Analytical Solutions for Evaluating the Efficacy of the Clay Shock Method in Shield Tunnels With Space Curves

IF 3.6 2区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL
Jiannan Xie, Pengfei Li, Zhaoguo Ge, Shuang Chen, Shaohua Li, Fei Jia
{"title":"Analytical Solutions for Evaluating the Efficacy of the Clay Shock Method in Shield Tunnels With Space Curves","authors":"Jiannan Xie, Pengfei Li, Zhaoguo Ge, Shuang Chen, Shaohua Li, Fei Jia","doi":"10.1002/nag.70076","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Clay Shock method has been widely applied in shield tunneling engineering, attributed to its strong adaptability and prominent characteristic of rapid solidification for stratum reinforcement. As a supplementary measure to conventional grouting and filling techniques, it can further compensate for stratum losses. However, the impact of employing Clay Shock on the stratum to which the tunnel belongs and its efficacy in stratum control remain elusive. This paper presents a theoretical analysis method for evaluating the efficacy of the Clay Shock method in shield tunnels with space curves. The analytical method includes two shield cross‐section models. By applying the elasticity general solution, a comprehensive analytical solution is derived in this study to quantify the variations in the ground displacement field and additional stress field induced by shield tunnel boring after implementing the Clay Shock method. After conducting an analysis of the relevant parameters in accordance with the specific project, the method is validated through numerical methods and field data. It was found that the relationship between the grouting method on the outside of the pipe sheet and the mechanical disturbance of the formation is more complex. It is inaccurate to use only the simple formation loss rate to represent the formation deformation in the unit case. We propose a corresponding grouting design for the above problems. This study not only elucidates the specific impacts of the Clay Shock method on soil behavior, but also establishes a comprehensive theoretical foundation for its application principle in shield tunnelling.","PeriodicalId":13786,"journal":{"name":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","volume":"171 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.70076","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The Clay Shock method has been widely applied in shield tunneling engineering, attributed to its strong adaptability and prominent characteristic of rapid solidification for stratum reinforcement. As a supplementary measure to conventional grouting and filling techniques, it can further compensate for stratum losses. However, the impact of employing Clay Shock on the stratum to which the tunnel belongs and its efficacy in stratum control remain elusive. This paper presents a theoretical analysis method for evaluating the efficacy of the Clay Shock method in shield tunnels with space curves. The analytical method includes two shield cross‐section models. By applying the elasticity general solution, a comprehensive analytical solution is derived in this study to quantify the variations in the ground displacement field and additional stress field induced by shield tunnel boring after implementing the Clay Shock method. After conducting an analysis of the relevant parameters in accordance with the specific project, the method is validated through numerical methods and field data. It was found that the relationship between the grouting method on the outside of the pipe sheet and the mechanical disturbance of the formation is more complex. It is inaccurate to use only the simple formation loss rate to represent the formation deformation in the unit case. We propose a corresponding grouting design for the above problems. This study not only elucidates the specific impacts of the Clay Shock method on soil behavior, but also establishes a comprehensive theoretical foundation for its application principle in shield tunnelling.
具有空间曲线的盾构隧道中粘土冲击法效果评价的解析解
粘土冲击法因其对地层加固适应性强、快速固化的突出特点,在盾构工程中得到了广泛的应用。作为常规注浆充填技术的补充措施,可进一步补偿地层损失。然而,利用粘土冲击对隧道所处地层的影响及其对地层的控制效果尚不明确。提出了一种评价空间曲线盾构隧道中粘土冲击法施工效果的理论分析方法。分析方法包括两种盾构截面模型。本文应用弹性通解,导出了一种综合解析解,量化了盾构隧道采用粘土冲击法开挖后引起的地面位移场和附加应力场的变化。根据具体工程对相关参数进行分析后,通过数值方法和现场数据对方法进行验证。研究发现,管板外侧注浆方式与地层力学扰动之间的关系更为复杂。仅用简单的地层损失率来表示单位情况下的地层变形是不准确的。针对上述问题提出相应的注浆设计方案。本研究不仅阐明了粘土冲击法对土体特性的具体影响,而且为其在盾构施工中的应用原理奠定了全面的理论基础。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
12.50%
发文量
160
审稿时长
9 months
期刊介绍: The journal welcomes manuscripts that substantially contribute to the understanding of the complex mechanical behaviour of geomaterials (soils, rocks, concrete, ice, snow, and powders), through innovative experimental techniques, and/or through the development of novel numerical or hybrid experimental/numerical modelling concepts in geomechanics. Topics of interest include instabilities and localization, interface and surface phenomena, fracture and failure, multi-physics and other time-dependent phenomena, micromechanics and multi-scale methods, and inverse analysis and stochastic methods. Papers related to energy and environmental issues are particularly welcome. The illustration of the proposed methods and techniques to engineering problems is encouraged. However, manuscripts dealing with applications of existing methods, or proposing incremental improvements to existing methods – in particular marginal extensions of existing analytical solutions or numerical methods – will not be considered for review.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信