ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY OF INCISIONAL AND NEEDLE BIOPSY IN SOFT-TISSUE TUMORS IN A BRAZILIAN CENTER OF REFERENCE.

IF 0.6 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS
Acta Ortopedica Brasileira Pub Date : 2025-09-08 eCollection Date: 2025-01-01 DOI:10.1590/1413-785220253304e290125
Bruna Canteri Delocco, Bruno de Oliveira Fiorelli, Igor Borges Abrantes, Eliane Dos Santos Luz, Ana Cristina de Sá Lopes, Walter Meohas
{"title":"ASSESSMENT OF ACCURACY OF INCISIONAL AND NEEDLE BIOPSY IN SOFT-TISSUE TUMORS IN A BRAZILIAN CENTER OF REFERENCE.","authors":"Bruna Canteri Delocco, Bruno de Oliveira Fiorelli, Igor Borges Abrantes, Eliane Dos Santos Luz, Ana Cristina de Sá Lopes, Walter Meohas","doi":"10.1590/1413-785220253304e290125","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To assess the accuracy of incisional biopsies (IB) and needle biopsies (NB) in soft-tissue tumors treated at a Brazilian center of reference, as well as the variables related to the demographic profile and treatment established.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A retrospective, descriptive and observational study was conducted with patients with malignant soft tissue tumoral lesions, of indeterminate and intermediary malignancy, subjected to IB or NB at the institution from January 2010 to December 2019.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>114 biopsies were performed in soft-tissue tumors of malignant lesions, of indeterminate and intermediary malignancy; of these 90 biopsies, 61 (67.7%) were IB and 29 (25.4%) were NB. It was necessary to perform a new collection in 5 cases among the NB (17.2%) and 1 case among the IB (1.6%). The IB accuracy was 83.6, while NB was 62.1. Of the 18 patients subjected to surgical treatment with radical margin, 7 were initially subjected to NB (36.8%) and 9 to IB (17.3%).</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>Despite the advantages inherent to the percutaneous procedure of NB, IB must still be considered a diagnostic option in soft tissue tumors with high heterogeneity and degree of necrosis. <b><i>Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test</i></b> .</p>","PeriodicalId":55563,"journal":{"name":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","volume":"33 4","pages":"e290125"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12435857/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Ortopedica Brasileira","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/1413-785220253304e290125","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the accuracy of incisional biopsies (IB) and needle biopsies (NB) in soft-tissue tumors treated at a Brazilian center of reference, as well as the variables related to the demographic profile and treatment established.

Methods: A retrospective, descriptive and observational study was conducted with patients with malignant soft tissue tumoral lesions, of indeterminate and intermediary malignancy, subjected to IB or NB at the institution from January 2010 to December 2019.

Results: 114 biopsies were performed in soft-tissue tumors of malignant lesions, of indeterminate and intermediary malignancy; of these 90 biopsies, 61 (67.7%) were IB and 29 (25.4%) were NB. It was necessary to perform a new collection in 5 cases among the NB (17.2%) and 1 case among the IB (1.6%). The IB accuracy was 83.6, while NB was 62.1. Of the 18 patients subjected to surgical treatment with radical margin, 7 were initially subjected to NB (36.8%) and 9 to IB (17.3%).

Conclusion: Despite the advantages inherent to the percutaneous procedure of NB, IB must still be considered a diagnostic option in soft tissue tumors with high heterogeneity and degree of necrosis. Level of Evidence III; Diagnostic Studies - Investigating a Diagnostic Test .

在巴西一个参考中心评估软组织肿瘤的切口和穿刺活检的准确性。
目的:评估在巴西参考中心治疗的软组织肿瘤的切口活检(IB)和针活检(NB)的准确性,以及与人口统计资料和治疗方法相关的变量。方法:对2010年1月至2019年12月在该机构接受IB或NB治疗的不确定和中间恶性软组织肿瘤病变患者进行回顾性、描述性和观察性研究。结果:软组织肿瘤恶性病变、不确定恶性和中间恶性114例;90例活检中,IB 61例(67.7%),NB 29例(25.4%)。NB组5例(17.2%),IB组1例(1.6%)需要重新采集。IB准确率为83.6,NB准确率为62.1。在18例接受根治性切缘手术治疗的患者中,7例最初接受NB(36.8%), 9例最初接受IB(17.3%)。结论:尽管经皮NB手术具有固有的优势,但对于具有高度异质性和坏死程度的软组织肿瘤,IB仍然必须被视为一种诊断选择。证据等级III;诊断研究-调查诊断测试。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
14.30%
发文量
67
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊介绍: A Revista Acta Ortopédica Brasileira, órgão oficial do Departamento de Ortopedia e Traumatologia da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo (DOT/FMUSP), é publicada bimestralmente em seis edições ao ano (jan/fev, mar/abr, maio/jun, jul/ago, set/out e nov/dez) com versão em inglês disponível nos principais indexadores nacionais e internacionais e instituições de ensino do Brasil. Sendo hoje reconhecidamente uma importante contribuição para os especialistas da área com sua seriedade e árduo trabalho para as indexações já conquistadas.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信