónica Rincón, Leonardo Pereira, Richard Burwick, Luisa López-Torres, Jose Bareno-Silve, Catalina Valencia, Jorge E Tolosa","doi":"10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101782","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Preterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The risk of preterm birth, especially early preterm birth, and pregnancy loss is significantly increased in patients with premature cervical dilation. An intervention to reduce risk of preterm birth in this setting is cerclage, however, counseling on risk of preterm birth and neonatal outcomes based on different cervical examination findings at time of cerclage placement is difficult given limited data evaluating these differences.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We aimed to determine how the cervical exam staging criteria by Roman et al. (2023) prior to placement of exam-indicated cerclage was associated with risk of very early preterm birth<28 weeks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis utilizing the International Collaborative-Cerclage Longitudinal Evaluation and Research (IC-CLEAR) database, a multi-center international retrospective database of singleton pregnancies that received a cerclage. Our study included participants who received a physical examination-indicated cerclage. The predictor of interest was cervical stage assessed pre-operatively, evaluated as an ordinal variable with progressive severity indicated by advancing stage- Stage 3 (visually closed, manually dilated with palpable membranes), Stage 4A (visually dilated, membranes seen but not to external os), Stage 4B (visually dilated, membranes at external os), Stage 4C (visually dilated, membranes past external os). The primary outcome was preterm birth <28 weeks gestation. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth <34 weeks, preterm birth <37 weeks, and latency from cerclage placement to delivery. Multivariate analysis was conducted adjusting for study site, prior preterm birth, gestational age at cerclage placement, use of perioperative antibiotics or indomethacin, and progesterone use after cerclage placement.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The analysis included 81 patients who had placement of a physical examination-indicated cerclage and met the inclusion criteria. The number of patients in Stages 3, 4A, 4B, and 4C were 17, 27, 25, and 12, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed advanced cervical stage is significantly associated with preterm birth <28 weeks (overall p-value 0.003). Rates of preterm birth <28 weeks by stage were: 3 (11.7%), 4A (25.9%), 4B (44.0%), 4C (75.0%). Adjusted odds ratio for preterm birth by progressive cervical stage compared to Stage 3 were: Stage 4A (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 2.4 (0.31-19.25), P=0.40), Stage 4B (aOR 8.7, 95% CI (1.2-63.9), P=0.03), Stage 4C (aOR 43.73, 95% CI (3.3-572.2), P=0.004). Latency to delivery after cerclage decreased with increasing Roman stage, although this was only statistically significant for Stage 4C.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Cervical staging based on dilation and degree of membrane prolapse helps risk stratify patients presenting with advanced cervical dilation with successful cerclage placement and may be a useful tool for counseling and management.</p>","PeriodicalId":36186,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","volume":" ","pages":"101782"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology Mfm","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2025.101782","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Preterm birth is a leading cause of neonatal morbidity and mortality. The risk of preterm birth, especially early preterm birth, and pregnancy loss is significantly increased in patients with premature cervical dilation. An intervention to reduce risk of preterm birth in this setting is cerclage, however, counseling on risk of preterm birth and neonatal outcomes based on different cervical examination findings at time of cerclage placement is difficult given limited data evaluating these differences.

Objective: We aimed to determine how the cervical exam staging criteria by Roman et al. (2023) prior to placement of exam-indicated cerclage was associated with risk of very early preterm birth<28 weeks.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis utilizing the International Collaborative-Cerclage Longitudinal Evaluation and Research (IC-CLEAR) database, a multi-center international retrospective database of singleton pregnancies that received a cerclage. Our study included participants who received a physical examination-indicated cerclage. The predictor of interest was cervical stage assessed pre-operatively, evaluated as an ordinal variable with progressive severity indicated by advancing stage- Stage 3 (visually closed, manually dilated with palpable membranes), Stage 4A (visually dilated, membranes seen but not to external os), Stage 4B (visually dilated, membranes at external os), Stage 4C (visually dilated, membranes past external os). The primary outcome was preterm birth <28 weeks gestation. Secondary outcomes included preterm birth <34 weeks, preterm birth <37 weeks, and latency from cerclage placement to delivery. Multivariate analysis was conducted adjusting for study site, prior preterm birth, gestational age at cerclage placement, use of perioperative antibiotics or indomethacin, and progesterone use after cerclage placement.

Results: The analysis included 81 patients who had placement of a physical examination-indicated cerclage and met the inclusion criteria. The number of patients in Stages 3, 4A, 4B, and 4C were 17, 27, 25, and 12, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed advanced cervical stage is significantly associated with preterm birth <28 weeks (overall p-value 0.003). Rates of preterm birth <28 weeks by stage were: 3 (11.7%), 4A (25.9%), 4B (44.0%), 4C (75.0%). Adjusted odds ratio for preterm birth by progressive cervical stage compared to Stage 3 were: Stage 4A (aOR 2.4, 95% CI 2.4 (0.31-19.25), P=0.40), Stage 4B (aOR 8.7, 95% CI (1.2-63.9), P=0.03), Stage 4C (aOR 43.73, 95% CI (3.3-572.2), P=0.004). Latency to delivery after cerclage decreased with increasing Roman stage, although this was only statistically significant for Stage 4C.

Conclusion: Cervical staging based on dilation and degree of membrane prolapse helps risk stratify patients presenting with advanced cervical dilation with successful cerclage placement and may be a useful tool for counseling and management.

宫颈扩张分期和环切术后早期早产风险:与国际环切纵向评估和研究合作(IC-CLEAR)的回顾性队列研究
背景:早产是新生儿发病和死亡的主要原因。宫颈过早扩张患者发生早产,特别是早期早产和妊娠丢失的风险显著增加。在这种情况下,降低早产风险的一种干预措施是环扎术,然而,由于评估这些差异的数据有限,基于环扎术放置时不同宫颈检查结果的早产风险和新生儿结局的咨询是困难的。目的:我们旨在确定Roman等人(2023)在检查指示环切术放置之前的宫颈检查分期标准如何与极早期早产风险相关。方法:这是一项利用国际合作-环切术纵向评估和研究(IC-CLEAR)数据库的回顾性分析,该数据库是一个接受环切术的单胎妊娠的多中心国际回顾性数据库。我们的研究包括接受了体检指示的环切术的参与者。预测指标为术前评估的宫颈分期,以渐进严重程度的顺序变量进行评估,分期为:第3期(视觉闭合,可触及膜扩张),第4A期(视觉扩张,可见膜但未触及外os),第4B期(视觉扩张,外os膜),第4C期(视觉扩张,膜经过外os)。主要结局是早产。结果:该分析包括81例接受了体检指示的环切术并符合纳入标准的患者。3期、4A期、4B期和4C期患者分别为17例、27例、25例和12例。结论:基于宫颈扩张和宫颈膜脱垂程度的宫颈分期有助于宫颈扩张患者的风险分层,并可能是一个有用的咨询和管理工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.40
自引率
3.20%
发文量
254
审稿时长
40 days
期刊介绍: The American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology (AJOG) is a highly esteemed publication with two companion titles. One of these is the American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology Maternal-Fetal Medicine (AJOG MFM), which is dedicated to the latest research in the field of maternal-fetal medicine, specifically concerning high-risk pregnancies. The journal encompasses a wide range of topics, including: Maternal Complications: It addresses significant studies that have the potential to change clinical practice regarding complications faced by pregnant women. Fetal Complications: The journal covers prenatal diagnosis, ultrasound, and genetic issues related to the fetus, providing insights into the management and care of fetal health. Prenatal Care: It discusses the best practices in prenatal care to ensure the health and well-being of both the mother and the unborn child. Intrapartum Care: It provides guidance on the care provided during the childbirth process, which is critical for the safety of both mother and baby. Postpartum Issues: The journal also tackles issues that arise after childbirth, focusing on the postpartum period and its implications for maternal health. AJOG MFM serves as a reliable forum for peer-reviewed research, with a preference for randomized trials and meta-analyses. The goal is to equip researchers and clinicians with the most current information and evidence-based strategies to effectively manage high-risk pregnancies and to provide the best possible care for mothers and their unborn children.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信