Guiding Management of Bethesda V Thyroid Nodules: The Role of Molecular Testing.

IF 2.4 3区 医学 Q2 ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Idit Tessler, Grégoire B Morand, Nir A Gecel, Arad Dotan, Tzahi Yamin, Eran E Alon, Richard J Payne, Galit Avior
{"title":"Guiding Management of Bethesda V Thyroid Nodules: The Role of Molecular Testing.","authors":"Idit Tessler, Grégoire B Morand, Nir A Gecel, Arad Dotan, Tzahi Yamin, Eran E Alon, Richard J Payne, Galit Avior","doi":"10.1111/cen.70032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objective: </strong>The 2023 Bethesda System update introduced molecular testing as a management option for Bethesda V cytology nodules, aiming to guide surgical decision-making. This study investigates the correlation between molecular profiling and malignancy aggressiveness.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving patients with Bethesda V cytology and confirmed malignant pathology who underwent molecular profiling between 2018 and 2021.</p><p><strong>Patients: </strong>A total of 156 patients with Bethesda V cytology and final malignant histology were included.</p><p><strong>Measurements: </strong>Malignancy aggressiveness was assessed based on histopathological features following 2015 ATA guidelines. Demographic data, pathology results, and genetic variants were analyzed. Molecular profiling results were stratified according to variant risk levels.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>We identified 161 Bethesda V nodules, of which 153 (95.0%) were malignant on final pathology. Genetic stratification revealed no detected mutations in 39.7% (n = 56), low-risk (n = 49, 31.4%), and intermediate-risk variants (n = 45, 28.8%). Only one patient had a high-risk variant. Patients with intermediate-risk variants had a sixfold risk of aggressive disease compared to those with low-risk variants (49% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001). RAS mutations were the most common among the low-risk group (68.8%) and BRAF V600E predominated in the intermediate-risk group (93.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Our findings suggest that molecular profiling offers insights into risk stratification for Bethesda V thyroid lesions, demonstrating a very low incidence of aggressive pathology in the low-risk molecular group.</p>","PeriodicalId":10346,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Endocrinology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Endocrinology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cen.70032","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: The 2023 Bethesda System update introduced molecular testing as a management option for Bethesda V cytology nodules, aiming to guide surgical decision-making. This study investigates the correlation between molecular profiling and malignancy aggressiveness.

Design: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study involving patients with Bethesda V cytology and confirmed malignant pathology who underwent molecular profiling between 2018 and 2021.

Patients: A total of 156 patients with Bethesda V cytology and final malignant histology were included.

Measurements: Malignancy aggressiveness was assessed based on histopathological features following 2015 ATA guidelines. Demographic data, pathology results, and genetic variants were analyzed. Molecular profiling results were stratified according to variant risk levels.

Results: We identified 161 Bethesda V nodules, of which 153 (95.0%) were malignant on final pathology. Genetic stratification revealed no detected mutations in 39.7% (n = 56), low-risk (n = 49, 31.4%), and intermediate-risk variants (n = 45, 28.8%). Only one patient had a high-risk variant. Patients with intermediate-risk variants had a sixfold risk of aggressive disease compared to those with low-risk variants (49% vs. 8.2%, p < 0.001). RAS mutations were the most common among the low-risk group (68.8%) and BRAF V600E predominated in the intermediate-risk group (93.3%).

Conclusions: Our findings suggest that molecular profiling offers insights into risk stratification for Bethesda V thyroid lesions, demonstrating a very low incidence of aggressive pathology in the low-risk molecular group.

Bethesda V型甲状腺结节的指导治疗:分子检测的作用。
目的:2023年Bethesda系统更新引入分子检测作为Bethesda V细胞学结节的管理选择,旨在指导手术决策。本研究探讨分子谱与恶性肿瘤侵袭性的关系。设计:我们进行了一项回顾性多中心研究,涉及2018年至2021年期间接受Bethesda V细胞学检查并确认恶性病理的患者。患者:共纳入156例Bethesda V细胞学检查和最终恶性组织学检查的患者。测量方法:根据2015年ATA指南的组织病理学特征评估恶性肿瘤侵袭性。分析了人口统计数据、病理结果和遗传变异。分子分析结果根据不同的风险水平分层。结果:我们发现161例Bethesda V型结节,其中153例(95.0%)最终病理为恶性。遗传分层显示,39.7% (n = 56)、低危(n = 49, 31.4%)和中危变异(n = 45, 28.8%)未检测到突变。只有一名患者携带高危变异基因。中危变异体患者发生侵袭性疾病的风险是低危变异体患者的6倍(49% vs. 8.2%)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,分子谱分析为Bethesda V型甲状腺病变的风险分层提供了见解,表明低危分子组的侵袭性病理发生率非常低。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Endocrinology
Clinical Endocrinology 医学-内分泌学与代谢
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
3.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: Clinical Endocrinology publishes papers and reviews which focus on the clinical aspects of endocrinology, including the clinical application of molecular endocrinology. It does not publish papers relating directly to diabetes care and clinical management. It features reviews, original papers, commentaries, correspondence and Clinical Questions. Clinical Endocrinology is essential reading not only for those engaged in endocrinological research but also for those involved primarily in clinical practice.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信