Control Mechanism of Large Deformation in Soft Rock Tunnel Based on Polyurethane Foam Buffer Layer

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jimeng Feng, Junfu Fu, Jiadai Song, Junru Zhang, Longyan Duan, Bo Wang, Zhiqiang Sun
{"title":"Control Mechanism of Large Deformation in Soft Rock Tunnel Based on Polyurethane Foam Buffer Layer","authors":"Jimeng Feng, Junfu Fu, Jiadai Song, Junru Zhang, Longyan Duan, Bo Wang, Zhiqiang Sun","doi":"10.1002/nag.70072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Large deformations of the surrounding rock often occur in tunnels excavated in soft rocks with high geostress, which can lead to the destruction of the lining structure. Therefore, the adoption of an appropriate support structure to control soft rock deformation is particularly important to ensure the safety of the tunnel in the preconstruction and post‐operation. In this paper, a yielding support system containing polyurethane (PU) foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer is proposed, and based on the yielding support mechanism, combined with numerical simulation and model experiments, the thickness of the energy‐absorbing buffer layer and the location of the arrangement are specifically studied. The findings indicate that the yielding layer, with a PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer, exhibits a substantial yielding phase compared to a rigid support structure. The strain‐dependent adjustment of the elastic modulus method can better simulate the stress characteristics of the yielding layer in numerical calculations than the case of a constant modulus of elasticity. In this study, the optimum thickness of the PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer was 20 cm, and the optimum location was between the initial support structure and the secondary lining structure. Scale model testing further corroborates these results, demonstrating that the rigid support system's secondary lining structure develops cracks at the arched roof and elevated arch locations under a 2.0‐MPa load. In contrast, the yielding support system absorbs energy from surrounding rock deformation through compression, maintaining stability even under an 8.0‐MPa load, thereby enhancing the overall performance of the support structure system. The scale model test analysis serves as additional validation for the numerical simulation results.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"36 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70072","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Large deformations of the surrounding rock often occur in tunnels excavated in soft rocks with high geostress, which can lead to the destruction of the lining structure. Therefore, the adoption of an appropriate support structure to control soft rock deformation is particularly important to ensure the safety of the tunnel in the preconstruction and post‐operation. In this paper, a yielding support system containing polyurethane (PU) foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer is proposed, and based on the yielding support mechanism, combined with numerical simulation and model experiments, the thickness of the energy‐absorbing buffer layer and the location of the arrangement are specifically studied. The findings indicate that the yielding layer, with a PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer, exhibits a substantial yielding phase compared to a rigid support structure. The strain‐dependent adjustment of the elastic modulus method can better simulate the stress characteristics of the yielding layer in numerical calculations than the case of a constant modulus of elasticity. In this study, the optimum thickness of the PU foam energy‐absorbing buffer layer was 20 cm, and the optimum location was between the initial support structure and the secondary lining structure. Scale model testing further corroborates these results, demonstrating that the rigid support system's secondary lining structure develops cracks at the arched roof and elevated arch locations under a 2.0‐MPa load. In contrast, the yielding support system absorbs energy from surrounding rock deformation through compression, maintaining stability even under an 8.0‐MPa load, thereby enhancing the overall performance of the support structure system. The scale model test analysis serves as additional validation for the numerical simulation results.
基于聚氨酯泡沫缓冲层的软岩隧道大变形控制机理
在高地应力软岩中开挖的隧道,常发生围岩大变形,导致衬砌结构破坏。因此,采用合适的支护结构控制软岩变形,对保证隧道施工前和施工后的安全尤为重要。本文提出了一种含聚氨酯泡沫吸能缓冲层的屈服支撑体系,并基于屈服支撑机理,结合数值模拟和模型实验,对吸能缓冲层的厚度和布置位置进行了具体研究。研究结果表明,与刚性支撑结构相比,具有PU泡沫吸能缓冲层的屈服层表现出实质性的屈服阶段。与弹性模量恒定的情况相比,应变相关的弹性模量调整法在数值计算中能更好地模拟屈服层的应力特征。在本研究中,PU泡沫吸能缓冲层的最佳厚度为20 cm,最佳位置在初始支撑结构和二次衬里结构之间。比例模型试验进一步证实了这些结果,表明在2.0 MPa荷载作用下,刚性支撑体系的二次衬砌结构在拱顶和高架拱位置出现裂缝。相反,屈服式支护系统通过压缩吸收围岩变形的能量,即使在8.0 MPa荷载下也能保持稳定,从而提高了支护结构系统的整体性能。比例模型试验分析为数值模拟结果提供了额外的验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信