Elany Barbosa da Silva,Meredith J Crane,Lawrence Liu,Danielle J Gelsinger,Alexander R D Jordon,Phuong Le,Jack G Haggett,Samuel A Myers,Robin L McKinney,Craig P Eberson,Amanda M Jamieson,Anthony J O'Donoghue
{"title":"The Impact of pH on Proteolytic Activity in Wound Fluid: Implications for Acid Therapy.","authors":"Elany Barbosa da Silva,Meredith J Crane,Lawrence Liu,Danielle J Gelsinger,Alexander R D Jordon,Phuong Le,Jack G Haggett,Samuel A Myers,Robin L McKinney,Craig P Eberson,Amanda M Jamieson,Anthony J O'Donoghue","doi":"10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110723","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Wound healing necessitates a balance between synthesis and breakdown of extracellular matrix components, which is tightly regulated by proteases and their inhibitors. While studies have demonstrated that citric and acetic acid treatments enhance healing in recalcitrant wounds, the underlying proteolytic mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we systematically evaluated changes in the proteolytic activity of murine wound fluid upon acidification. A library of 228 synthetic peptides served as reporters of protease activity at pH 7.4, pH 5.0 and pH 3.5. The peptide digestion patterns differed at each pH, revealing that proteases active at pH 7.4 are inactivated at pH 3.5. Notably, cathepsin D emerged as the dominant active enzyme at pH 3.5, and its activity was inhibited by pepstatin. Using a fluorogenic substrate, we quantified cathepsin D activity across varying pH levels and demonstrated optimal activity between pH 3.0 and 3.8. This activity was detectable as early as one day post-injury and persisted over the following ten days. Importantly, human wound fluid exhibited the same activity profile, validating the mouse model as a relevant system for studying acid-mediated wound healing processes.","PeriodicalId":15140,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","volume":"1 1","pages":"110723"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Biological Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbc.2025.110723","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Wound healing necessitates a balance between synthesis and breakdown of extracellular matrix components, which is tightly regulated by proteases and their inhibitors. While studies have demonstrated that citric and acetic acid treatments enhance healing in recalcitrant wounds, the underlying proteolytic mechanisms remain elusive. In this study, we systematically evaluated changes in the proteolytic activity of murine wound fluid upon acidification. A library of 228 synthetic peptides served as reporters of protease activity at pH 7.4, pH 5.0 and pH 3.5. The peptide digestion patterns differed at each pH, revealing that proteases active at pH 7.4 are inactivated at pH 3.5. Notably, cathepsin D emerged as the dominant active enzyme at pH 3.5, and its activity was inhibited by pepstatin. Using a fluorogenic substrate, we quantified cathepsin D activity across varying pH levels and demonstrated optimal activity between pH 3.0 and 3.8. This activity was detectable as early as one day post-injury and persisted over the following ten days. Importantly, human wound fluid exhibited the same activity profile, validating the mouse model as a relevant system for studying acid-mediated wound healing processes.
期刊介绍:
The Journal of Biological Chemistry welcomes high-quality science that seeks to elucidate the molecular and cellular basis of biological processes. Papers published in JBC can therefore fall under the umbrellas of not only biological chemistry, chemical biology, or biochemistry, but also allied disciplines such as biophysics, systems biology, RNA biology, immunology, microbiology, neurobiology, epigenetics, computational biology, ’omics, and many more. The outcome of our focus on papers that contribute novel and important mechanistic insights, rather than on a particular topic area, is that JBC is truly a melting pot for scientists across disciplines. In addition, JBC welcomes papers that describe methods that will help scientists push their biochemical inquiries forward and resources that will be of use to the research community.