Review of chatbots in urogynecology.

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY
Joseph T Kowalski, Leanne Brechtel
{"title":"Review of chatbots in urogynecology.","authors":"Joseph T Kowalski, Leanne Brechtel","doi":"10.1097/GCO.0000000000001067","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose of review: </strong>Chatbots based on large language models have been rapidly incorporated into many aspects of medicine in a short time despite an incomplete understanding of their capabilities. This review focuses on ways these chatbots have been utilized in urogynecology.</p><p><strong>Recent findings: </strong>Publications regarding chatbots in urogynecology have centered on patient education, scientific literature review, clinical decision-making, documentation, and research. Several authors have evaluated the ability of chatbots to generate accurate and complete information about prolapse and urinary incontinence. While chatbots can generate accurate information about pelvic floor disorders most of the time, the studies we review indicate that incomplete, misleading, or incorrect information is generated up to 33% of the time. Newer chatbots that are trained for medical applications may help to limit some of these problems. Using chatbots to assist with scientific literature review and research is currently hampered by unpredictable 'hallucinations', where the chatbot may generate information or references that sound plausible but are factually incorrect.</p><p><strong>Summary: </strong>While chatbots are being rapidly integrated into many aspects of medicine, the research evaluating these tools in urogynecology is limited. Publicly available chatbots should only be used for patient education, clinical decision-making, and research with caution.</p>","PeriodicalId":55194,"journal":{"name":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Opinion in Obstetrics & Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/GCO.0000000000001067","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose of review: Chatbots based on large language models have been rapidly incorporated into many aspects of medicine in a short time despite an incomplete understanding of their capabilities. This review focuses on ways these chatbots have been utilized in urogynecology.

Recent findings: Publications regarding chatbots in urogynecology have centered on patient education, scientific literature review, clinical decision-making, documentation, and research. Several authors have evaluated the ability of chatbots to generate accurate and complete information about prolapse and urinary incontinence. While chatbots can generate accurate information about pelvic floor disorders most of the time, the studies we review indicate that incomplete, misleading, or incorrect information is generated up to 33% of the time. Newer chatbots that are trained for medical applications may help to limit some of these problems. Using chatbots to assist with scientific literature review and research is currently hampered by unpredictable 'hallucinations', where the chatbot may generate information or references that sound plausible but are factually incorrect.

Summary: While chatbots are being rapidly integrated into many aspects of medicine, the research evaluating these tools in urogynecology is limited. Publicly available chatbots should only be used for patient education, clinical decision-making, and research with caution.

泌尿妇科聊天机器人研究综述。
综述目的:基于大型语言模型的聊天机器人在短时间内迅速融入医学的许多方面,尽管人们对它们的能力还不完全了解。本文综述了这些聊天机器人在泌尿妇科的应用。最近的发现:关于泌尿妇科聊天机器人的出版物主要集中在患者教育、科学文献综述、临床决策、文档和研究方面。几位作者已经评估了聊天机器人产生关于脱垂和尿失禁的准确和完整信息的能力。虽然聊天机器人在大多数情况下都能产生关于盆底疾病的准确信息,但我们回顾的研究表明,不完整、误导性或不正确的信息在33%的情况下会产生。为医疗应用而训练的新型聊天机器人可能有助于限制其中的一些问题。目前,使用聊天机器人协助科学文献综述和研究受到不可预测的“幻觉”的阻碍,在这种情况下,聊天机器人可能会产生听起来合理但实际上不正确的信息或参考。摘要:虽然聊天机器人正在迅速融入医学的许多方面,但评估这些工具在泌尿妇科的研究是有限的。公开可用的聊天机器人只应谨慎用于患者教育、临床决策和研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
104
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: ​​​​​​​Current Opinion in Obstetrics and Gynecology is a bimonthly publication offering a unique and wide ranging perspective on the key developments in the field. Each issue features hand-picked review articles from our team of expert editors. With eleven disciplines published across the year – including reproductive endocrinology, gynecologic cancer and fertility– every issue also contains annotated references detailing the merits of the most important papers.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信