Updates in Lung Cancer Screening: A Decade of Evidence.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q2 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE
Lori Sakoda, Louise Henderson
{"title":"Updates in Lung Cancer Screening: A Decade of Evidence.","authors":"Lori Sakoda, Louise Henderson","doi":"10.1055/a-2701-9312","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>To be addedIn this review, we summarize recent evidence from approximately the last five years across the lung cancer screening (LCS) care continuum. First, we review the results from the NELSON trial, from the extended follow-up of other LCS randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and from a meta-analysis of RCTs. Together, these RCTs reported a 16% relative reduction in lung cancer mortality for LDCT LCS versus non-LDCT controls. Next, we summarize updates to clinical guidelines and recommendations around LCS in the United States, noting the current debate around the use of time since quit as an eligibility criterion. We also discuss the implementation of LCS focusing on the following areas: (i) global landscape, (ii) selection criteria and approach, (iii) LCS program structure, (iv) shared decision making, (v) smoking cessation, (vi) LCS uptake, (vii) American College of Radiology Lung Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS), (viii) annual LCS adherence, (ix) screen-detected findings and management, (x) incidental findings and management, and (xi) disparities. Lastly, we highlight emerging data and considerations for personalized LCS and new technologies, with an emphasis on risk prediction models, biomarkers, and artificial intelligence. This review highlights the latest changes to LCS and the ongoing need to monitor and evaluate LCS as it diffuses into clinical practice across various real-world settings.</p>","PeriodicalId":21727,"journal":{"name":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/a-2701-9312","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

To be addedIn this review, we summarize recent evidence from approximately the last five years across the lung cancer screening (LCS) care continuum. First, we review the results from the NELSON trial, from the extended follow-up of other LCS randomized controlled trials (RCTs), and from a meta-analysis of RCTs. Together, these RCTs reported a 16% relative reduction in lung cancer mortality for LDCT LCS versus non-LDCT controls. Next, we summarize updates to clinical guidelines and recommendations around LCS in the United States, noting the current debate around the use of time since quit as an eligibility criterion. We also discuss the implementation of LCS focusing on the following areas: (i) global landscape, (ii) selection criteria and approach, (iii) LCS program structure, (iv) shared decision making, (v) smoking cessation, (vi) LCS uptake, (vii) American College of Radiology Lung Reporting and Data System (Lung-RADS), (viii) annual LCS adherence, (ix) screen-detected findings and management, (x) incidental findings and management, and (xi) disparities. Lastly, we highlight emerging data and considerations for personalized LCS and new technologies, with an emphasis on risk prediction models, biomarkers, and artificial intelligence. This review highlights the latest changes to LCS and the ongoing need to monitor and evaluate LCS as it diffuses into clinical practice across various real-world settings.

肺癌筛查的最新进展:十年的证据。
需要补充的是,在本综述中,我们总结了近5年来肺癌筛查(LCS)护理连续体的最新证据。首先,我们回顾了NELSON试验、其他LCS随机对照试验(rct)的扩展随访以及rct的荟萃分析的结果。总之,这些随机对照试验报告了LDCT组与非LDCT组相比肺癌死亡率相对降低16%。接下来,我们总结了美国LCS临床指南和建议的更新,并注意到目前围绕使用戒烟时间作为资格标准的争论。我们还讨论了LCS的实施,重点关注以下方面:(i)全球概况,(ii)选择标准和方法,(iii) LCS项目结构,(iv)共同决策,(v)戒烟,(vi) LCS的吸收,(vii)美国放射学会肺部报告和数据系统(Lung- rads), (viii)每年LCS的依从性,(ix)筛查发现和管理,(x)偶然发现和管理,(xi)差异。最后,我们强调了个性化LCS和新技术的新兴数据和考虑因素,重点是风险预测模型,生物标志物和人工智能。这篇综述强调了LCS的最新变化,以及随着LCS在各种现实环境中扩散到临床实践中,对其进行监测和评估的持续需求。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.The journal focuses on new diagnostic and therapeutic procedures, laboratory studies, genetic breakthroughs, pathology, clinical features and management as related to such areas as asthma and other lung diseases, critical care management, cystic fibrosis, lung and heart transplantation, pulmonary pathogens, and pleural disease as well as many other related disorders.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信