{"title":"Ultrasound-guided comparison of needle decompression sites in obese patients: a prospective observational study.","authors":"Furkan Alkan, Volkan Ülker, Şükrü Koçkan, Hikmet Kılınç, Şahin Kaymaz Seher, Asim Enes Ozbek, Hüseyin Cahit Halhallı","doi":"10.1007/s11739-025-04110-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The optimal site for needle decompression in tension pneumothorax patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 remains debated. This study aimed to identify the most suitable site-second intercostal space at the midclavicular line (2nd ICS in the MCL) or fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line (5th ICS in the MAL)-by comparing skin-to-pleura distances using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Skin-to-pleura distance measurements at the right 2nd ICS-MCL and the right 5th ICS in the MAL, assessed by three different operators. The primary outcome was to compare the skin-to-pleura distances at the 2nd ICS in the MCL and the 5th ICS in the MAL using POCUS in volunteers with a BMI over 30. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the consistency of different operators in determining the most appropriate site for needle decompression in the management of tension pneumothorax among healthy volunteers with a BMI over 30, using bedside ultrasonography. A total of ninety-one volunteers were enrolled. The skin-to-pleura distance at the 5th ICS in the MAL was found to be statistically significantly greater than that at the 2nd ICS in the MCL in the measurements performed by each operator (Operator 1: p = 0.016; Operator 2: p = 0.002; Operator 3: p = 0.006). The MCL measurements obtained by all three operators demonstrated statistically significant agreement. In obese patients, the 2nd ICS-MCL may be considered the preferred site for needle decompression. Nevertheless, individualized assessment of both sites using bedside ultrasonography is recommended to optimize procedural success and reduce complications.</p>","PeriodicalId":13662,"journal":{"name":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Internal and Emergency Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s11739-025-04110-2","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
The optimal site for needle decompression in tension pneumothorax patients with a body mass index (BMI) over 30 remains debated. This study aimed to identify the most suitable site-second intercostal space at the midclavicular line (2nd ICS in the MCL) or fifth intercostal space at the midaxillary line (5th ICS in the MAL)-by comparing skin-to-pleura distances using point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS). Skin-to-pleura distance measurements at the right 2nd ICS-MCL and the right 5th ICS in the MAL, assessed by three different operators. The primary outcome was to compare the skin-to-pleura distances at the 2nd ICS in the MCL and the 5th ICS in the MAL using POCUS in volunteers with a BMI over 30. The secondary outcome was to evaluate the consistency of different operators in determining the most appropriate site for needle decompression in the management of tension pneumothorax among healthy volunteers with a BMI over 30, using bedside ultrasonography. A total of ninety-one volunteers were enrolled. The skin-to-pleura distance at the 5th ICS in the MAL was found to be statistically significantly greater than that at the 2nd ICS in the MCL in the measurements performed by each operator (Operator 1: p = 0.016; Operator 2: p = 0.002; Operator 3: p = 0.006). The MCL measurements obtained by all three operators demonstrated statistically significant agreement. In obese patients, the 2nd ICS-MCL may be considered the preferred site for needle decompression. Nevertheless, individualized assessment of both sites using bedside ultrasonography is recommended to optimize procedural success and reduce complications.
期刊介绍:
Internal and Emergency Medicine (IEM) is an independent, international, English-language, peer-reviewed journal designed for internists and emergency physicians. IEM publishes a variety of manuscript types including Original investigations, Review articles, Letters to the Editor, Editorials and Commentaries. Occasionally IEM accepts unsolicited Reviews, Commentaries or Editorials. The journal is divided into three sections, i.e., Internal Medicine, Emergency Medicine and Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment, with three separate editorial boards. In the Internal Medicine section, invited Case records and Physical examinations, devoted to underlining the role of a clinical approach in selected clinical cases, are also published. The Emergency Medicine section will include a Morbidity and Mortality Report and an Airway Forum concerning the management of difficult airway problems. As far as Critical Care is becoming an integral part of Emergency Medicine, a new sub-section will report the literature that concerns the interface not only for the care of the critical patient in the Emergency Department, but also in the Intensive Care Unit. Finally, in the Clinical Evidence and Health Technology Assessment section brief discussions of topics of evidence-based medicine (Cochrane’s corner) and Research updates are published. IEM encourages letters of rebuttal and criticism of published articles. Topics of interest include all subjects that relate to the science and practice of Internal and Emergency Medicine.