Evaluating the absolute accuracy of UAV RTK photogrammetry and LiDAR for 3D cultural heritage documentation: a comparative study of DJI zenmuse P1 and L1 systems

IF 2.3 Q2 REMOTE SENSING
Lovre Panđa, Ante Šiljeg, Fran Domazetović, Ivan Marić, Mladen Jurišić, Dorijan Radočaj, Rina Milošević
{"title":"Evaluating the absolute accuracy of UAV RTK photogrammetry and LiDAR for 3D cultural heritage documentation: a comparative study of DJI zenmuse P1 and L1 systems","authors":"Lovre Panđa,&nbsp;Ante Šiljeg,&nbsp;Fran Domazetović,&nbsp;Ivan Marić,&nbsp;Mladen Jurišić,&nbsp;Dorijan Radočaj,&nbsp;Rina Milošević","doi":"10.1007/s12518-025-00642-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Cultural heritage faces numerous threats, ranging from armed conflicts to the impacts of climate change. The need for robust documentation methods to safeguard and preserve cultural assets has become increasingly apparent. In this context, 3D documentation has emerged as a pivotal tool, providing a comprehensive means to capture and analyze cultural heritage in intricate detail. Various technologies contribute to 3D documentation, each with unique advantages and limitations. As technology evolves, the accessibility of high-precision methods, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), has expanded. The main aim of this paper is to assess the absolute accuracy of the post-processing kinematic (RTK/PPK) approach of the UAV RTK LiDAR system (Matrice M300 RTK + DJI Zenmuse L1 LiDAR) with UAV RTK aerophotogrammetry (Matrice M300 RTK + Zenmuse L1 RGB and DJI Zenmuse P1 camera). Also, the comparison of reconstructed dense clouds is done using C2C and M3C2 within CloudCompare software as well as roughness analysis using the Compute geometric feature tool. The research indicates that aerial photogrammetry using the P1 camera has the highest absolute RTK/PPK approach accuracy. However, L1 RGB is accurate enough for 3D cultural heritage documentation application. Furthermore, the cloud-to-cloud comparison has demonstrated that the L1 RGB camera is more accurate (~ 5 cm) than the L1 LiDAR.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46286,"journal":{"name":"Applied Geomatics","volume":"17 4","pages":"711 - 731"},"PeriodicalIF":2.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Applied Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12518-025-00642-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cultural heritage faces numerous threats, ranging from armed conflicts to the impacts of climate change. The need for robust documentation methods to safeguard and preserve cultural assets has become increasingly apparent. In this context, 3D documentation has emerged as a pivotal tool, providing a comprehensive means to capture and analyze cultural heritage in intricate detail. Various technologies contribute to 3D documentation, each with unique advantages and limitations. As technology evolves, the accessibility of high-precision methods, such as Light Detection and Ranging (LiDAR), has expanded. The main aim of this paper is to assess the absolute accuracy of the post-processing kinematic (RTK/PPK) approach of the UAV RTK LiDAR system (Matrice M300 RTK + DJI Zenmuse L1 LiDAR) with UAV RTK aerophotogrammetry (Matrice M300 RTK + Zenmuse L1 RGB and DJI Zenmuse P1 camera). Also, the comparison of reconstructed dense clouds is done using C2C and M3C2 within CloudCompare software as well as roughness analysis using the Compute geometric feature tool. The research indicates that aerial photogrammetry using the P1 camera has the highest absolute RTK/PPK approach accuracy. However, L1 RGB is accurate enough for 3D cultural heritage documentation application. Furthermore, the cloud-to-cloud comparison has demonstrated that the L1 RGB camera is more accurate (~ 5 cm) than the L1 LiDAR.

评估无人机RTK摄影测量和激光雷达用于三维文化遗产记录的绝对精度:大疆zenmuse P1和L1系统的比较研究
文化遗产面临着从武装冲突到气候变化影响等诸多威胁。越来越明显的是,需要强有力的文献方法来保护和保存文化资产。在这种背景下,3D文档作为一种关键工具出现,它提供了一种全面的手段来捕捉和分析文化遗产的复杂细节。各种技术有助于3D文档,每种技术都有其独特的优点和局限性。随着技术的发展,高精度方法,如光探测和测距(激光雷达)的可及性已经扩大。本文的主要目的是评估无人机RTK激光雷达系统(matrix M300 RTK + DJI Zenmuse L1激光雷达)与无人机RTK航空摄影测量(matrix M300 RTK + Zenmuse L1 RGB和DJI Zenmuse P1相机)的后处理运动学(RTK/PPK)方法的绝对精度。此外,在CloudCompare软件中使用C2C和M3C2对重建的稠密云进行了比较,并使用Compute几何特征工具进行了粗糙度分析。研究表明,使用P1相机的航空摄影测量具有最高的绝对RTK/PPK接近精度。然而,L1 RGB对于3D文化遗产文档的应用已经足够精确。此外,云对云的比较表明,L1 RGB相机比L1激光雷达更精确(约5厘米)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Applied Geomatics
Applied Geomatics REMOTE SENSING-
CiteScore
5.40
自引率
3.70%
发文量
61
期刊介绍: Applied Geomatics (AGMJ) is the official journal of SIFET the Italian Society of Photogrammetry and Topography and covers all aspects and information on scientific and technical advances in the geomatics sciences. The Journal publishes innovative contributions in geomatics applications ranging from the integration of instruments, methodologies and technologies and their use in the environmental sciences, engineering and other natural sciences. The areas of interest include many research fields such as: remote sensing, close range and videometric photogrammetry, image analysis, digital mapping, land and geographic information systems, geographic information science, integrated geodesy, spatial data analysis, heritage recording; network adjustment and numerical processes. Furthermore, Applied Geomatics is open to articles from all areas of deformation measurements and analysis, structural engineering, mechanical engineering and all trends in earth and planetary survey science and space technology. The Journal also contains notices of conferences and international workshops, industry news, and information on new products. It provides a useful forum for professional and academic scientists involved in geomatics science and technology. Information on Open Research Funding and Support may be found here: https://www.springernature.com/gp/open-research/institutional-agreements
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信