Navigating regulatory challenges in pediatric epilepsy pharmacotherapy: pathways to safe and effective treatments.

IF 2.7 3区 医学 Q3 PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY
Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-25 DOI:10.1080/14656566.2025.2563279
Gianmichele Villano, Gianluca D'Onofrio, Antonella Riva, Andrea Santangelo, Klaus Rose, Pasquale Striano
{"title":"Navigating regulatory challenges in pediatric epilepsy pharmacotherapy: pathways to safe and effective treatments.","authors":"Gianmichele Villano, Gianluca D'Onofrio, Antonella Riva, Andrea Santangelo, Klaus Rose, Pasquale Striano","doi":"10.1080/14656566.2025.2563279","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Drug development for epilepsy, the most frequent chronic neurologic childhood condition, faces fundamental challenges. One of these is the concept of children as 'therapeutic orphans' and the resulting pediatric requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Developing new antiseizure medications (ASMs) is expensive. Public coffers and reimbursement institutions are increasingly struggling with fundings. Commercial drug developers are progressively skeptical about the risks of developing new ASMs, which makes a critical review of pediatric requirements even more important.</p><p><strong>Areas covered: </strong>This narrative review traces the roots of pediatric drug development in epilepsy and analyses the current FDA and EMA regulatory frameworks and incentives that shape ASMs approval for children. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for publications using combinations of terms related to 'pediatric epilepsy,' 'antiseizure medications,' 'regulatory frameworks' and 'pediatric drug development.' Official FDA, EMA websites and documents were also screened.</p><p><strong>Expert opinion: </strong>A more focused and science-driven approach, less influenced by nonscientific factors and emerging conflicts of interest, could help accelerate the development of innovative treatments for epilepsy. Optimizing incentives to align research with true pediatric needs, especially those targeting childhood-specific syndromes and age-appropriate pharmacology, is essential.</p>","PeriodicalId":12184,"journal":{"name":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","volume":" ","pages":"1399-1414"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14656566.2025.2563279","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/25 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHARMACOLOGY & PHARMACY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Drug development for epilepsy, the most frequent chronic neurologic childhood condition, faces fundamental challenges. One of these is the concept of children as 'therapeutic orphans' and the resulting pediatric requirements of the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency (EMA). Developing new antiseizure medications (ASMs) is expensive. Public coffers and reimbursement institutions are increasingly struggling with fundings. Commercial drug developers are progressively skeptical about the risks of developing new ASMs, which makes a critical review of pediatric requirements even more important.

Areas covered: This narrative review traces the roots of pediatric drug development in epilepsy and analyses the current FDA and EMA regulatory frameworks and incentives that shape ASMs approval for children. PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and Google Scholar were searched for publications using combinations of terms related to 'pediatric epilepsy,' 'antiseizure medications,' 'regulatory frameworks' and 'pediatric drug development.' Official FDA, EMA websites and documents were also screened.

Expert opinion: A more focused and science-driven approach, less influenced by nonscientific factors and emerging conflicts of interest, could help accelerate the development of innovative treatments for epilepsy. Optimizing incentives to align research with true pediatric needs, especially those targeting childhood-specific syndromes and age-appropriate pharmacology, is essential.

应对儿童癫痫药物治疗中的监管挑战:安全有效的治疗途径。
癫痫是儿童最常见的慢性神经系统疾病,其药物开发面临着根本性的挑战。其中之一是儿童作为“治疗孤儿”的概念,以及由此产生的美国食品和药物管理局(FDA)和欧洲药品管理局(EMA)的儿科要求。开发新的抗癫痫药物(asm)是昂贵的。公共金库和报销机构越来越难以筹措资金。商业药物开发人员越来越怀疑开发新的asm的风险,这使得对儿科需求的批判性审查变得更加重要。涵盖领域:这篇叙述性综述追溯了儿童癫痫药物开发的根源,并分析了影响儿童asm批准的当前FDA和EMA监管框架和激励措施。PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus和谷歌 Scholar搜索了与“儿童癫痫”,“抗癫痫药物”,“监管框架”和“儿科药物开发”相关的术语组合的出版物。FDA、EMA官方网站和文件也进行了筛选。专家意见:更有针对性和科学驱动的方法,较少受非科学因素和新出现的利益冲突的影响,可能有助于加速开发创新的癫痫治疗方法。优化激励措施,使研究与真正的儿科需求保持一致,特别是针对儿童特定综合征和适合年龄的药理学的研究,这一点至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
3.10%
发文量
163
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Expert Opinion on Pharmacotherapy is a MEDLINE-indexed, peer-reviewed, international journal publishing review articles and original papers on newly approved/near to launch compounds mainly of chemical/synthetic origin, providing expert opinion on the likely impact of these new agents on existing pharmacotherapy of specific diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信