Jimeng Feng, Junfu Fu, Jiadai Song, Junru Zhang, Longyan Duan, Bo Wang, Zhiqiang Sun
{"title":"Control Mechanism of Large Deformation in Soft Rock Tunnel Based on Polyurethane Foam Buffer Layer","authors":"Jimeng Feng, Junfu Fu, Jiadai Song, Junru Zhang, Longyan Duan, Bo Wang, Zhiqiang Sun","doi":"10.1002/nag.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large deformations of the surrounding rock often occur in tunnels excavated in soft rocks with high geostress, which can lead to the destruction of the lining structure. Therefore, the adoption of an appropriate support structure to control soft rock deformation is particularly important to ensure the safety of the tunnel in the preconstruction and post‐operation. In this paper, a yielding support system containing polyurethane (PU) foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer is proposed, and based on the yielding support mechanism, combined with numerical simulation and model experiments, the thickness of the energy‐absorbing buffer layer and the location of the arrangement are specifically studied. The findings indicate that the yielding layer, with a PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer, exhibits a substantial yielding phase compared to a rigid support structure. The strain‐dependent adjustment of the elastic modulus method can better simulate the stress characteristics of the yielding layer in numerical calculations than the case of a constant modulus of elasticity. In this study, the optimum thickness of the PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer was 20 cm, and the optimum location was between the initial support structure and the secondary lining structure. Scale model testing further corroborates these results, demonstrating that the rigid support system's secondary lining structure develops cracks at the arched roof and elevated arch locations under a 2.0‐MPa load. In contrast, the yielding support system absorbs energy from surrounding rock deformation through compression, maintaining stability even under an 8.0‐MPa load, thereby enhancing the overall performance of the support structure system. The scale model test analysis serves as additional validation for the numerical simulation results.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Large deformations of the surrounding rock often occur in tunnels excavated in soft rocks with high geostress, which can lead to the destruction of the lining structure. Therefore, the adoption of an appropriate support structure to control soft rock deformation is particularly important to ensure the safety of the tunnel in the preconstruction and post‐operation. In this paper, a yielding support system containing polyurethane (PU) foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer is proposed, and based on the yielding support mechanism, combined with numerical simulation and model experiments, the thickness of the energy‐absorbing buffer layer and the location of the arrangement are specifically studied. The findings indicate that the yielding layer, with a PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer, exhibits a substantial yielding phase compared to a rigid support structure. The strain‐dependent adjustment of the elastic modulus method can better simulate the stress characteristics of the yielding layer in numerical calculations than the case of a constant modulus of elasticity. In this study, the optimum thickness of the PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer was 20 cm, and the optimum location was between the initial support structure and the secondary lining structure. Scale model testing further corroborates these results, demonstrating that the rigid support system's secondary lining structure develops cracks at the arched roof and elevated arch locations under a 2.0‐MPa load. In contrast, the yielding support system absorbs energy from surrounding rock deformation through compression, maintaining stability even under an 8.0‐MPa load, thereby enhancing the overall performance of the support structure system. The scale model test analysis serves as additional validation for the numerical simulation results.
期刊介绍:
The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.