{"title":"Assessing the efficacy of anticoagulation therapy in the treatment of vascular Behçet's disease: a systematic review.","authors":"Mahmud Omar, Fadi Hassan, Mohammad E Naffaa","doi":"10.55563/clinexprheumatol/t03f5r","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>Behçet's disease (BD) often presents with vascular complications, termed vascular Behçet's disease (VBD). While immunosuppression (IS) is the cornerstone of treatment, the role of anticoagulation (AC) is debated. This systematic review aims to consolidate and summarise the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of AC in VBD, especially considering emerging studies post-2018 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus up to January 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We included studies that investigated the impact of AC on VBD outcomes, using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools for data extraction and risk of bias assessment.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Our search yielded 2,202 articles, with 34 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Results indicate variable AC coverage, from 10.8% to 98.6% across studies, with different anticoagulants employed. Some studies highlighted significant benefits of AC in reducing thrombotic events and improving surgical outcomes, whereas others showed neutral or limited effects. Safety profiles were generally favourable, with low incidences of significant bleeding.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>AC therapy can be beneficial in certain contexts of VBD, particularly in reducing thrombosis recurrence and managing postoperative complications. However, the benefits of AC are not uniformly demonstrated across all patient settings, suggesting a tailored approach to AC use in VBD might be warranted. The findings underscore the necessity for randomised controlled trials to clarify the optimal therapeutic strategies for AC in conjunction with IS in BD.</p>","PeriodicalId":10274,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and experimental rheumatology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55563/clinexprheumatol/t03f5r","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"RHEUMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Objectives: Behçet's disease (BD) often presents with vascular complications, termed vascular Behçet's disease (VBD). While immunosuppression (IS) is the cornerstone of treatment, the role of anticoagulation (AC) is debated. This systematic review aims to consolidate and summarise the current evidence on the efficacy and safety of AC in VBD, especially considering emerging studies post-2018 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR) recommendations.
Methods: We conducted a systematic search across PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Scopus up to January 2024, adhering to PRISMA guidelines. We included studies that investigated the impact of AC on VBD outcomes, using the Joanna Briggs Institute tools for data extraction and risk of bias assessment.
Results: Our search yielded 2,202 articles, with 34 studies meeting inclusion criteria. Results indicate variable AC coverage, from 10.8% to 98.6% across studies, with different anticoagulants employed. Some studies highlighted significant benefits of AC in reducing thrombotic events and improving surgical outcomes, whereas others showed neutral or limited effects. Safety profiles were generally favourable, with low incidences of significant bleeding.
Conclusions: AC therapy can be beneficial in certain contexts of VBD, particularly in reducing thrombosis recurrence and managing postoperative complications. However, the benefits of AC are not uniformly demonstrated across all patient settings, suggesting a tailored approach to AC use in VBD might be warranted. The findings underscore the necessity for randomised controlled trials to clarify the optimal therapeutic strategies for AC in conjunction with IS in BD.
目的:behet病(BD)常伴有血管并发症,称为血管性behet病(VBD)。虽然免疫抑制(IS)是治疗的基石,但抗凝(AC)的作用仍存在争议。本系统综述旨在巩固和总结AC治疗VBD的有效性和安全性的现有证据,特别是考虑到2018年欧洲风湿病协会联盟(EULAR)推荐的新研究。方法:我们根据PRISMA指南,对PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Scopus进行了截至2024年1月的系统检索。我们纳入了调查AC对VBD结果影响的研究,使用乔安娜布里格斯研究所的工具进行数据提取和偏倚风险评估。结果:我们检索了2202篇文章,其中34项研究符合纳入标准。结果表明,使用不同抗凝剂的研究中,AC覆盖率从10.8%到98.6%不等。一些研究强调了AC在减少血栓形成事件和改善手术结果方面的显著益处,而另一些研究则显示了中性或有限的作用。安全性总体较好,显著出血发生率较低。结论:AC治疗在VBD的某些情况下是有益的,特别是在减少血栓复发和控制术后并发症方面。然而,AC的益处并没有在所有患者情况下得到统一证明,这表明在VBD中使用AC的量身定制方法可能是有必要的。研究结果强调了随机对照试验的必要性,以阐明AC联合IS治疗双相障碍的最佳治疗策略。
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Rheumatology is a bi-monthly international peer-reviewed journal which has been covering all clinical, experimental and translational aspects of musculoskeletal, arthritic and connective tissue diseases since 1983.