Optimizing Digital Solutions to Improve Access to Comprehensive Primary Health Care Services in Remote Indigenous Communities: Protocol for a Participatory Action Research Project.

IF 1.5 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES
Vishnu Khanal, Emily Saurman, Deborah J Russell, Nicki Newton, Karina Coombes, Alexandar Puruntatameri, Sarah Norris, Amy von Huben, Tamsin Cockyane, Paul Burgess, John Wakerman, Timothy Shaw
{"title":"Optimizing Digital Solutions to Improve Access to Comprehensive Primary Health Care Services in Remote Indigenous Communities: Protocol for a Participatory Action Research Project.","authors":"Vishnu Khanal, Emily Saurman, Deborah J Russell, Nicki Newton, Karina Coombes, Alexandar Puruntatameri, Sarah Norris, Amy von Huben, Tamsin Cockyane, Paul Burgess, John Wakerman, Timothy Shaw","doi":"10.2196/68892","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) peoples living in remote Australia experience a heavy burden of ill health and multiple barriers to accessing health care. Digital health technologies (DHTs) have the potential to help overcome some of these challenges and increase access to comprehensive primary health care (CPHC), thereby improving equity of health outcomes. However, little is known about the community and provider preferences for the use of digital technologies for improving health and wellness.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>The study aims to co-design, implement, and evaluate how DHTs can improve access to CPHC in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This multiphased project will take a participatory action research approach to co-design and optimize digital health solutions with local community members and health service staff in 2 communities. Our mixed methods approach will include pre- and postimplementation focus group discussions, interviews, quantitative analysis of CPHC utilization administrative data, and surveys administered by Indigenous community-based researchers to understand the use of digital devices and connectivity, eHealth literacy, preferences for different attributes of DHTs using best-worst scaling, and consumer satisfaction and experiences with DHT interventions. Priority DHTs will be selected for implementation based on consumer and health staff preferences. Focus group discussions and interview data will explore community and health service staff preferences, experiences, and satisfaction with implemented DHTs. A realist approach will be taken to identify how DHT interventions work, for whom, and in what circumstances, so that the understanding of why some interventions work while others do not is expanded. Economic analyses will be conducted to calculate the incremental costs and benefits of implemented DHT interventions. The scalability of digital health solutions will be tested in two additional communities. Project partners include key funding, service, and support agencies in the NT and nationally.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>As of November 2024, we have selected two implementation sites. Digital health initiatives are underway at the implementation sites, and evaluation activities are progressing. The initial findings from these sites have informed our scalability assessment in an additional two sites.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Knowledge translation is integral to the study design, which involves partnering with consumers, CPHC service providers, and a range of key stakeholders to inform health service providers and policy makers about which DHTs work for which groups of consumers, and under what circumstances, to improve access to CPHC. This unique study will accommodate consumer and provider preferences regarding the use of DHTs to improve CPHC access and address the lack of knowledge about how to deploy digital solutions to best support CPHC in remote Indigenous Australia.</p><p><strong>International registered report identifier (irrid): </strong>DERR1-10.2196/68892.</p>","PeriodicalId":14755,"journal":{"name":"JMIR Research Protocols","volume":"14 ","pages":"e68892"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12489406/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JMIR Research Protocols","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2196/68892","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander (Indigenous) peoples living in remote Australia experience a heavy burden of ill health and multiple barriers to accessing health care. Digital health technologies (DHTs) have the potential to help overcome some of these challenges and increase access to comprehensive primary health care (CPHC), thereby improving equity of health outcomes. However, little is known about the community and provider preferences for the use of digital technologies for improving health and wellness.

Objective: The study aims to co-design, implement, and evaluate how DHTs can improve access to CPHC in remote Indigenous communities in the Northern Territory (NT), Australia.

Methods: This multiphased project will take a participatory action research approach to co-design and optimize digital health solutions with local community members and health service staff in 2 communities. Our mixed methods approach will include pre- and postimplementation focus group discussions, interviews, quantitative analysis of CPHC utilization administrative data, and surveys administered by Indigenous community-based researchers to understand the use of digital devices and connectivity, eHealth literacy, preferences for different attributes of DHTs using best-worst scaling, and consumer satisfaction and experiences with DHT interventions. Priority DHTs will be selected for implementation based on consumer and health staff preferences. Focus group discussions and interview data will explore community and health service staff preferences, experiences, and satisfaction with implemented DHTs. A realist approach will be taken to identify how DHT interventions work, for whom, and in what circumstances, so that the understanding of why some interventions work while others do not is expanded. Economic analyses will be conducted to calculate the incremental costs and benefits of implemented DHT interventions. The scalability of digital health solutions will be tested in two additional communities. Project partners include key funding, service, and support agencies in the NT and nationally.

Results: As of November 2024, we have selected two implementation sites. Digital health initiatives are underway at the implementation sites, and evaluation activities are progressing. The initial findings from these sites have informed our scalability assessment in an additional two sites.

Conclusions: Knowledge translation is integral to the study design, which involves partnering with consumers, CPHC service providers, and a range of key stakeholders to inform health service providers and policy makers about which DHTs work for which groups of consumers, and under what circumstances, to improve access to CPHC. This unique study will accommodate consumer and provider preferences regarding the use of DHTs to improve CPHC access and address the lack of knowledge about how to deploy digital solutions to best support CPHC in remote Indigenous Australia.

International registered report identifier (irrid): DERR1-10.2196/68892.

Abstract Image

优化数字解决方案以改善偏远土著社区获得综合初级卫生保健服务的机会:参与性行动研究项目议定书。
背景:生活在澳大利亚偏远地区的土著和托雷斯海峡岛民(土著)承受着健康不佳的沉重负担,在获得医疗保健方面面临多重障碍。数字卫生技术有可能帮助克服其中一些挑战,增加获得全面初级卫生保健(CPHC)的机会,从而改善卫生结果的公平性。然而,社区和提供者对使用数字技术改善健康和保健的偏好知之甚少。目的:本研究旨在共同设计、实施和评估dht如何改善澳大利亚北领地(NT)偏远土著社区获得CPHC的机会。方法:该多阶段项目将采用参与式行动研究方法,与两个社区的当地社区成员和卫生服务人员共同设计和优化数字卫生解决方案。我们的混合方法将包括实施前和实施后的焦点小组讨论、访谈、CPHC使用管理数据的定量分析,以及由土著社区研究人员管理的调查,以了解数字设备和连接性的使用、电子健康素养、对采用最佳最差规模的DHT不同属性的偏好,以及消费者对DHT干预措施的满意度和体验。将根据消费者和卫生工作人员的偏好选择实施重点卫生保健方案。焦点小组讨论和访谈数据将探讨社区和卫生服务人员对实施的dht的偏好、经验和满意度。将采取现实主义的方法来确定DHT干预措施如何起作用,对谁起作用,以及在什么情况下起作用,以便扩大对为什么有些干预措施起作用而另一些不起作用的理解。将进行经济分析,以计算实施DHT干预措施的增量成本和收益。数字卫生解决方案的可扩展性将在另外两个社区进行测试。项目合作伙伴包括北部地区和全国的主要供资、服务和支助机构。结果:截至2024年11月,我们选择了两个实施地点。数字卫生倡议正在各实施地点开展,评估活动正在取得进展。这些站点的初步发现为我们对另外两个站点的可伸缩性评估提供了依据。结论:知识转化是研究设计不可或缺的一部分,它涉及与消费者、初级保健服务提供者和一系列关键利益攸关方合作,告知卫生服务提供者和政策制定者哪些dht为哪些消费者群体工作,以及在什么情况下,以改善初级保健服务的可及性。这项独特的研究将适应消费者和供应商对使用dht改善CPHC访问的偏好,并解决关于如何部署数字解决方案以最好地支持偏远澳大利亚土著居民CPHC的知识缺乏问题。国际注册报告标识符(irrid): DERR1-10.2196/68892。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
5.90%
发文量
414
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信