Population-Wide mHealth Interventions Promoting Healthy Movement Behaviors: Systematic Review of the Real-World Evidence.

IF 2.6 4区 医学 Q2 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH
Journal of physical activity & health Pub Date : 2025-09-16 Print Date: 2025-10-01 DOI:10.1123/jpah.2025-0151
Sarah Edney, Jacqueline L Mair, Thitikorn Topothai, Xin Hui Chua, Wan Xin Esther Na, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider
{"title":"Population-Wide mHealth Interventions Promoting Healthy Movement Behaviors: Systematic Review of the Real-World Evidence.","authors":"Sarah Edney, Jacqueline L Mair, Thitikorn Topothai, Xin Hui Chua, Wan Xin Esther Na, Falk Müller-Riemenschneider","doi":"10.1123/jpah.2025-0151","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Mobile health (mHealth) interventions offer scalable opportunities to promote healthy movement behaviors, but their real-world effectiveness and implementation remain unclear. This review aims to evaluate scaled-up mHealth interventions targeting physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep at a population level and in real-world settings using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Systematic searches were conducted across 5 databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). Studies were included if they targeted an entire population or population group, used mHealth, promoted at least one movement behavior, and reported RE-AIM-related outcomes (RE-AIM) either implicitly or explicitly. Study and intervention characteristics alongside RE-AIM-related indicators were extracted and synthesized narratively.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>From 9385 records, 43 studies reporting on 24 interventions were included. All were nonrandomized studies and targeted physical activity, with 21.0% also addressing sedentary behavior and 4.8% including sleep. Median reporting across RE-AIM indicators was 6.5 out of 14, with Reach most commonly reported (3 out of 4 indicators), followed by Implementation (2 out of 4), Maintenance (1 out of 2), Effectiveness (1 out of 2), and Adoption (0 out of 2). Representativeness was often assessed by age and sex, but rarely by socioeconomic status or ethnicity. Most interventions had positive effects on movement behavior, and 9.5% assessed cost-effectiveness.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>While mHealth interventions show promise for promoting movement behaviors, gaps in evaluation and reporting persist, limiting our understanding of their real-world impact. Future research should prioritize rigorous evaluations and comprehensive reporting to strengthen the case for scalable, sustainable mHealth interventions.</p>","PeriodicalId":16812,"journal":{"name":"Journal of physical activity & health","volume":" ","pages":"1218-1230"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of physical activity & health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1123/jpah.2025-0151","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/10/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"Print","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Mobile health (mHealth) interventions offer scalable opportunities to promote healthy movement behaviors, but their real-world effectiveness and implementation remain unclear. This review aims to evaluate scaled-up mHealth interventions targeting physical activity, sedentary behavior, and sleep at a population level and in real-world settings using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance (RE-AIM) framework.

Methods: Systematic searches were conducted across 5 databases (PubMed, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and PsycINFO). Studies were included if they targeted an entire population or population group, used mHealth, promoted at least one movement behavior, and reported RE-AIM-related outcomes (RE-AIM) either implicitly or explicitly. Study and intervention characteristics alongside RE-AIM-related indicators were extracted and synthesized narratively.

Results: From 9385 records, 43 studies reporting on 24 interventions were included. All were nonrandomized studies and targeted physical activity, with 21.0% also addressing sedentary behavior and 4.8% including sleep. Median reporting across RE-AIM indicators was 6.5 out of 14, with Reach most commonly reported (3 out of 4 indicators), followed by Implementation (2 out of 4), Maintenance (1 out of 2), Effectiveness (1 out of 2), and Adoption (0 out of 2). Representativeness was often assessed by age and sex, but rarely by socioeconomic status or ethnicity. Most interventions had positive effects on movement behavior, and 9.5% assessed cost-effectiveness.

Conclusions: While mHealth interventions show promise for promoting movement behaviors, gaps in evaluation and reporting persist, limiting our understanding of their real-world impact. Future research should prioritize rigorous evaluations and comprehensive reporting to strengthen the case for scalable, sustainable mHealth interventions.

全民移动健康干预促进健康运动行为:对现实世界证据的系统回顾。
背景:移动健康(mHealth)干预措施为促进健康的运动行为提供了可扩展的机会,但其现实世界的有效性和实施仍不清楚。本综述旨在使用Reach、有效性、采用、实施、维护(RE-AIM)框架,在人群水平和现实环境中评估针对身体活动、久坐行为和睡眠的大规模移动健康干预措施。方法:系统检索5个数据库(PubMed、Embase、Scopus、Web of Science和PsycINFO)。如果研究针对整个人群或人群群体,使用移动健康,促进至少一种运动行为,并含蓄或明确地报告RE-AIM相关结果(RE-AIM),则纳入研究。提取和综合研究和干预特征以及re - aim相关指标。结果:从9385份记录中,纳入了43项研究,报告了24项干预措施。所有研究都是非随机的,目标是身体活动,其中21.0%的研究还涉及久坐行为,4.8%包括睡眠。RE-AIM指标的报告中位数为14个指标中的6.5个,其中Reach最常见(4个指标中的3个),其次是实施(4个指标中的2个),维护(2个指标中的1个),有效性(2个指标中的1个)和采用(2个指标中的0个)。代表性通常以年龄和性别来评估,但很少以社会经济地位或种族来评估。大多数干预措施对运动行为有积极影响,9.5%的干预措施评估了成本效益。结论:虽然移动健康干预显示出促进运动行为的希望,但评估和报告方面的差距仍然存在,限制了我们对其现实影响的理解。未来的研究应优先考虑严格的评估和全面的报告,以加强可扩展的、可持续的移动健康干预措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Journal of physical activity & health
Journal of physical activity & health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
3.20%
发文量
100
期刊介绍: The Journal of Physical Activity and Health (JPAH) publishes original research and review papers examining the relationship between physical activity and health, studying physical activity as an exposure as well as an outcome. As an exposure, the journal publishes articles examining how physical activity influences all aspects of health. As an outcome, the journal invites papers that examine the behavioral, community, and environmental interventions that may affect physical activity on an individual and/or population basis. The JPAH is an interdisciplinary journal published for researchers in fields of chronic disease.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信