Short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without preservation of the splenic vessels: splenic vessel-preserving procedure is a "double-edged sword" in left-sided portal hypertension.
{"title":"Short- and long-term outcomes after minimally invasive spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy with and without preservation of the splenic vessels: splenic vessel-preserving procedure is a \"double-edged sword\" in left-sided portal hypertension.","authors":"Yusuke Watanabe, Kohei Nakata, Toshiya Abe, Noboru Ideno, Naoki Ikenaga, Masafumi Nakamura","doi":"10.1007/s00464-025-12167-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) involves splenic vessel preservation (Kimura procedure) and splenic vessel resection (Warshaw procedure). This study evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of the minimally invasive (MI) Kimura and Warshaw SPDP.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Medical records of 137 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo MI-SPDP (Kimura group, n = 72; Warshaw group, n = 65) between 2012 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The completion rate of the planned procedures was significantly lower in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (78% vs. 92%, P = 0.03). However, the patients experienced no major disadvantages due to procedural conversion. Most short-term outcomes were comparable between groups, with the exception of splenic infarction. The prevalence of radiological splenic infarction was significantly lower in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (5% vs. 38%, P < 0.01), although the splenic infarctions were clinically harmless. The incidence of perigastric and gastric intramural venous dilatation confirmed on computed tomography during follow-up was significantly lower in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (46% vs. 87%, P < 0.01; 21% vs. 39%, P = 0.04, respectively). The postoperative changes in splenic volume were significantly smaller in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (median, 17% vs. 28%, P = 0.04). However, 41% of patients in the Kimura group developed postoperative splenic venous stenosis during follow-up, most of whom had left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH), and postoperative splenic volume changes were significantly greater than those in patients who underwent the Warshaw procedure (median, 42% vs. 28%, P = 0.01).</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In clinical practice, the short- and long-term outcomes of patients after both procedures were comparable. The Kimura procedure carries the potential risk of postoperative splenic venous stenosis during the follow-up period, which causes LSPH. Establishing the patient selection criteria and suitable surgical procedures to prevent splenic venous stenosis after the MI Kimura procedure is required.</p>","PeriodicalId":22174,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Endoscopy And Other Interventional Techniques","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-025-12167-5","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Background: Spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy (SPDP) involves splenic vessel preservation (Kimura procedure) and splenic vessel resection (Warshaw procedure). This study evaluated the short- and long-term outcomes of the minimally invasive (MI) Kimura and Warshaw SPDP.
Methods: Medical records of 137 consecutive patients scheduled to undergo MI-SPDP (Kimura group, n = 72; Warshaw group, n = 65) between 2012 and 2024 were retrospectively reviewed.
Results: The completion rate of the planned procedures was significantly lower in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (78% vs. 92%, P = 0.03). However, the patients experienced no major disadvantages due to procedural conversion. Most short-term outcomes were comparable between groups, with the exception of splenic infarction. The prevalence of radiological splenic infarction was significantly lower in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (5% vs. 38%, P < 0.01), although the splenic infarctions were clinically harmless. The incidence of perigastric and gastric intramural venous dilatation confirmed on computed tomography during follow-up was significantly lower in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (46% vs. 87%, P < 0.01; 21% vs. 39%, P = 0.04, respectively). The postoperative changes in splenic volume were significantly smaller in the Kimura group than in the Warshaw group (median, 17% vs. 28%, P = 0.04). However, 41% of patients in the Kimura group developed postoperative splenic venous stenosis during follow-up, most of whom had left-sided portal hypertension (LSPH), and postoperative splenic volume changes were significantly greater than those in patients who underwent the Warshaw procedure (median, 42% vs. 28%, P = 0.01).
Conclusions: In clinical practice, the short- and long-term outcomes of patients after both procedures were comparable. The Kimura procedure carries the potential risk of postoperative splenic venous stenosis during the follow-up period, which causes LSPH. Establishing the patient selection criteria and suitable surgical procedures to prevent splenic venous stenosis after the MI Kimura procedure is required.
背景:保脾远端胰腺切除术(SPDP)包括保留脾血管(Kimura手术)和切除脾血管(Warshaw手术)。本研究评估了微创(MI) Kimura和Warshaw SPDP的短期和长期结果。方法:回顾性分析2012年至2024年间连续137例MI-SPDP患者(Kimura组,n = 72; Warshaw组,n = 65)的病历。结果:Kimura组计划手术的完成率明显低于Warshaw组(78% vs. 92%, P = 0.03)。然而,由于手术转换,患者没有经历重大的缺点。除脾梗死外,两组间大多数短期结果具有可比性。Kimura组放射性脾梗死的发生率明显低于Warshaw组(5% vs. 38%)。结论:在临床实践中,两种手术后患者的短期和长期预后具有可比性。Kimura手术在随访期间存在术后脾静脉狭窄的潜在风险,从而导致LSPH。需要建立患者选择标准和合适的手术方法,以防止木村手术后脾静脉狭窄。
期刊介绍:
Uniquely positioned at the interface between various medical and surgical disciplines, Surgical Endoscopy serves as a focal point for the international surgical community to exchange information on practice, theory, and research.
Topics covered in the journal include:
-Surgical aspects of:
Interventional endoscopy,
Ultrasound,
Other techniques in the fields of gastroenterology, obstetrics, gynecology, and urology,
-Gastroenterologic surgery
-Thoracic surgery
-Traumatic surgery
-Orthopedic surgery
-Pediatric surgery