Feminist Solidarity or Moralized Body Politics? Online Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Communities and Feminist Health Politics

IF 3.4 1区 社会学 Q1 SOCIOLOGY
Linda Blum, K. J. Surkan
{"title":"Feminist Solidarity or Moralized Body Politics? Online Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer Communities and Feminist Health Politics","authors":"Linda Blum, K. J. Surkan","doi":"10.1177/08912432251374235","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, we extend the study of the embodied health activism of breast cancer survivors to the relatively neglected peer-to-peer groups now proliferating online. We conducted in-depth interviews during COVID-19 with individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) mutations because, with heightened risk of disease, they are unusually active online. We asked participants with diverse racial-ethnic, gender, and sexual identities about online experiences to understand solidarity and activism, particularly within the context of a neoliberal emphasis on taking individual responsibility to overcome health risks. We found that (1) most reported finding solidarity and shared experiential knowledge, yet desires for positive uplift to overcome cancer led to a moralized body politics of exclusion and individualized responsibility, and (2) such boundary making, particularly over breast reconstruction, has contradictory implications with larger lessons for social movement scholars. While boundary making builds solidarity among insiders, it threatens connections to others, as was also the case with the ideological and identitarian politics that limited second-wave feminism. In our case, boundary making limits transgressive body politics, leaving a moralized body politics of heteronormative femininity.","PeriodicalId":48351,"journal":{"name":"Gender & Society","volume":"80 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gender & Society","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/08912432251374235","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In this article, we extend the study of the embodied health activism of breast cancer survivors to the relatively neglected peer-to-peer groups now proliferating online. We conducted in-depth interviews during COVID-19 with individuals with hereditary breast and ovarian cancer (HBOC) mutations because, with heightened risk of disease, they are unusually active online. We asked participants with diverse racial-ethnic, gender, and sexual identities about online experiences to understand solidarity and activism, particularly within the context of a neoliberal emphasis on taking individual responsibility to overcome health risks. We found that (1) most reported finding solidarity and shared experiential knowledge, yet desires for positive uplift to overcome cancer led to a moralized body politics of exclusion and individualized responsibility, and (2) such boundary making, particularly over breast reconstruction, has contradictory implications with larger lessons for social movement scholars. While boundary making builds solidarity among insiders, it threatens connections to others, as was also the case with the ideological and identitarian politics that limited second-wave feminism. In our case, boundary making limits transgressive body politics, leaving a moralized body politics of heteronormative femininity.
女权主义团结还是道德化的身体政治?在线遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌社区和女权主义健康政治
在这篇文章中,我们将乳腺癌幸存者的具体健康行动主义的研究扩展到相对被忽视的点对点群体,现在在网上激增。在2019冠状病毒病期间,我们对患有遗传性乳腺癌和卵巢癌(HBOC)突变的个体进行了深入访谈,因为随着疾病风险的增加,他们在网上异常活跃。我们要求具有不同种族、性别和性身份的参与者了解在线体验,以理解团结和行动主义,特别是在新自由主义强调承担个人责任以克服健康风险的背景下。我们发现(1)大多数人报告说找到了团结和分享经验知识,然而,克服癌症的积极提升的愿望导致了一种道德的排斥和个人责任的身体政治;(2)这种边界的划定,特别是在乳房重建方面,与社会运动学者的更大教训有矛盾的含义。虽然边界划定在内部人士之间建立了团结,但它威胁到了与他人的联系,就像限制第二波女权主义的意识形态和身份政治一样。在我们的例子中,边界划定限制了越界的身体政治,留下了异性恋女性气质的道德身体政治。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Gender & Society
Gender & Society Multiple-
CiteScore
9.70
自引率
3.60%
发文量
78
期刊介绍: Gender & Society promotes feminist scholarship and the social scientific study of gender. Gender & Society publishes theoretically engaged and methodologically rigorous articles that make original contributions to gender theory. The journal takes a multidisciplinary, intersectional, and global approach to gender analyses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信