No evidence for heritability of extra-pair mating behavior in a cooperatively breeding bird.

IF 3.9 2区 生物学 Q2 ECOLOGY
Sai Wei, Zhibing Li, Xin Lu
{"title":"No evidence for heritability of extra-pair mating behavior in a cooperatively breeding bird.","authors":"Sai Wei, Zhibing Li, Xin Lu","doi":"10.1038/s41437-025-00796-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>While extra-pair mating prevails among socially monogamous birds, it does not occur in all individuals within a population. Then, what underlies this variability? A poorly explored mechanism is the genetic contribution to the behavioral trait, especially for cooperatively breeding species where promiscuity may potentially conflict with the acquisition of indirect benefits to altruistic helpers. We addressed the gap through a quantitative genetic approach with 8 years of data from an individually marked population of Tibetan ground tits (Pseudopodoces humilis). Extra-pair mating was observed in 33.2% of nests, and cooperative breeding occurred in 39.5% of nests. Animal models demonstrated no significant genetic component contributing to the variance in extra-pair mating both during a specific year and over an individual's lifetime. Consequently, the heritabilities were not significantly different from zero. The lack of heritable variation in extra-pair mating can be accounted for by Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection, which suggests that genotypes associated with this behavior facilitating reproductive success should have become widespread within the population. Furthermore, the fitness benefits derived from promiscuity were greater for breeders than those from receiving help; for helpers, the fitness benefits from extra-pair mating outweighed the indirect genetic benefits obtained from providing help. This may explain why extra-pair mating and cooperative breeding can coexist in the same population. Our findings imply that individual variation in performing extra-pair mating behavior is more likely to be influenced by environmental factors.</p>","PeriodicalId":12991,"journal":{"name":"Heredity","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Heredity","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41437-025-00796-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

While extra-pair mating prevails among socially monogamous birds, it does not occur in all individuals within a population. Then, what underlies this variability? A poorly explored mechanism is the genetic contribution to the behavioral trait, especially for cooperatively breeding species where promiscuity may potentially conflict with the acquisition of indirect benefits to altruistic helpers. We addressed the gap through a quantitative genetic approach with 8 years of data from an individually marked population of Tibetan ground tits (Pseudopodoces humilis). Extra-pair mating was observed in 33.2% of nests, and cooperative breeding occurred in 39.5% of nests. Animal models demonstrated no significant genetic component contributing to the variance in extra-pair mating both during a specific year and over an individual's lifetime. Consequently, the heritabilities were not significantly different from zero. The lack of heritable variation in extra-pair mating can be accounted for by Fisher's fundamental theorem of natural selection, which suggests that genotypes associated with this behavior facilitating reproductive success should have become widespread within the population. Furthermore, the fitness benefits derived from promiscuity were greater for breeders than those from receiving help; for helpers, the fitness benefits from extra-pair mating outweighed the indirect genetic benefits obtained from providing help. This may explain why extra-pair mating and cooperative breeding can coexist in the same population. Our findings imply that individual variation in performing extra-pair mating behavior is more likely to be influenced by environmental factors.

在合作繁殖的鸟类中,没有证据表明额外的配对交配行为具有遗传性。
虽然额外配对在一夫一妻制的鸟类中很普遍,但并不是在一个种群中的所有个体中都存在。那么,是什么导致了这种差异呢?一个尚未被充分探索的机制是遗传对行为特征的贡献,特别是对于合作繁殖的物种,在这种物种中,滥交可能与利他帮助者获得间接利益的潜在冲突。33.2%的巢发生了非配对交配,39.5%的巢发生了合作繁殖。动物模型表明,在特定年份和个体一生中,没有显著的遗传成分对额外配对的差异有影响。因此,遗传力与零无显著差异。费雪的自然选择基本定理可以解释额外配对中缺乏遗传变异,该定理表明,与这种促进繁殖成功的行为相关的基因型应该在种群中广泛存在。此外,滥交带来的适应性收益大于接受帮助带来的适应性收益;对于帮助者来说,额外配对带来的健康益处超过了提供帮助所带来的间接遗传益处。这也许可以解释为什么额外配对交配和合作繁殖可以在同一种群中共存。我们的研究结果表明,个体在进行额外配对交配行为方面的差异更有可能受到环境因素的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Heredity
Heredity 生物-进化生物学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
2.60%
发文量
84
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Heredity is the official journal of the Genetics Society. It covers a broad range of topics within the field of genetics and therefore papers must address conceptual or applied issues of interest to the journal''s wide readership
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信