Adverse Events Associated With Dabrafenib, Trametinib, and Their Combination Therapy: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.
Zhenpo Zhang, Qimin Wu, Yuting Wang, Yankun Liang, Jingping Zheng, Chufeng Ding, Lin Ma, Ling Su
{"title":"Adverse Events Associated With Dabrafenib, Trametinib, and Their Combination Therapy: A Disproportionality Analysis of the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (FAERS) Database.","authors":"Zhenpo Zhang, Qimin Wu, Yuting Wang, Yankun Liang, Jingping Zheng, Chufeng Ding, Lin Ma, Ling Su","doi":"10.1002/pds.70200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>Based on the FAERS database, this study aims to compare the safety of dabrafenib, trametinib, and their combination therapy, providing a reference for clinically safe medication.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Adverse event data for dabrafenib, trametinib, and their combination were extracted from the FAERS database. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and adverse event signals were mined using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) method and the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) method.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The dabrafenib group yielded 11 048 adverse event reports with 311 positive signals across 22 organ systems. The trametinib group had 7848 reports with 249 positive signals across 21 organ systems. The combination therapy group had 13 544 reports with 418 positive signals across 23 organ systems. Signals were primarily concentrated in investigations, while adverse event reports mainly focused on general disorders and administration site conditions. The distribution of adverse events within System Organ Classes (SOCs) differed among the three groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Dabrafenib was associated with stronger reporting signals for adverse events such as fever, hyperpyrexia, and tumor progression. Trametinib was associated with skin-related or infectious adverse events like rash, acneiform dermatitis, and paronychia. The combination therapy increased the risk of ocular and cardiovascular adverse events. These signals indicate potential risks but require clinical confirmation. Clinical practice should prioritize monitoring different adverse events based on patient characteristics and drug type.</p>","PeriodicalId":19782,"journal":{"name":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","volume":"34 9","pages":"e70200"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pds.70200","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objective: Based on the FAERS database, this study aims to compare the safety of dabrafenib, trametinib, and their combination therapy, providing a reference for clinically safe medication.
Methods: Adverse event data for dabrafenib, trametinib, and their combination were extracted from the FAERS database. Descriptive statistical analysis was performed, and adverse event signals were mined using the Reporting Odds Ratio (ROR) method and the Bayesian Confidence Propagation Neural Network (BCPNN) method.
Results: The dabrafenib group yielded 11 048 adverse event reports with 311 positive signals across 22 organ systems. The trametinib group had 7848 reports with 249 positive signals across 21 organ systems. The combination therapy group had 13 544 reports with 418 positive signals across 23 organ systems. Signals were primarily concentrated in investigations, while adverse event reports mainly focused on general disorders and administration site conditions. The distribution of adverse events within System Organ Classes (SOCs) differed among the three groups.
Conclusion: Dabrafenib was associated with stronger reporting signals for adverse events such as fever, hyperpyrexia, and tumor progression. Trametinib was associated with skin-related or infectious adverse events like rash, acneiform dermatitis, and paronychia. The combination therapy increased the risk of ocular and cardiovascular adverse events. These signals indicate potential risks but require clinical confirmation. Clinical practice should prioritize monitoring different adverse events based on patient characteristics and drug type.
期刊介绍:
The aim of Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety is to provide an international forum for the communication and evaluation of data, methods and opinion in the discipline of pharmacoepidemiology. The Journal publishes peer-reviewed reports of original research, invited reviews and a variety of guest editorials and commentaries embracing scientific, medical, statistical, legal and economic aspects of pharmacoepidemiology and post-marketing surveillance of drug safety. Appropriate material in these categories may also be considered for publication as a Brief Report.
Particular areas of interest include:
design, analysis, results, and interpretation of studies looking at the benefit or safety of specific pharmaceuticals, biologics, or medical devices, including studies in pharmacovigilance, postmarketing surveillance, pharmacoeconomics, patient safety, molecular pharmacoepidemiology, or any other study within the broad field of pharmacoepidemiology;
comparative effectiveness research relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics, and medical devices. Comparative effectiveness research is the generation and synthesis of evidence that compares the benefits and harms of alternative methods to prevent, diagnose, treat, and monitor a clinical condition, as these methods are truly used in the real world;
methodologic contributions of relevance to pharmacoepidemiology, whether original contributions, reviews of existing methods, or tutorials for how to apply the methods of pharmacoepidemiology;
assessments of harm versus benefit in drug therapy;
patterns of drug utilization;
relationships between pharmacoepidemiology and the formulation and interpretation of regulatory guidelines;
evaluations of risk management plans and programmes relating to pharmaceuticals, biologics and medical devices.