The Elimination Effect of Medical-Grade Honey on Pseudomonas aeruginosa Biofilms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

IF 2 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
Journal of clinical medicine research Pub Date : 2025-08-31 eCollection Date: 2025-08-01 DOI:10.14740/jocmr6312
Hariyudo Hariyudo, Hasan Rizky Benokri, Yohanes Widodo Wirohadidjojo, Camelia Herdini, Arief Budiyanto, Dhite Bayu Nugroho
{"title":"The Elimination Effect of Medical-Grade Honey on <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> Biofilms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.","authors":"Hariyudo Hariyudo, Hasan Rizky Benokri, Yohanes Widodo Wirohadidjojo, Camelia Herdini, Arief Budiyanto, Dhite Bayu Nugroho","doi":"10.14740/jocmr6312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of medical-grade honey (MGH) in eliminating and inhibiting <i>Pseudomonas aeruginosa</i> (<i>P. aeruginosa</i>) biofilms, which are known for their resistance to conventional antibiotics and significant role in chronic infections.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024614542), a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and EBSCO using terms related to <i>P. aeruginosa</i>, biofilm, and MGH. Inclusion criteria encompassed <i>in vitro</i> studies assessing MGH's effect on <i>P. aeruginosa</i> biofilms, with reported outcomes including biofilm inhibition and eradication. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN) tool. Publication bias was estimated through forest plot.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 1,934 records were identified from four databases. After screening and full-text review, six <i>in vitro</i> studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, and five were eligible for meta-analysis. All studies evaluated the effect of MGH, including Manuka and Surgihoney, on <i>P. aeruginosa</i> biofilms using crystal violet staining and spectrophotometric analysis. Pooled results showed that MGH significantly reduced biofilm formation (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -4.98; 95% confidence interval (CI): -6.72 to -3.25) and effectively disrupted established biofilms (SMD = -4.44; 95% CI: -6.62 to -2.26). Subgroup analysis revealed stronger effects on American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains than clinical isolates, with low within-subgroup heterogeneity. MGH also demonstrated significant superiority compared to active biofilm controls, although sterility control comparisons showed high variability. Mechanistic analysis found that Medihoney outperformed sugar solutions and methylglyoxal (MGO) alone, suggesting that its antibiofilm activity results from synergistic bioactive compounds. Overall, these findings support MGH as a potent antibiofilm agent, warranting further research for clinical application against <i>P. aeruginosa</i> biofilm infections.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>MGH exhibits consistent and substantial anti-biofilm activity against <i>P. aeruginosa in vitro</i>, affecting both biofilm formation and established biofilms. These findings support its potential application as a topical therapeutic agent in managing biofilm-related infections, particularly in chronic wounds. Future research should prioritize standardized application protocols and investigate synergistic effects with conventional antimicrobials through clinical trials.</p>","PeriodicalId":94329,"journal":{"name":"Journal of clinical medicine research","volume":"17 8","pages":"445-459"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12434934/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of clinical medicine research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14740/jocmr6312","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/8/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This systematic review aimed to evaluate the efficacy of medical-grade honey (MGH) in eliminating and inhibiting Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) biofilms, which are known for their resistance to conventional antibiotics and significant role in chronic infections.

Methods: Following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis (PRISMA) guidelines and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024614542), a systematic search was conducted across PubMed, ProQuest, Scopus, and EBSCO using terms related to P. aeruginosa, biofilm, and MGH. Inclusion criteria encompassed in vitro studies assessing MGH's effect on P. aeruginosa biofilms, with reported outcomes including biofilm inhibition and eradication. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessment were performed independently by two reviewers using the Quality Assessment Tool for In Vitro Studies (QUIN) tool. Publication bias was estimated through forest plot.

Results: A total of 1,934 records were identified from four databases. After screening and full-text review, six in vitro studies met the inclusion criteria for qualitative synthesis, and five were eligible for meta-analysis. All studies evaluated the effect of MGH, including Manuka and Surgihoney, on P. aeruginosa biofilms using crystal violet staining and spectrophotometric analysis. Pooled results showed that MGH significantly reduced biofilm formation (standardized mean difference (SMD) = -4.98; 95% confidence interval (CI): -6.72 to -3.25) and effectively disrupted established biofilms (SMD = -4.44; 95% CI: -6.62 to -2.26). Subgroup analysis revealed stronger effects on American Type Culture Collection (ATCC) strains than clinical isolates, with low within-subgroup heterogeneity. MGH also demonstrated significant superiority compared to active biofilm controls, although sterility control comparisons showed high variability. Mechanistic analysis found that Medihoney outperformed sugar solutions and methylglyoxal (MGO) alone, suggesting that its antibiofilm activity results from synergistic bioactive compounds. Overall, these findings support MGH as a potent antibiofilm agent, warranting further research for clinical application against P. aeruginosa biofilm infections.

Conclusion: MGH exhibits consistent and substantial anti-biofilm activity against P. aeruginosa in vitro, affecting both biofilm formation and established biofilms. These findings support its potential application as a topical therapeutic agent in managing biofilm-related infections, particularly in chronic wounds. Future research should prioritize standardized application protocols and investigate synergistic effects with conventional antimicrobials through clinical trials.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

药用级蜂蜜对铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的消除作用:系统综述和荟萃分析。
背景:本系统综述旨在评价医用级蜂蜜(MGH)消除和抑制铜绿假单胞菌(P. aeruginosa)生物膜的功效,铜绿假单胞菌对常规抗生素具有耐药性,在慢性感染中起重要作用。方法:遵循系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,并在PROSPERO (CRD42024614542)中注册,使用与P. aeruginosa、生物膜和MGH相关的术语在PubMed、ProQuest、Scopus和EBSCO中进行系统检索。纳入标准包括评估MGH对铜绿假单胞菌生物膜影响的体外研究,报告的结果包括生物膜抑制和根除。数据提取和偏倚风险评估由两名审稿人使用体外研究质量评估工具(QUIN)工具独立进行。通过森林图估计发表偏倚。结果:从4个数据库中共鉴定出1934条记录。经过筛选和全文审查,6个体外研究符合定性综合的纳入标准,5个符合meta分析的条件。所有的研究,包括Manuka和Surgihoney,都用结晶紫染色和分光光度法分析了MGH对铜绿假单胞菌生物膜的影响。综合结果显示,MGH显著减少了生物膜的形成(标准化平均差(SMD) = -4.98;95%置信区间(CI): -6.72至-3.25),有效破坏了已建立的生物膜(SMD = -4.44; 95% CI: -6.62至-2.26)。亚组分析显示,美国型培养收集(ATCC)菌株的作用强于临床分离株,亚组内异质性较低。与活性生物膜对照相比,MGH也显示出显著的优势,尽管无菌对照显示出高变异性。机制分析发现,Medihoney的抗生物膜活性优于单独的糖溶液和甲基乙二醛(MGO),表明其抗生物膜活性是由协同生物活性化合物产生的。总的来说,这些发现支持MGH作为一种有效的抗生物膜剂,值得进一步研究用于抗铜绿假单胞菌生物膜感染的临床应用。结论:MGH在体外对铜绿假单胞菌具有一致且显著的抗生物膜活性,影响生物膜的形成和已建立的生物膜。这些发现支持其作为治疗生物膜相关感染的局部治疗剂的潜在应用,特别是在慢性伤口。未来的研究应优先考虑标准化的应用方案,并通过临床试验研究与常规抗菌素的协同效应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信