Untangling the connection between endocrine disrupting compounds, river pollution classes, and socioeconomic factors.

IF 3.8 3区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL
Sze Yee Wee, Didi Erwandi Mohamad Haron, Muhammad Raznisyafiq Razak, Norbaya Hashim, Nasehir Khan E M Yahaya, Nirmala Devi Kerisnan Kerishnan, Raja Baharudin Raja Mamat, Ahmad Zaharin Aris
{"title":"Untangling the connection between endocrine disrupting compounds, river pollution classes, and socioeconomic factors.","authors":"Sze Yee Wee, Didi Erwandi Mohamad Haron, Muhammad Raznisyafiq Razak, Norbaya Hashim, Nasehir Khan E M Yahaya, Nirmala Devi Kerisnan Kerishnan, Raja Baharudin Raja Mamat, Ahmad Zaharin Aris","doi":"10.1007/s10653-025-02760-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>The contamination of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) stands as an emerging environmental concern, leading to subsequent environmental and human exposure. A comprehensive analysis identified a total of 18 EDCs, including pharmaceuticals, hormones, and plasticizers, in Malaysian rivers classified into distinct pollution classes: \"Clean\", \"Moderately Polluted\", and \"Polluted\". The highest concentration of EDCs was observed in the \"Moderately Polluted\" Kim Kim River, notably containing 16.25 µg/L of caffeine. Caffeine exhibited ubiquitous presence across all pollution classes, with the Klang River (\"Polluted\") showing the peak concentration at 13.62 µg/L. In contrast, the \"Clean\" Kuantan River displayed the highest EDC concentration at 1.28 µg/L of bisphenol A. All individual EDCs posed negligible ecological risks, with RQ values below 0.01 (RQ<sub>m</sub> < 8.70 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup>). Similarly, negligible risks were observed for most EDCs under the worst-case scenario (RQ<sub>ex</sub> < 2.36 × 10⁻<sup>3</sup>). Noteworthy findings included the detection of previously undetected pharmaceuticals such as diphenhydramine on a global scale. Variability in the distribution of EDCs among river pollution classes exhibited statistically significant differences in their concentrations. The socioeconomic impact was evident, with gross domestic product (GDP) and population size positively influencing EDC concentrations, emphasizing the interconnected dynamics of urbanization, healthcare development, and pharmaceutical consumption. Additionally, the study identified negligible to low ecological risks associated with both individual and combined exposures to EDCs under general and worst-case scenarios. However, higher EDC risks were observed even in rivers classified as \"Clean\" or \"Moderately Polluted\", highlighting the need for more comprehensive monitoring strategies that account for emerging contaminants.</p>","PeriodicalId":11759,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","volume":"47 10","pages":"444"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Geochemistry and Health","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s10653-025-02760-x","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, ENVIRONMENTAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The contamination of endocrine disrupting compounds (EDCs) stands as an emerging environmental concern, leading to subsequent environmental and human exposure. A comprehensive analysis identified a total of 18 EDCs, including pharmaceuticals, hormones, and plasticizers, in Malaysian rivers classified into distinct pollution classes: "Clean", "Moderately Polluted", and "Polluted". The highest concentration of EDCs was observed in the "Moderately Polluted" Kim Kim River, notably containing 16.25 µg/L of caffeine. Caffeine exhibited ubiquitous presence across all pollution classes, with the Klang River ("Polluted") showing the peak concentration at 13.62 µg/L. In contrast, the "Clean" Kuantan River displayed the highest EDC concentration at 1.28 µg/L of bisphenol A. All individual EDCs posed negligible ecological risks, with RQ values below 0.01 (RQm < 8.70 × 10⁻3). Similarly, negligible risks were observed for most EDCs under the worst-case scenario (RQex < 2.36 × 10⁻3). Noteworthy findings included the detection of previously undetected pharmaceuticals such as diphenhydramine on a global scale. Variability in the distribution of EDCs among river pollution classes exhibited statistically significant differences in their concentrations. The socioeconomic impact was evident, with gross domestic product (GDP) and population size positively influencing EDC concentrations, emphasizing the interconnected dynamics of urbanization, healthcare development, and pharmaceutical consumption. Additionally, the study identified negligible to low ecological risks associated with both individual and combined exposures to EDCs under general and worst-case scenarios. However, higher EDC risks were observed even in rivers classified as "Clean" or "Moderately Polluted", highlighting the need for more comprehensive monitoring strategies that account for emerging contaminants.

解开内分泌干扰化合物、河流污染等级和社会经济因素之间的联系。
内分泌干扰化合物(EDCs)的污染是一个新兴的环境问题,导致随后的环境和人类暴露。一项综合分析确定了马来西亚河流中总共18种EDCs,包括药物、激素和增塑剂,它们被划分为不同的污染等级:“清洁”、“中度污染”和“污染”。EDCs浓度最高的是中度污染的金金江,咖啡因含量为16.25µg/L。咖啡因在所有污染类别中都无处不在,巴生河(“污染”)的峰值浓度为13.62微克/升。相比之下,“干净”的关丹河中EDC浓度最高,为1.28µg/L双酚a,所有个体EDC的生态风险都可以忽略不计,RQ值低于0.01 (rqm3)。同样,在最坏情况下,大多数EDCs的风险可以忽略不计(RQex 3)。值得注意的发现包括在全球范围内检测到以前未检测到的药物,如苯海拉明。EDCs在河流污染等级间的分布变异性在浓度上表现出显著的统计学差异。社会经济影响是明显的,国内生产总值(GDP)和人口规模对EDC浓度有积极影响,强调了城市化、医疗保健发展和药品消费之间相互关联的动态。此外,该研究还发现,在一般和最坏的情况下,个人和集体暴露于EDCs所带来的生态风险可以忽略不计。然而,即使在被列为“清洁”或“中度污染”的河流中,也观察到较高的EDC风险,这突出表明需要更全面的监测策略来考虑新出现的污染物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Environmental Geochemistry and Health
Environmental Geochemistry and Health 环境科学-工程:环境
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
4.80%
发文量
279
审稿时长
4.2 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Geochemistry and Health publishes original research papers and review papers across the broad field of environmental geochemistry. Environmental geochemistry and health establishes and explains links between the natural or disturbed chemical composition of the earth’s surface and the health of plants, animals and people. Beneficial elements regulate or promote enzymatic and hormonal activity whereas other elements may be toxic. Bedrock geochemistry controls the composition of soil and hence that of water and vegetation. Environmental issues, such as pollution, arising from the extraction and use of mineral resources, are discussed. The effects of contaminants introduced into the earth’s geochemical systems are examined. Geochemical surveys of soil, water and plants show how major and trace elements are distributed geographically. Associated epidemiological studies reveal the possibility of causal links between the natural or disturbed geochemical environment and disease. Experimental research illuminates the nature or consequences of natural or disturbed geochemical processes. The journal particularly welcomes novel research linking environmental geochemistry and health issues on such topics as: heavy metals (including mercury), persistent organic pollutants (POPs), and mixed chemicals emitted through human activities, such as uncontrolled recycling of electronic-waste; waste recycling; surface-atmospheric interaction processes (natural and anthropogenic emissions, vertical transport, deposition, and physical-chemical interaction) of gases and aerosols; phytoremediation/restoration of contaminated sites; food contamination and safety; environmental effects of medicines; effects and toxicity of mixed pollutants; speciation of heavy metals/metalloids; effects of mining; disturbed geochemistry from human behavior, natural or man-made hazards; particle and nanoparticle toxicology; risk and the vulnerability of populations, etc.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信