A Budget Impact Model of Treatment of Primary Immune Deficiency with Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% (IgPro20) (Hizentra).

IF 2.1 Q2 ECONOMICS
Rajiv Mallick, Rashad Carlton
{"title":"A Budget Impact Model of Treatment of Primary Immune Deficiency with Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% (IgPro20) (Hizentra).","authors":"Rajiv Mallick, Rashad Carlton","doi":"10.1007/s41669-025-00594-y","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Primary immune deficiency (PID) comprises over 400 inborn errors of immunity. Immune globulin replacement therapy (IGRT) is the standard of care for many PID subtypes. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is the historic standard of care, but subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) offers several advantages for IGRT. Further, a novel pre-filled syringe (PFS) drug packaging form of SCIG is expected to facilitate more efficient patient infusions.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The aim of this study was to quantify the projected budget impact associated with adding the IgPro20 PFS as an SCIG drug packaging option to a health plan formulary for the treatment of PID.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A budget impact model (BIM) was developed across the United States (US) integrated delivery networks (IDNs)' perspective over a 3-year time horizon to quantify the projected budget impact of adding the IgPro20 PFS as an SCIG packaging option for the treatment of PID. Model comparators included six IVIGs and seven SCIGs. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of model parameters on the budget impact. Scenario analyses of alternative market share shifts and pricing were conducted to test the robustness of the model results.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From the perspective of an IDN with 25 million members, the average annual expected cost per PID patient was US$73,343 for IgPro20 vials w/pump, US$60,892 for IgPro20 PFS w/pump, US$72,179 for IVIG, and US$96,581 for other SCIGs. Assuming market share uptake of 6.0% in the first year for IgPro20 PFS w/pump, rising to 8.4% by year 3, and offset by corresponding proportionate reductions in shares of the non-PFS SCIG IgPro20 vials w/pump only, the expected incremental budget impact over the 3-year horizon was savings of US$10.5 million.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>This BIM demonstrates that uptake of subcutaneous IgPro20 PFS is expected to be associated with substantial savings for a US IDN, including drug cost savings if offset by reduced non-PFS SCIG-packaging use.</p>","PeriodicalId":19770,"journal":{"name":"PharmacoEconomics Open","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PharmacoEconomics Open","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s41669-025-00594-y","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Primary immune deficiency (PID) comprises over 400 inborn errors of immunity. Immune globulin replacement therapy (IGRT) is the standard of care for many PID subtypes. Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) is the historic standard of care, but subcutaneous immunoglobulin (SCIG) offers several advantages for IGRT. Further, a novel pre-filled syringe (PFS) drug packaging form of SCIG is expected to facilitate more efficient patient infusions.

Objective: The aim of this study was to quantify the projected budget impact associated with adding the IgPro20 PFS as an SCIG drug packaging option to a health plan formulary for the treatment of PID.

Methods: A budget impact model (BIM) was developed across the United States (US) integrated delivery networks (IDNs)' perspective over a 3-year time horizon to quantify the projected budget impact of adding the IgPro20 PFS as an SCIG packaging option for the treatment of PID. Model comparators included six IVIGs and seven SCIGs. A one-way sensitivity analysis was conducted to assess the impact of model parameters on the budget impact. Scenario analyses of alternative market share shifts and pricing were conducted to test the robustness of the model results.

Results: From the perspective of an IDN with 25 million members, the average annual expected cost per PID patient was US$73,343 for IgPro20 vials w/pump, US$60,892 for IgPro20 PFS w/pump, US$72,179 for IVIG, and US$96,581 for other SCIGs. Assuming market share uptake of 6.0% in the first year for IgPro20 PFS w/pump, rising to 8.4% by year 3, and offset by corresponding proportionate reductions in shares of the non-PFS SCIG IgPro20 vials w/pump only, the expected incremental budget impact over the 3-year horizon was savings of US$10.5 million.

Conclusion: This BIM demonstrates that uptake of subcutaneous IgPro20 PFS is expected to be associated with substantial savings for a US IDN, including drug cost savings if offset by reduced non-PFS SCIG-packaging use.

皮下免疫球蛋白(人)20% (IgPro20)治疗原发性免疫缺陷的预算影响模型(Hizentra)。
背景:原发性免疫缺陷(PID)包括400多种先天性免疫缺陷。免疫球蛋白替代疗法(IGRT)是许多PID亚型的标准治疗方法。静脉注射免疫球蛋白(IVIG)是历史上的治疗标准,但皮下免疫球蛋白(SCIG)为IGRT提供了几个优势。此外,一种新型的预填充注射器(PFS) SCIG药物包装形式有望促进更有效的患者输液。目的:本研究的目的是量化将IgPro20 PFS作为SCIG药物包装选项添加到治疗PID的健康计划处方中的预计预算影响。方法:在美国(US)综合交付网络(idn)的3年时间范围内开发了一个预算影响模型(BIM),以量化添加IgPro20 PFS作为治疗PID的SCIG包装选项的预计预算影响。模型比较国包括6个ivg和7个scg。通过单向敏感性分析来评估模型参数对预算影响的影响。为了检验模型结果的稳健性,对可替代市场份额变动和定价进行了情景分析。结果:从拥有2500万会员的IDN的角度来看,每名PID患者的平均年预期费用为:IgPro20小瓶(带泵)73343美元,IgPro20 PFS(带泵)60892美元,IVIG 72179美元,其他SCIGs 96581美元。假设第一年IgPro20 PFS(带泵)的市场份额为6.0%,到第三年将上升到8.4%,并被非PFS SCIG IgPro20小瓶(仅带泵)的市场份额相应减少所抵消,预计3年内的增量预算影响将节省1050万美元。结论:该BIM表明,皮下使用IgPro20 PFS有望为美国IDN节省大量费用,包括减少非PFS scig包装使用所抵消的药物成本节省。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊介绍: PharmacoEconomics - Open focuses on applied research on the economic implications and health outcomes associated with drugs, devices and other healthcare interventions. The journal includes, but is not limited to, the following research areas:Economic analysis of healthcare interventionsHealth outcomes researchCost-of-illness studiesQuality-of-life studiesAdditional digital features (including animated abstracts, video abstracts, slide decks, audio slides, instructional videos, infographics, podcasts and animations) can be published with articles; these are designed to increase the visibility, readership and educational value of the journal’s content. In addition, articles published in PharmacoEconomics -Open may be accompanied by plain language summaries to assist readers who have some knowledge of, but not in-depth expertise in, the area to understand important medical advances.All manuscripts are subject to peer review by international experts. Letters to the Editor are welcomed and will be considered for publication.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信