Preference-oriented quality of life monitoring and linkage with clinical registry data: study protocol of a randomised clinical trial in patients with lung cancer (LePaLuMo Study).

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL
Trials Pub Date : 2025-09-16 DOI:10.1186/s13063-025-09102-3
Patricia Lindberg-Scharf, Martin Emmert, Michael Koller, Florian Gürtler, Brunhilde Steinger, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn, Florian Zeman, Sophie Friebel, Ksenia Ibler, Jan Kurz, Thomas Stangl, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Vinzenz Völkel
{"title":"Preference-oriented quality of life monitoring and linkage with clinical registry data: study protocol of a randomised clinical trial in patients with lung cancer (LePaLuMo Study).","authors":"Patricia Lindberg-Scharf, Martin Emmert, Michael Koller, Florian Gürtler, Brunhilde Steinger, Jacqueline Müller-Nordhorn, Florian Zeman, Sophie Friebel, Ksenia Ibler, Jan Kurz, Thomas Stangl, Monika Klinkhammer-Schalke, Vinzenz Völkel","doi":"10.1186/s13063-025-09102-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>In routine oncological care, the implementation of disease-related quality of life (QoL) is still an open matter. In a complex intervention, a QoL monitoring system including tailored therapeutic options has been designed, implemented, and its effectiveness has been demonstrated in two randomised trials in patients with breast and colorectal cancer. The next step is to extend the usability of the QoL monitoring system for patients with other cancer diagnoses and in other regions. Necessary adaptations include an electronic measurement of QoL and consideration of patient and physician preferences. The present randomised trial investigates the effectiveness of this adapted QoL monitoring system in patients with lung cancer in two regions in Bavaria, Germany.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>In this 2-arm randomised, prospective, pragmatic, multicentre clinical trial with one intervention and one control group, QoL of primary lung cancer patients is assessed with an electronic patient- and physician-oriented QoL monitoring system using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC29 questionnaires at study entry and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months during follow-up care. The QoL data of each patient are linked with clinical data from the Bavarian Cancer Registry for the purpose of data analysis. In the intervention group, the results of QoL monitoring are automatically transferred to a QoL profile including 8 dimensions on scales of 0-100 (cut-off \"need for QoL therapy\" < 50 points). QoL results are obtained in real-time by patients and their treating physicians. To treat QoL deficits, a multi-professional network of healthcare providers is established. In the control group, QoL is also measured, but neither patients nor treating physicians have access to the results. The investigators expect that the proportion of patients in both groups with a need for QoL therapy (< 50 points in at least one dimension of the QoL profile) will be lower in the intervention group than in the control group at the primary endpoint 6 months after study entry.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>This is the first study investigating the effectiveness of a QoL monitoring system based on patient- and physician-oriented preferences with a high degree of generalisability by including inpatient and outpatient care as well as different study regions.</p><p><strong>Trial registration: </strong>ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06252233. Registered on February 2024.</p>","PeriodicalId":23333,"journal":{"name":"Trials","volume":"26 1","pages":"339"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12439385/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Trials","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-025-09102-3","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, RESEARCH & EXPERIMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In routine oncological care, the implementation of disease-related quality of life (QoL) is still an open matter. In a complex intervention, a QoL monitoring system including tailored therapeutic options has been designed, implemented, and its effectiveness has been demonstrated in two randomised trials in patients with breast and colorectal cancer. The next step is to extend the usability of the QoL monitoring system for patients with other cancer diagnoses and in other regions. Necessary adaptations include an electronic measurement of QoL and consideration of patient and physician preferences. The present randomised trial investigates the effectiveness of this adapted QoL monitoring system in patients with lung cancer in two regions in Bavaria, Germany.

Methods: In this 2-arm randomised, prospective, pragmatic, multicentre clinical trial with one intervention and one control group, QoL of primary lung cancer patients is assessed with an electronic patient- and physician-oriented QoL monitoring system using the EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-LC29 questionnaires at study entry and at 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 months during follow-up care. The QoL data of each patient are linked with clinical data from the Bavarian Cancer Registry for the purpose of data analysis. In the intervention group, the results of QoL monitoring are automatically transferred to a QoL profile including 8 dimensions on scales of 0-100 (cut-off "need for QoL therapy" < 50 points). QoL results are obtained in real-time by patients and their treating physicians. To treat QoL deficits, a multi-professional network of healthcare providers is established. In the control group, QoL is also measured, but neither patients nor treating physicians have access to the results. The investigators expect that the proportion of patients in both groups with a need for QoL therapy (< 50 points in at least one dimension of the QoL profile) will be lower in the intervention group than in the control group at the primary endpoint 6 months after study entry.

Discussion: This is the first study investigating the effectiveness of a QoL monitoring system based on patient- and physician-oriented preferences with a high degree of generalisability by including inpatient and outpatient care as well as different study regions.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06252233. Registered on February 2024.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

以偏好为导向的生活质量监测和与临床注册数据的联系:肺癌患者随机临床试验的研究方案(LePaLuMo研究)
背景:在常规肿瘤治疗中,疾病相关生活质量(QoL)的实施仍然是一个开放的问题。在一项复杂的干预措施中,设计并实施了一套生活质量监测系统,包括量身定制的治疗方案,并在两项针对乳腺癌和结直肠癌患者的随机试验中证明了其有效性。下一步是扩大生活质量监测系统在其他癌症诊断患者和其他地区的可用性。必要的调整包括电子测量生活质量和考虑患者和医生的偏好。目前的随机试验调查了德国巴伐利亚州两个地区肺癌患者适应生活质量监测系统的有效性。方法:在这项两组随机、前瞻性、实用的多中心临床试验中,一项干预和一组对照组,在研究开始时和随访期间的1、2、3、4、5和6个月,使用EORTC QLQ-C30和QLQ-LC29问卷,使用面向患者和医生的电子生活质量监测系统评估原发性肺癌患者的生活质量。每个患者的生活质量数据与巴伐利亚癌症登记处的临床数据相关联,以便进行数据分析。在干预组,生活质量监测的结果被自动转移到生活质量概况,包括8个维度,范围为0-100(截止“生活质量治疗的需要”)。讨论:这是第一个调查生活质量监测系统有效性的研究,该系统基于患者和医生为导向的偏好,具有高度的普遍性,包括住院和门诊护理以及不同的研究区域。试验注册:ClinicalTrials.gov NCT06252233。注册于2024年2月。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Trials
Trials 医学-医学:研究与实验
CiteScore
3.80
自引率
4.00%
发文量
966
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Trials is an open access, peer-reviewed, online journal that will encompass all aspects of the performance and findings of randomized controlled trials. Trials will experiment with, and then refine, innovative approaches to improving communication about trials. We are keen to move beyond publishing traditional trial results articles (although these will be included). We believe this represents an exciting opportunity to advance the science and reporting of trials. Prior to 2006, Trials was published as Current Controlled Trials in Cardiovascular Medicine (CCTCVM). All published CCTCVM articles are available via the Trials website and citations to CCTCVM article URLs will continue to be supported.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信