Evaluating the absolute accuracy of UAV RTK photogrammetry and LiDAR for 3D cultural heritage documentation: a comparative study of DJI zenmuse P1 and L1 systems
Lovre Panđa, Ante Šiljeg, Fran Domazetović, Ivan Marić, Mladen Jurišić, Dorijan Radočaj, Rina Milošević
{"title":"Evaluating the absolute accuracy of UAV RTK photogrammetry and LiDAR for 3D cultural heritage documentation: a comparative study of DJI zenmuse P1 and L1 systems","authors":"Lovre Panđa, Ante Šiljeg, Fran Domazetović, Ivan Marić, Mladen Jurišić, Dorijan Radočaj, Rina Milošević","doi":"10.1007/s12518-025-00642-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cultural heritage faces numerous threats, ranging from armed conflicts to the impacts of climate change. The need for robust documentation methods to safeguard and preserve cultural assets has become increasingly apparent. In this context, 3D documentation has emerged as a pivotal tool, providing a comprehensive means to capture and analyze cultural heritage in intricate detail. Various technologies contribute to 3D documentation, each with unique advantages and limitations. As technology evolves, the accessibility of high-precision methods, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), has expanded. The main aim of this paper is to assess the absolute accuracy of the post-processing kinematic (RTK/PPK) approach of the UAV RTK LiDAR system (Matrice M300 RTK + DJI Zenmuse L1 LiDAR) with UAV RTK aerophotogrammetry (Matrice M300 RTK + Zenmuse L1 RGB and DJI Zenmuse P1 camera). Also, the comparison of reconstructed dense clouds is done using C2C and M3C2 within CloudCompare software as well as roughness analysis using the Compute geometric feature tool. The research indicates that aerial photogrammetry using the P1 camera has the highest absolute RTK/PPK approach accuracy. However, L1 RGB is accurate enough for 3D cultural heritage documentation application. Furthermore, the cloud-to-cloud comparison has demonstrated that the L1 RGB camera is more accurate (~ 5 cm) than the L1 LiDAR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46286,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geomatics","volume":"17 4","pages":"711 - 731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-025-00642-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Cultural heritage faces numerous threats, ranging from armed conflicts to the impacts of climate change. The need for robust documentation methods to safeguard and preserve cultural assets has become increasingly apparent. In this context, 3D documentation has emerged as a pivotal tool, providing a comprehensive means to capture and analyze cultural heritage in intricate detail. Various technologies contribute to 3D documentation, each with unique advantages and limitations. As technology evolves, the accessibility of high-precision methods, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), has expanded. The main aim of this paper is to assess the absolute accuracy of the post-processing kinematic (RTK/PPK) approach of the UAV RTK LiDAR system (Matrice M300 RTK + DJI Zenmuse L1 LiDAR) with UAV RTK aerophotogrammetry (Matrice M300 RTK + Zenmuse L1 RGB and DJI Zenmuse P1 camera). Also, the comparison of reconstructed dense clouds is done using C2C and M3C2 within CloudCompare software as well as roughness analysis using the Compute geometric feature tool. The research indicates that aerial photogrammetry using the P1 camera has the highest absolute RTK/PPK approach accuracy. However, L1 RGB is accurate enough for 3D cultural heritage documentation application. Furthermore, the cloud-to-cloud comparison has demonstrated that the L1 RGB camera is more accurate (~ 5 cm) than the L1 LiDAR.
期刊介绍:
Applied Geomatics (AGMJ) is the official journal of SIFET the Italian Society of Photogrammetry and Topography and covers all aspects and information on scientific and technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The Journal publishes innovative contributions in geomatics applications ranging from the integration of instruments, methodologies and technologies and their use in the environmental sciences, engineering and other natural sciences.
The areas of interest include many research fields such as: remote sensing, close range and videometric photogrammetry, image analysis, digital mapping, land and geographic information systems, geographic information science, integrated geodesy, spatial data analysis, heritage recording; network adjustment and numerical processes. Furthermore, Applied Geomatics is open to articles from all areas of deformation measurements and analysis, structural engineering, mechanical engineering and all trends in earth and planetary survey science and space technology. The Journal also contains notices of conferences and international workshops, industry news, and information on new products. It provides a useful forum for professional and academic scientists involved in geomatics science and technology.
Information on Open Research Funding and Support may be found here: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements