A Novel Coach-Approach to Clinical Faculty Mentoring and the UW Department of Medicine Clinical Faculty Development Program.

James H Stein, James D Alstott, Chariti Gent, Christine Fabian Bell, Daniel R Marlin, Anthony Hernandez, Esther Schulman, Sharon Gehl, Lynn M Schnapp
{"title":"A Novel Coach-Approach to Clinical Faculty Mentoring and the UW Department of Medicine Clinical Faculty Development Program.","authors":"James H Stein, James D Alstott, Chariti Gent, Christine Fabian Bell, Daniel R Marlin, Anthony Hernandez, Esther Schulman, Sharon Gehl, Lynn M Schnapp","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>Clinical faculty at academic health centers may benefit from specific mentorship and proficiencies that are distinct from those on research tracks. We describe the creation, activities, and 1-year impact of a faculty development program that included novel professional coaching training (the Clinical Faculty Mentoring Program), which was supplemented by skills- and knowledge-building activities (the Clinical Faculty Development Series).</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The goals and components of the Clinical Faculty Mentoring Program and Clinical Faculty Development Series are described in detail. A mixed methods evaluation plan guided collection of confidential survey and interview data before and after the first year of these activities. We used paired t tests to identify statistically significant changes.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The 43 clinical mentors reported significant gains in job satisfaction, teaching attitudes, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence with coaching skills for mentorship (all <i>P</i> < 0.05). Of mentor respondents, 88% found the coach approach to mentoring program to be \"very\" or \"somewhat\" helpful. Coaching behavioral domains with the greatest evidence of improvement were supporting the mentee to integrate new awareness, insight, and learning into their worldview and behaviors (<i>P</i> = 0.0503) and managing time and focus of mentoring sessions (<i>P</i> = 0.022). All 37 mentees had at least 1 meeting with a mentor (100%). Over 9 months, 39 virtual Clinical Faculty Development Series sessions had an average participation of 38 participants (range 22-59). A majority of surveyed faculty (>55%) agreed or strongly agreed the sessions provided valuable opportunities for skills development with teaching, leadership, wellness, diversity, equity, inclusion, and promotion.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Among clinical mentors, our novel coach approach to clinical faculty mentoring and skill-building had favorable effects on job satisfaction, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence in coaching skills. Outcomes from the Clinical Faculty Development series supported the mentoring program outcomes. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine how this program will impact mentees.</p>","PeriodicalId":94268,"journal":{"name":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","volume":"124 3","pages":"249-257"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WMJ : official publication of the State Medical Society of Wisconsin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: Clinical faculty at academic health centers may benefit from specific mentorship and proficiencies that are distinct from those on research tracks. We describe the creation, activities, and 1-year impact of a faculty development program that included novel professional coaching training (the Clinical Faculty Mentoring Program), which was supplemented by skills- and knowledge-building activities (the Clinical Faculty Development Series).

Methods: The goals and components of the Clinical Faculty Mentoring Program and Clinical Faculty Development Series are described in detail. A mixed methods evaluation plan guided collection of confidential survey and interview data before and after the first year of these activities. We used paired t tests to identify statistically significant changes.

Results: The 43 clinical mentors reported significant gains in job satisfaction, teaching attitudes, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence with coaching skills for mentorship (all P < 0.05). Of mentor respondents, 88% found the coach approach to mentoring program to be "very" or "somewhat" helpful. Coaching behavioral domains with the greatest evidence of improvement were supporting the mentee to integrate new awareness, insight, and learning into their worldview and behaviors (P = 0.0503) and managing time and focus of mentoring sessions (P = 0.022). All 37 mentees had at least 1 meeting with a mentor (100%). Over 9 months, 39 virtual Clinical Faculty Development Series sessions had an average participation of 38 participants (range 22-59). A majority of surveyed faculty (>55%) agreed or strongly agreed the sessions provided valuable opportunities for skills development with teaching, leadership, wellness, diversity, equity, inclusion, and promotion.

Conclusions: Among clinical mentors, our novel coach approach to clinical faculty mentoring and skill-building had favorable effects on job satisfaction, knowledge of mentorship competencies, and confidence in coaching skills. Outcomes from the Clinical Faculty Development series supported the mentoring program outcomes. Longitudinal follow-up is needed to determine how this program will impact mentees.

一种新的教练方法来指导临床教师和西澳大学医学系临床教师发展计划。
简介:学术卫生中心的临床教师可能受益于与研究人员不同的特定指导和熟练程度。我们描述了一个教师发展计划的创建、活动和一年的影响,该计划包括新颖的专业教练培训(临床教师指导计划),并辅以技能和知识建设活动(临床教师发展系列)。方法:详细描述临床教师指导计划和临床教师发展系列的目标和组成部分。在这些活动的第一年前后,一个混合方法评估计划指导了机密调查和访谈数据的收集。我们使用配对t检验来确定统计上显著的变化。结果:43名临床导师在工作满意度、教学态度、师徒能力知识、对师徒指导技能的信心(均P = 0.0503)和管理师徒会议的时间和焦点(P = 0.022)方面均有显著提高。所有37名学员都至少与导师见过一次面(100%)。在9个月的时间里,39次虚拟临床教师发展系列会议平均有38名参与者(范围22-59)参加。大多数接受调查的教师(约55%)同意或强烈同意,这些课程为教学、领导力、健康、多样性、公平、包容和晋升方面的技能发展提供了宝贵的机会。结论:在临床导师中,我们的新教练方法对临床教师指导和技能建设有良好的影响,包括工作满意度、指导能力知识和对指导技能的信心。临床教师发展系列的结果支持指导计划的结果。需要进行纵向随访,以确定该计划将如何影响学员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信