Effectiveness and Safety of Tuina Therapy Combined With Yijinjing Exercise for Neck Pain: Protocol for a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Abstract

Background: Neck pain with high incidence and recurrence rates significantly impairs patients' quality of life and imposes a considerable economic burden. Traditional Chinese medicine therapies such as Yijinjing exercise and Tuina have shown promising efficacy in alleviating the local symptoms of neck pain. However, there is currently insufficient high-level evidence to robustly support these findings.

Objective: This study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of combining Yijinjing exercise with Tuina for the treatment of neck pain.

Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, Chinese Biomedical Database, VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodicals Full-Text database, and Wanfang database will be systematically searched for all relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from their inception to September 2025, without language or publication status restrictions. The Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 assessment tool will be used to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies, and the GRADE (Grades of Recommendation, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) system will be employed to grade the quality of evidence. Heterogeneity will be evaluated through I² statistics and Cochran's Q test: a fixed-effect model will be used when I²<50% and P≥.01. If I²≥50% or P<.01, subgroup analysis will be conducted. When heterogeneity still exists, sensitivity analysis or exploratory subgroup analysis will be performed. If it cannot be explained ultimately, the random-effects model will be adopted and the GRADE evidence level will be reduced.

Results: As of June 2025, we have completed the preliminary screening of titles and abstracts for 573 studies. The full-text screening is expected to be completed by September 2025, and data analysis is planned to be completed by December 2025. About two-thirds of the studies were published after 2015. Geographically, the samples in the studies were highly concentrated in Asia. The results were comprehensively developed around the core outcomes. The primary outcome was presented by changes in the visual analog scale. The secondary outcomes were evaluated by the neck disability index, self-rating anxiety scale score, mean vertebral artery blood flow velocity, and Cobb angle.

Conclusions: If the results of this study confirm the effectiveness of massage combined with Yijinjing, it can provide a direction for the nonpharmaceutical treatment of neck pain. However, some studies have risks of bias such as insufficient standardization of massage operations and difficulty in implementing blinding methods. The expected heterogeneity is significant due to differences in intervention plans and patients' cultural backgrounds, and the original RCTs are few and regionally concentrated, with limited extrapolation of conclusions. In the future, it is necessary to optimize the plan and supplement data through high-quality multicenter research to enhance reliability.

Trial registration: PROSPERO CRD420251026508; https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/view/CRD420251026508.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/77864.