{"title":"Communication among health professionals using newborn technology for care: an exploratory scoping review.","authors":"Gloria Karungo Ngaiza, Dorothy Oluoch, Catherine Molyneux, Catherine Pope, Caroline Jones","doi":"10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003501","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Neonatal technologies can significantly improve care quality and reduce newborn deaths. However, their successful implementation in complex health system contexts requires effective communication among health professionals. A comprehensive understanding of communication among professionals using newborn technologies is needed to inform technology implementation. We conducted a scoping review of the current literature. We searched the grey literature and online resources, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, for articles. We included English literature that discussed the use of technology in newborn care. 13 papers met the inclusion criteria. We analysed the findings using a thematic approach. 11 of the 13 papers included were based on research conducted in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), with continuous positive airway pressure being the most frequently covered technology. The communication information was limited, as these topics were just one of many themes in the papers. Most studies focused on nurses, encompassing aspects of communication such as knowledge sharing and interactions during patient management, monitoring and documentation. However, there was little detail on the nature of these interactions or where they occurred. Factors influencing communication included physical contexts such as infrastructure, socio-organisational contexts such as hierarchy and levels of skills, and technology-related factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. If and how these factors interacted with each other to shape technology-related communication was unclear. We highlight gaps in the literature on communication among health professionals using newborn technology for care. We stress the importance of carefully examining the physical and socio-organisational contextual factors and technology-specific attributes that shape communication in all settings, including LMICs. Research aiming to better understand the context of technology implementation will support the successful implementation of potentially life-saving technologies.</p>","PeriodicalId":9052,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Open Quality","volume":"14 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12443173/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Open Quality","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjoq-2025-003501","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Neonatal technologies can significantly improve care quality and reduce newborn deaths. However, their successful implementation in complex health system contexts requires effective communication among health professionals. A comprehensive understanding of communication among professionals using newborn technologies is needed to inform technology implementation. We conducted a scoping review of the current literature. We searched the grey literature and online resources, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, Embase, Cochrane Library and Google Scholar, for articles. We included English literature that discussed the use of technology in newborn care. 13 papers met the inclusion criteria. We analysed the findings using a thematic approach. 11 of the 13 papers included were based on research conducted in low-income and middle-income countries (LMICs), with continuous positive airway pressure being the most frequently covered technology. The communication information was limited, as these topics were just one of many themes in the papers. Most studies focused on nurses, encompassing aspects of communication such as knowledge sharing and interactions during patient management, monitoring and documentation. However, there was little detail on the nature of these interactions or where they occurred. Factors influencing communication included physical contexts such as infrastructure, socio-organisational contexts such as hierarchy and levels of skills, and technology-related factors such as perceived usefulness and ease of use. If and how these factors interacted with each other to shape technology-related communication was unclear. We highlight gaps in the literature on communication among health professionals using newborn technology for care. We stress the importance of carefully examining the physical and socio-organisational contextual factors and technology-specific attributes that shape communication in all settings, including LMICs. Research aiming to better understand the context of technology implementation will support the successful implementation of potentially life-saving technologies.
新生儿技术可以显著提高护理质量,减少新生儿死亡。然而,在复杂的卫生系统环境中,它们的成功实施需要卫生专业人员之间的有效沟通。需要全面了解使用新技术的专业人员之间的交流,以便为技术实施提供信息。我们对当前文献进行了范围综述。我们检索了灰色文献和在线资源,包括PubMed、Web of Science、Scopus、Embase、Cochrane Library和b谷歌Scholar。我们纳入了讨论在新生儿护理中使用技术的英文文献。13篇论文符合纳入标准。我们使用专题方法分析了调查结果。纳入的13篇论文中有11篇基于在低收入和中等收入国家进行的研究,持续气道正压通气是最常涉及的技术。由于这些话题只是论文众多主题中的一个,因此交流信息有限。大多数研究集中在护士身上,包括患者管理、监测和记录过程中的知识共享和互动等沟通方面。然而,关于这些相互作用的性质或发生地点的细节很少。影响沟通的因素包括物理环境(如基础设施)、社会组织环境(如等级和技能水平)以及与技术相关的因素(如感知有用性和易用性)。这些因素是否以及如何相互作用以形成与技术相关的交流尚不清楚。我们强调了关于卫生专业人员使用新生儿技术进行护理的沟通方面的文献差距。我们强调仔细研究包括中低收入国家在内的所有环境中影响沟通的物理和社会组织背景因素以及技术特定属性的重要性。旨在更好地了解技术实施背景的研究将支持成功实施可能挽救生命的技术。