Comparison of the impact of shunting the left versus right portal vein branch during TIPS on the postoperative overt hepatic encephalopathy: a randomized trial.

IF 6.1 2区 医学 Q1 GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY
Yongjie Zhou, Jingqin Ma, Yaozu Liu, Li Ma, Jiaze Yu, Minjie Yang, Zhiping Yan, Wen Zhang, Jianjun Luo
{"title":"Comparison of the impact of shunting the left versus right portal vein branch during TIPS on the postoperative overt hepatic encephalopathy: a randomized trial.","authors":"Yongjie Zhou, Jingqin Ma, Yaozu Liu, Li Ma, Jiaze Yu, Minjie Yang, Zhiping Yan, Wen Zhang, Jianjun Luo","doi":"10.1007/s12072-025-10908-1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background and aim: </strong>The effect of shunting the left or right branch of the portal vein on the post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains controversial. Therefore, we designed this prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial to compare the incidence of HE after shunting the left or right branch of the portal vein during TIPS in cirrhotic patients to prevent variceal rebleeding.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Consecutive patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo the TIPS procedure, with the shunt directed to either the left or right branch of the portal vein. The primary outcome was the incidence of overt HE within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included shunt dysfunction, variceal rebleeding, survival, adverse events, and changes in liver function.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Between June 2019 and December 2020, 130 patients were randomly divided into two groups (left branch group vs right branch group). The 2-year cumulative incidence rates of free overt HE in the left branch group did not demonstrate statistical superiority over the right branch group (78.5% vs 68.6%, respectively; p = 0.236, HR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.76-2.93). Similarly, no statistical differences were observed in stent patency, all-cause bleeding, survival, or adverse events.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Compared to shunting the right branch of the portal vein, shunting the left branch during TIPS placement did not impact the incidence of post-TIPS HE and other clinical outcomes in cirrhotic patients to prevent variceal rebleeding. The choice of puncture site should be primarily guided by the patient's liver anatomy and the operator's experience.</p>","PeriodicalId":12901,"journal":{"name":"Hepatology International","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hepatology International","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s12072-025-10908-1","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"GASTROENTEROLOGY & HEPATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background and aim: The effect of shunting the left or right branch of the portal vein on the post-transjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt (TIPS) hepatic encephalopathy (HE) remains controversial. Therefore, we designed this prospective, randomized, single-blinded trial to compare the incidence of HE after shunting the left or right branch of the portal vein during TIPS in cirrhotic patients to prevent variceal rebleeding.

Methods: Consecutive patients diagnosed with hepatitis B virus (HBV)-related cirrhosis were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to undergo the TIPS procedure, with the shunt directed to either the left or right branch of the portal vein. The primary outcome was the incidence of overt HE within 2 years. The secondary outcomes included shunt dysfunction, variceal rebleeding, survival, adverse events, and changes in liver function.

Results: Between June 2019 and December 2020, 130 patients were randomly divided into two groups (left branch group vs right branch group). The 2-year cumulative incidence rates of free overt HE in the left branch group did not demonstrate statistical superiority over the right branch group (78.5% vs 68.6%, respectively; p = 0.236, HR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.76-2.93). Similarly, no statistical differences were observed in stent patency, all-cause bleeding, survival, or adverse events.

Conclusion: Compared to shunting the right branch of the portal vein, shunting the left branch during TIPS placement did not impact the incidence of post-TIPS HE and other clinical outcomes in cirrhotic patients to prevent variceal rebleeding. The choice of puncture site should be primarily guided by the patient's liver anatomy and the operator's experience.

TIPS术中门静脉左支与右支分流对术后肝性脑病影响的比较:一项随机试验。
背景与目的:门静脉左支或右支分流对经颈静脉肝内门静脉系统分流(TIPS)肝性脑病(HE)的影响仍有争议。因此,我们设计了这项前瞻性、随机、单盲试验,以比较肝硬化患者在TIPS期间门静脉左支或右支分流后HE的发生率,以防止静脉曲张再出血。方法:连续诊断为乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)相关肝硬化的患者按1:1的比例随机分配接受TIPS手术,分流管指向门静脉的左支或右支。主要观察指标为2年内显性HE的发生率。次要结局包括分流功能障碍、静脉曲张再出血、生存、不良事件和肝功能改变。结果:2019年6月~ 2020年12月,将130例患者随机分为左支组和右支组。左支组游离显性HE的2年累积发病率与右支组相比无统计学优势(分别为78.5% vs 68.6%; p = 0.236, HR = 1.49, 95% CI 0.76-2.93)。同样,在支架通畅、全因出血、生存率或不良事件方面也没有观察到统计学差异。结论:与分流门静脉右支相比,在置放TIPS期间分流门静脉左支对肝硬化患者预防静脉曲张再出血的TIPS后HE发生率和其他临床结果没有影响。穿刺部位的选择应主要根据患者的肝脏解剖结构和术者的经验来指导。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Hepatology International
Hepatology International 医学-胃肠肝病学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
3.00%
发文量
167
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Hepatology International is the official journal of the Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL). This is a peer-reviewed journal featuring articles written by clinicians, clinical researchers and basic scientists is dedicated to research and patient care issues in hepatology. This journal will focus mainly on new and emerging technologies, cutting-edge science and advances in liver and biliary disorders. Types of articles published: -Original Research Articles related to clinical care and basic research -Review Articles -Consensus guidelines for diagnosis and treatment -Clinical cases, images -Selected Author Summaries -Video Submissions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信