Adaptation Strategies of Small‐Scale Marine Fisheries in Response to Climate Change, Resource Changes, and Sudden Systemic Shocks

Bindi V. Shah, Bethan C. O'Leary, K. Rejula, Paul Kemp, K. M. Sandhya, V. R. Madhu, Nikita Gopal
{"title":"Adaptation Strategies of Small‐Scale Marine Fisheries in Response to Climate Change, Resource Changes, and Sudden Systemic Shocks","authors":"Bindi V. Shah, Bethan C. O'Leary, K. Rejula, Paul Kemp, K. M. Sandhya, V. R. Madhu, Nikita Gopal","doi":"10.1002/wcc.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Biodiversity loss and climate change threaten global food security and the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Fish is considered important for combating malnutrition globally and small‐scale fisheries are vital to the marine wild capture industry, supporting livelihoods and well‐being. With many marine small‐scale fishing communities experiencing the effects of climatic and resource changes on subsistence, income, and well‐being, it is important to understand what adaptation strategies might help these communities thrive. Through a review of scientific literature, we identified short‐term coping and long‐term adaptive strategies employed around the world to reduce local vulnerability and improve resilience to climate change, resource changes, and sudden systemic shocks such as COVID‐19. However, most reported strategies examined only fishers (82.6%) rather than those involved in fish processing. Coping strategies to minimize vulnerability dominated documented responses (67.7%) rather than longer‐term adaptive strategies. Fishers initiated most coping strategies themselves (88.9%); adaptive strategies were more likely to rely on external actors (53.8%). Findings underscored the relative importance of two social factors that influenced whether specific strategies were adopted or not: social organization (formal and informal social networks between individuals, communities, and institutions) and assets (financial, technological, informational, and natural capital). We argue that mobilization of these networks and resources requires agency, which is shaped by inequalities within communities. Given the intensifying effects of climate change and potential for societal shocks, we urge researchers and practitioners to support communities through locally relevant longer‐term adaptation strategies that address the full fishery from catch to processing chains.This article is categorized under: <jats:list list-type=\"simple\"> <jats:list-item>Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change &gt; Learning from Cases and Analogies</jats:list-item> <jats:list-item>Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change &gt; Institutions for Adaptation</jats:list-item> </jats:list>","PeriodicalId":501019,"journal":{"name":"WIREs Climate Change","volume":"15 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WIREs Climate Change","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/wcc.70019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Biodiversity loss and climate change threaten global food security and the achievement of the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals. Fish is considered important for combating malnutrition globally and small‐scale fisheries are vital to the marine wild capture industry, supporting livelihoods and well‐being. With many marine small‐scale fishing communities experiencing the effects of climatic and resource changes on subsistence, income, and well‐being, it is important to understand what adaptation strategies might help these communities thrive. Through a review of scientific literature, we identified short‐term coping and long‐term adaptive strategies employed around the world to reduce local vulnerability and improve resilience to climate change, resource changes, and sudden systemic shocks such as COVID‐19. However, most reported strategies examined only fishers (82.6%) rather than those involved in fish processing. Coping strategies to minimize vulnerability dominated documented responses (67.7%) rather than longer‐term adaptive strategies. Fishers initiated most coping strategies themselves (88.9%); adaptive strategies were more likely to rely on external actors (53.8%). Findings underscored the relative importance of two social factors that influenced whether specific strategies were adopted or not: social organization (formal and informal social networks between individuals, communities, and institutions) and assets (financial, technological, informational, and natural capital). We argue that mobilization of these networks and resources requires agency, which is shaped by inequalities within communities. Given the intensifying effects of climate change and potential for societal shocks, we urge researchers and practitioners to support communities through locally relevant longer‐term adaptation strategies that address the full fishery from catch to processing chains.This article is categorized under: Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Learning from Cases and Analogies Vulnerability and Adaptation to Climate Change > Institutions for Adaptation
小型海洋渔业对气候变化、资源变化和突发性系统冲击的适应策略
生物多样性丧失和气候变化威胁着全球粮食安全和联合国可持续发展目标的实现。鱼类被认为是对抗全球营养不良的重要因素,小规模渔业对海洋野生捕捞业至关重要,支持生计和福祉。由于许多海洋小规模渔业社区正在经历气候和资源变化对生计、收入和福祉的影响,因此了解哪些适应策略可以帮助这些社区蓬勃发展非常重要。通过对科学文献的回顾,我们确定了世界各地采用的短期应对和长期适应策略,以降低当地的脆弱性,提高对气候变化、资源变化和突发性系统性冲击(如COVID - 19)的抵御能力。然而,大多数报告的策略只检查了渔民(82.6%),而不是涉及鱼类加工的人。减少脆弱性的应对策略占主导地位(67.7%),而不是长期的适应性策略。渔民自己采取的应对策略最多(88.9%);适应性策略更倾向于依赖外部行为者(53.8%)。研究结果强调了影响具体战略是否被采用的两个社会因素的相对重要性:社会组织(个人、社区和机构之间的正式和非正式社会网络)和资产(金融、技术、信息和自然资本)。我们认为,这些网络和资源的动员需要机构,这是由社区内的不平等形成的。鉴于气候变化的影响日益加剧以及潜在的社会冲击,我们敦促研究人员和从业者通过与当地相关的长期适应战略来支持社区,解决从捕捞到加工链的整个渔业问题。本文分类如下:气候变化脆弱性与适应>;从案例和类比中学习;气候变化脆弱性与适应>;适应机制
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信