Joint line elevation after TKA is higher in patients with metaphyseal deformity: a prospective study

IF 2.1 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Süleyman Albayrak, İsmail Demirkale, Mehmet Özer, Alparslan Kiliç, Hakan Şeşen, Murat Altay
{"title":"Joint line elevation after TKA is higher in patients with metaphyseal deformity: a prospective study","authors":"Süleyman Albayrak,&nbsp;İsmail Demirkale,&nbsp;Mehmet Özer,&nbsp;Alparslan Kiliç,&nbsp;Hakan Şeşen,&nbsp;Murat Altay","doi":"10.1007/s00402-025-06054-w","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><p>Joint level restoration is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate joint line estimation methods between two patient groups with mild to moderate or advanced varus deformities.</p><h3>Material and Methods</h3><p>Patients were classified according to the Parvizi Classification as Type IA or Type M. Measurements were taken of distances from the fibular head, medial and lateral epicondyles, and adductor tubercle to the joint line, and the adductor ratio (AR) was calculated. Joint line elevation was measured postoperatively. Two years after surgery, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were recorded at the end of 2 years postoperatively.</p><h3>Results</h3><p>Evaluation was made of 68 patients, comprising 58 (85.3%) females and 10 (14.7%) males with a median age of 65 years (IQR: 25–75; 62–69). Although preoperative AR values were significantly lower in the Type M group (p &lt; 0.001), no significant intraoperative AR difference was found (p = 0.829). The medial epicondyle to joint line and lateral epicondyle to joint line distances showed consistency between measurements in all groups. Joint elevation was significantly higher in the Type M group (3.5 mm (IQR 3.1–3.8) than the Type IA group (2.1 mm (IQR 1.6–2.6) (p &lt; 0.001). Preoperative and postoperative HSS were found to be similar in both groups (p = 0.995 and p = 0.374, respectively).</p><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>While Type IA gonarthrosis did not significantly affect joint line estimation and the Adductor Ratio (AR) showed inconsistency in Type M gonarthrosis, a key finding was the significantly higher joint line elevation observed in Type M compared to Type IA patients. Importantly, this increased elevation did not result in a significant impact on HSS functional scores at two years post-surgery.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":8326,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","volume":"145 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00402-025-06054-w","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction

Joint level restoration is crucial for the success of total knee arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to evaluate joint line estimation methods between two patient groups with mild to moderate or advanced varus deformities.

Material and Methods

Patients were classified according to the Parvizi Classification as Type IA or Type M. Measurements were taken of distances from the fibular head, medial and lateral epicondyles, and adductor tubercle to the joint line, and the adductor ratio (AR) was calculated. Joint line elevation was measured postoperatively. Two years after surgery, the Hospital for Special Surgery (HSS) scores were recorded at the end of 2 years postoperatively.

Results

Evaluation was made of 68 patients, comprising 58 (85.3%) females and 10 (14.7%) males with a median age of 65 years (IQR: 25–75; 62–69). Although preoperative AR values were significantly lower in the Type M group (p < 0.001), no significant intraoperative AR difference was found (p = 0.829). The medial epicondyle to joint line and lateral epicondyle to joint line distances showed consistency between measurements in all groups. Joint elevation was significantly higher in the Type M group (3.5 mm (IQR 3.1–3.8) than the Type IA group (2.1 mm (IQR 1.6–2.6) (p < 0.001). Preoperative and postoperative HSS were found to be similar in both groups (p = 0.995 and p = 0.374, respectively).

Conclusions

While Type IA gonarthrosis did not significantly affect joint line estimation and the Adductor Ratio (AR) showed inconsistency in Type M gonarthrosis, a key finding was the significantly higher joint line elevation observed in Type M compared to Type IA patients. Importantly, this increased elevation did not result in a significant impact on HSS functional scores at two years post-surgery.

干骺端畸形患者经TKA后关节线升高更高:一项前瞻性研究
关节水平恢复是全膝关节置换术成功的关键。本研究的目的是评估两组轻度至中度或晚期内翻畸形患者的关节线估计方法。材料与方法根据Parvizi分类法将患者分为IA型和m型。测量腓骨头、内上髁和外上髁、内收肌结节到关节线的距离,计算内收肌比(AR)。术后测量关节线高度。术后2年,记录两组患者术后2年的特殊外科医院(HSS)评分。结果共纳入68例患者,其中女性58例(85.3%),男性10例(14.7%),中位年龄65岁(IQR: 25 ~ 75; 62 ~ 69)。M型组术前AR值明显降低(p < 0.001),术中AR值差异无统计学意义(p = 0.829)。内上髁到关节线的距离和外上髁到关节线的距离在所有组之间的测量结果显示一致。M型组关节抬高(3.5 mm (IQR 3.1-3.8))明显高于IA型组(2.1 mm (IQR 1.6-2.6)) (p < 0.001)。两组患者术前、术后HSS差异无统计学意义(p = 0.995、p = 0.374)。结论:虽然IA型关节对关节线的估计没有显著影响,M型关节的内收比(AR)也不一致,但一个关键的发现是,M型关节的关节线抬高明显高于IA型。重要的是,这种升高并没有导致术后两年HSS功能评分的显著影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
13.00%
发文量
424
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is a rich source of instruction and information for physicians in clinical practice and research in the extensive field of orthopaedics and traumatology. The journal publishes papers that deal with diseases and injuries of the musculoskeletal system from all fields and aspects of medicine. The journal is particularly interested in papers that satisfy the information needs of orthopaedic clinicians and practitioners. The journal places special emphasis on clinical relevance. "Archives of Orthopaedic and Trauma Surgery" is the official journal of the German Speaking Arthroscopy Association (AGA).
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信