A Case-Based Approach to Racial Health Disparities in Infertility Diagnosis and Management-From Reproductive Life Planning to Treating Infertility.

Micaela Stevenson Wyszewianski, Eliyah J Stevenson, Jayme Bosler
{"title":"A Case-Based Approach to Racial Health Disparities in Infertility Diagnosis and Management-From Reproductive Life Planning to Treating Infertility.","authors":"Micaela Stevenson Wyszewianski, Eliyah J Stevenson, Jayme Bosler","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Increasing attention has been paid to medical racial health disparities, though limited attention has been paid to mitigating these disparities in access to fertility care and reproductive life planning. Workshops previously have been shown to increase physician awareness and practice improvements.</p><p><strong>Objective: </strong>We sought to develop an education tool to provide structured, case-based learning for physicians to reflect on bias in fertility assessment and treatment and discuss changes in practice.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Authors created reproductive life planning and infertility management cases and arranged them for review informed by reproductive justice and fertility scholars. The resulting workshop was piloted to a group of 10 residents in person at a single academic institution. The cases were presented in a large group style and participants discussed cases in pairs. At the workshop's conclusion, participants were prompted to provide feedback via a survey.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>One hundred percent (10/10) of respondents reported that the workshop helped them think about bias in medicine. Ninety percent (9/10) of respondents reported that after the workshop, they will think differently about how they approach marginalized patients in their practice. Eighty percent (8/10) of participants reported that the workshop gave them tools on how to approach marginalized patients in their practice.</p><p><strong>Discussion/conclusions: </strong>Participants reported overwhelmingly that they found the workshop valuable and that it assisted them in making goals to change their practice to improve fertility care for racially marginalized patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"124 3","pages":"277-279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Increasing attention has been paid to medical racial health disparities, though limited attention has been paid to mitigating these disparities in access to fertility care and reproductive life planning. Workshops previously have been shown to increase physician awareness and practice improvements.

Objective: We sought to develop an education tool to provide structured, case-based learning for physicians to reflect on bias in fertility assessment and treatment and discuss changes in practice.

Methods: Authors created reproductive life planning and infertility management cases and arranged them for review informed by reproductive justice and fertility scholars. The resulting workshop was piloted to a group of 10 residents in person at a single academic institution. The cases were presented in a large group style and participants discussed cases in pairs. At the workshop's conclusion, participants were prompted to provide feedback via a survey.

Results: One hundred percent (10/10) of respondents reported that the workshop helped them think about bias in medicine. Ninety percent (9/10) of respondents reported that after the workshop, they will think differently about how they approach marginalized patients in their practice. Eighty percent (8/10) of participants reported that the workshop gave them tools on how to approach marginalized patients in their practice.

Discussion/conclusions: Participants reported overwhelmingly that they found the workshop valuable and that it assisted them in making goals to change their practice to improve fertility care for racially marginalized patients.

从生育生活计划到治疗不孕症的种族健康差异的个案分析。
背景:越来越多的人注意到医疗上的种族健康差异,尽管在获得生育护理和生殖生活计划方面对减轻这些差异的关注有限。以前的讲习班已经证明可以提高医生的认识并改进实践。目的:我们试图开发一种教育工具,为医生提供结构化的、基于案例的学习,以反思生育评估和治疗中的偏见,并讨论实践中的变化。方法:作者编制生殖生活规划和不孕不育管理案例,由生殖司法和生育学者进行审查。由此产生的讲习班在一个学术机构的10名居民中进行了试点。案例以大型小组的形式呈现,参与者两人一组讨论案例。在研讨会结束时,参与者被要求通过一项调查提供反馈。结果:100%(10/10)的受访者报告说,研讨会帮助他们思考医学上的偏见。90%(9/10)的受访者报告说,在研讨会之后,他们将以不同的方式思考他们在实践中如何对待边缘化患者。80%(8/10)的参与者报告说,讲习班为他们提供了如何在实践中接近边缘化患者的工具。讨论/结论:绝大多数与会者报告说,他们发现研讨会很有价值,它帮助他们制定目标,改变他们的做法,以改善对种族边缘化患者的生育护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信