Long-term 10-year outcomes of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): a comparative multicenter cohort study.

IF 2.7 2区 医学 Q2 SURGERY
Nour El Ghazal, Graziella Galvao Goncalves, Muhammad A Jawad, Michael L Kendrick, Andre F Teixeira, Omar M Ghanem
{"title":"Long-term 10-year outcomes of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) and single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S): a comparative multicenter cohort study.","authors":"Nour El Ghazal, Graziella Galvao Goncalves, Muhammad A Jawad, Michael L Kendrick, Andre F Teixeira, Omar M Ghanem","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12170-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>With the recent endorsement of the single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a modification of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS), long-term data regarding their comparison is scarce. This study aimed to compare the 10-year efficacy and safety outcomes of BPD/DS and SADI-S.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective review of patients undergoing BPD/DS and SADI-S as primary procedures was conducted at two centers. Outcomes assessed were weight loss, remission of obesity-related medical conditions and early and late complications. Chi-squared tests, t-tests for parametric data and Mann Whitney U tests for nonparametric data, and a linear fixed effects model were used for statistical analysis.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>101 patients underwent BPD/DS and 32 underwent SADI-S between 2008 and 2014. Mean preoperative body mass index (57.5 ± 9.5 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in BPD/DS vs 59.9 ± 9.7 kg/m<sup>2</sup> in SADI-S, p = 0.208) and age (46.9 ± 11.0 years in BPD/DS vs 43.3 ± 11.3 years in SADI-S, p = 0.102) were comparable between both groups. The mean percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at all time points, the maximum % TWL (45.7 ± 9.6% in BPD/DS vs 47.3 ± 10.1% in SADI-S, p = 0.418), and remission rates of obesity-related medical conditions were similar. The SADI-S group experienced more intraoperative complications (n = 3 vs n = 0 in BPD/DS, p = 0.013) and longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 3 days in BPD/DS, p < 0.001). More nutritional complications were seen after BPD/DS (53.5% vs 15.6% in SADI-S, p < 0.001). Rates of early and late complications were comparable between both cohorts.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although SADI-S is a relatively newer technique, long-term results seem promising, especially when compared to the traditional DS, which is known to raise safety and nutritional concerns. More long-term comparative studies are needed to contribute to this growing data.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12170-w","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: With the recent endorsement of the single-anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (SADI-S) as a modification of the biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS), long-term data regarding their comparison is scarce. This study aimed to compare the 10-year efficacy and safety outcomes of BPD/DS and SADI-S.

Methods: A retrospective review of patients undergoing BPD/DS and SADI-S as primary procedures was conducted at two centers. Outcomes assessed were weight loss, remission of obesity-related medical conditions and early and late complications. Chi-squared tests, t-tests for parametric data and Mann Whitney U tests for nonparametric data, and a linear fixed effects model were used for statistical analysis.

Results: 101 patients underwent BPD/DS and 32 underwent SADI-S between 2008 and 2014. Mean preoperative body mass index (57.5 ± 9.5 kg/m2 in BPD/DS vs 59.9 ± 9.7 kg/m2 in SADI-S, p = 0.208) and age (46.9 ± 11.0 years in BPD/DS vs 43.3 ± 11.3 years in SADI-S, p = 0.102) were comparable between both groups. The mean percentage total weight loss (%TWL) at all time points, the maximum % TWL (45.7 ± 9.6% in BPD/DS vs 47.3 ± 10.1% in SADI-S, p = 0.418), and remission rates of obesity-related medical conditions were similar. The SADI-S group experienced more intraoperative complications (n = 3 vs n = 0 in BPD/DS, p = 0.013) and longer hospital length of stay (4 vs 3 days in BPD/DS, p < 0.001). More nutritional complications were seen after BPD/DS (53.5% vs 15.6% in SADI-S, p < 0.001). Rates of early and late complications were comparable between both cohorts.

Conclusions: Although SADI-S is a relatively newer technique, long-term results seem promising, especially when compared to the traditional DS, which is known to raise safety and nutritional concerns. More long-term comparative studies are needed to contribute to this growing data.

十二指肠转流(BPD/DS)和单吻合术十二指肠回肠旁路术套筒胃切除术(SADI-S)的10年远期疗效:一项多中心队列比较研究。
背景:近年来,单吻合术十二指肠回肠旁路与套筒胃切除术(SADI-S)被认可为十二指肠开关胆胰分流术(BPD/DS)的改进,但关于两者比较的长期数据很少。本研究旨在比较BPD/DS和SADI-S的10年疗效和安全性结果。方法:回顾性分析两个中心接受BPD/DS和SADI-S作为主要手术的患者。评估的结果是体重减轻、肥胖相关疾病的缓解以及早期和晚期并发症。参数数据采用卡方检验、t检验,非参数数据采用Mann Whitney U检验,统计分析采用线性固定效应模型。结果:2008 - 2014年,101例患者接受BPD/DS治疗,32例患者接受SADI-S治疗。两组平均术前体重指数(BPD/DS组为57.5±9.5 kg/m2, SADI-S组为59.9±9.7 kg/m2, p = 0.208)和年龄(BPD/DS组为46.9±11.0岁,SADI-S组为43.3±11.3岁,p = 0.102)具有可比性。所有时间点的平均总体重减轻百分比(%TWL),最大%TWL (BPD/DS为45.7±9.6%,SADI-S为47.3±10.1%,p = 0.418)和肥胖相关疾病的缓解率相似。SADI-S组出现了更多的术中并发症(BPD/DS中n = 3 vs n = 0, p = 0.013)和更长的住院时间(BPD/DS中4 vs 3天,p)。结论:尽管SADI-S是一种相对较新的技术,但长期的结果似乎是有希望的,特别是与传统的DS相比,传统DS已知会提高安全性和营养问题。需要更多的长期比较研究来为这一不断增长的数据做出贡献。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
12.90%
发文量
890
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research. Topics covered in the journal include: -Surgical aspects of: Interventional endoscopy, Ultrasound, Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology, -Gastroenterologic surgery -Thoracic surgery -Traumatic surgery -Orthopedic surgery -Pediatric surgery
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信