Optimal Stent Expansion Indices for Predicting Outcomes in PCI of Calcified Coronary Lesions.

IF 3.7 2区 医学 Q1 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS
Eleni Ntantou, Alexandros A Siskos, William Camilleri, Martin Roos, Quinten Wolff, Thomas Kok, Isabella Kardys, Joost Daemen, Roberto Diletti, Jeroen M Wilschut, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Wijnand K den Dekker
{"title":"Optimal Stent Expansion Indices for Predicting Outcomes in PCI of Calcified Coronary Lesions.","authors":"Eleni Ntantou, Alexandros A Siskos, William Camilleri, Martin Roos, Quinten Wolff, Thomas Kok, Isabella Kardys, Joost Daemen, Roberto Diletti, Jeroen M Wilschut, Rutger-Jan Nuis, Nicolas M Van Mieghem, Wijnand K den Dekker","doi":"10.1007/s00392-025-02753-x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>There is a lack of established stent expansion criteria to predict long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in calcified coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Aims: </strong>The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between various stent expansion indices and clinical outcomes including target lesion failure (TLF) following PCI in patients with calcified coronary lesions.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This study was a retrospective single-center study. Patients with native calcified coronary artery lesions treated with imaging guided PCI and the availability of final intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography images were included. The association between eight stent expansion indices and long-term TLF was evaluated.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 280 lesions from 221 patients were analyzed. The median patient age was 71 years (Interquartile Range: 63-77), and 155 (70.1%) were male. Of the eight stent expansion indices, only the minimum stent area (MSA) > 100% of distal reference lumen area (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.65; p = 0.003), MSA > 90% of distal reference area (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.84; p = 0.012) and MSA > 5.0 mm<sup>2</sup> or > 90% of distal reference lumen area criteria (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.75; p = 0.004) demonstrated a significant association with lower risk of long-term TLF.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>In the present retrospective analysis, a final MSA > 100% relative to the distal reference lumen area and MSA > 5.0 mm<sup>2</sup> or > 90% of distal reference lumen area criteria were most accurate in predicting TLF after PCI of calcified coronary lesions.</p>","PeriodicalId":10474,"journal":{"name":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical Research in Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1007/s00392-025-02753-x","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: There is a lack of established stent expansion criteria to predict long-term outcomes following percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in calcified coronary lesions.

Aims: The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between various stent expansion indices and clinical outcomes including target lesion failure (TLF) following PCI in patients with calcified coronary lesions.

Methods: This study was a retrospective single-center study. Patients with native calcified coronary artery lesions treated with imaging guided PCI and the availability of final intravascular ultrasound or optical coherence tomography images were included. The association between eight stent expansion indices and long-term TLF was evaluated.

Results: A total of 280 lesions from 221 patients were analyzed. The median patient age was 71 years (Interquartile Range: 63-77), and 155 (70.1%) were male. Of the eight stent expansion indices, only the minimum stent area (MSA) > 100% of distal reference lumen area (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.65; p = 0.003), MSA > 90% of distal reference area (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.84; p = 0.012) and MSA > 5.0 mm2 or > 90% of distal reference lumen area criteria (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.75; p = 0.004) demonstrated a significant association with lower risk of long-term TLF.

Conclusions: In the present retrospective analysis, a final MSA > 100% relative to the distal reference lumen area and MSA > 5.0 mm2 or > 90% of distal reference lumen area criteria were most accurate in predicting TLF after PCI of calcified coronary lesions.

预测钙化冠状动脉病变PCI预后的最佳支架扩张指标。
背景:目前缺乏成熟的支架扩张标准来预测钙化冠状动脉病变经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)后的长期预后。目的:本研究的目的是评估钙化冠状动脉病变患者PCI术后各种支架扩张指标与靶病变失败(TLF)等临床结果的关系。方法:本研究为回顾性单中心研究。接受影像学引导的PCI治疗的原生钙化冠状动脉病变患者,以及最终血管内超声或光学相干断层扫描图像的可用性。评估8项支架扩张指标与长期TLF的关系。结果:共分析了221例患者的280个病变。患者年龄中位数为71岁(四分位数范围:63-77岁),155例(70.1%)为男性。在8项支架扩张指标中,只有最小支架面积(MSA)为远端参考管腔面积的> 100% (HR 0.29; 95% CI 0.13-0.65; p = 0.003)、MSA >为远端参考管腔面积的90% (HR 0.45; 95% CI 0.25-0.84; p = 0.012)和MSA >为远端参考管腔面积的5.0 mm2或> 90% (HR 0.41; 95% CI 0.22-0.75; p = 0.004)与较低的长期TLF风险显著相关。结论:在本回顾性分析中,相对于远端参考管腔面积的最终MSA >00 %和远端参考管腔面积标准的MSA > 5.0 mm2或> 90%是预测钙化冠状动脉病变PCI后TLF最准确的指标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Clinical Research in Cardiology
Clinical Research in Cardiology 医学-心血管系统
CiteScore
11.40
自引率
4.00%
发文量
140
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Clinical Research in Cardiology is an international journal for clinical cardiovascular research. It provides a forum for original and review articles as well as critical perspective articles. Articles are only accepted if they meet stringent scientific standards and have undergone peer review. The journal regularly receives articles from the field of clinical cardiology, angiology, as well as heart and vascular surgery. As the official journal of the German Cardiac Society, it gives a current and competent survey on the diagnosis and therapy of heart and vascular diseases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信