Instability after total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of combined anteversion and patient-related clinical parameters.

IF 2.2 3区 医学 Q2 ORTHOPEDICS
Joseph Attas, Régis Bernard de Dompsure, Lolita Micicoi, Lillia Gharbi, Michael Lopez, Nicolas Bronsard, Jean-François Gonzalez, Grégoire Micicoi
{"title":"Instability after total hip arthroplasty: Analysis of combined anteversion and patient-related clinical parameters.","authors":"Joseph Attas, Régis Bernard de Dompsure, Lolita Micicoi, Lillia Gharbi, Michael Lopez, Nicolas Bronsard, Jean-François Gonzalez, Grégoire Micicoi","doi":"10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104428","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>While outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are generally excellent, prosthetic dislocation remains a multifactorial complication. This study hypothesized that differences in combined anteversion (CA) exist between patients with and without dislocation. The objectives were to (1) compare postoperative alignment parameters between dislocated and stable hips, (2) assess differences of alignement according to surgical approach, and (3) evaluate patient-related risk factors for dislocation.</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>In this retrospective case-control study, 37 dislocated hips were matched to 74 stable hips by sex, age, body mass index, and surgical approach. Postoperative CT scans measured acetabular anteversion, femoral anteversion, CA, and cup inclination. Alignment was assessed relative to Lewinnek's safe zone (acetabular anteversion 15 ° ± 10 °, inclination 40 ° ± 10 °) and Jolles' target zone for CA (50 ° ± 10 °).</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Mean CA did not differ between dislocated and stable hips (45.9 ° vs 48.5 °, Δ = 2.6 °, p = 0.35). Target CA was achieved in 51% of dislocated and 54% of stable hips (p = 0.80). Cup inclination, acetabular anteversion, and femoral anteversion also showed no significant differences. Achievement of Lewinnek's safe zone was similar between groups, except for acetabular inclination (67.6% in dislocated vs 83.8% in stable hips, p = 0.04). Surgical approach (direct anterior vs posterior) was not associated with alignment differences. In multivariate analysis, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR = 2.5, p = 0.04) and degenerative lumbar spine symptoms (OR = 3.2, p < 0.01) were independently associated with dislocation risk.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>CA did not differ between dislocated and stable hips, suggesting that implant orientation alone does not explain instability. Instead, acetabular inclination, high ASA score, and lumbar spine pathology emerged as significant risk factors, underscoring the multifactorial nature of dislocation after THA.</p><p><strong>Level of evidence: </strong>III; case-control study.</p>","PeriodicalId":54664,"journal":{"name":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","volume":" ","pages":"104428"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Orthopaedics & Traumatology-Surgery & Research","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.otsr.2025.104428","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: While outcomes after total hip arthroplasty (THA) are generally excellent, prosthetic dislocation remains a multifactorial complication. This study hypothesized that differences in combined anteversion (CA) exist between patients with and without dislocation. The objectives were to (1) compare postoperative alignment parameters between dislocated and stable hips, (2) assess differences of alignement according to surgical approach, and (3) evaluate patient-related risk factors for dislocation.

Materials and methods: In this retrospective case-control study, 37 dislocated hips were matched to 74 stable hips by sex, age, body mass index, and surgical approach. Postoperative CT scans measured acetabular anteversion, femoral anteversion, CA, and cup inclination. Alignment was assessed relative to Lewinnek's safe zone (acetabular anteversion 15 ° ± 10 °, inclination 40 ° ± 10 °) and Jolles' target zone for CA (50 ° ± 10 °).

Results: Mean CA did not differ between dislocated and stable hips (45.9 ° vs 48.5 °, Δ = 2.6 °, p = 0.35). Target CA was achieved in 51% of dislocated and 54% of stable hips (p = 0.80). Cup inclination, acetabular anteversion, and femoral anteversion also showed no significant differences. Achievement of Lewinnek's safe zone was similar between groups, except for acetabular inclination (67.6% in dislocated vs 83.8% in stable hips, p = 0.04). Surgical approach (direct anterior vs posterior) was not associated with alignment differences. In multivariate analysis, ASA (American Society of Anesthesiologists) score ≥3 (OR = 2.5, p = 0.04) and degenerative lumbar spine symptoms (OR = 3.2, p < 0.01) were independently associated with dislocation risk.

Conclusion: CA did not differ between dislocated and stable hips, suggesting that implant orientation alone does not explain instability. Instead, acetabular inclination, high ASA score, and lumbar spine pathology emerged as significant risk factors, underscoring the multifactorial nature of dislocation after THA.

Level of evidence: III; case-control study.

全髋关节置换术后不稳定:联合前倾和患者相关临床参数分析。
导言:虽然全髋关节置换术(THA)后的预后通常很好,但假体脱位仍然是一个多因素并发症。本研究假设合并前倾(CA)在脱位患者和非脱位患者之间存在差异。目的是(1)比较脱位髋关节和稳定髋关节的术后对齐参数,(2)评估不同手术入路的对齐差异,(3)评估脱位患者相关的危险因素。材料和方法:在这项回顾性病例对照研究中,根据性别、年龄、体重指数和手术入路,将37个脱位髋关节与74个稳定髋关节进行匹配。术后CT扫描测量髋臼前倾、股前倾、CA和髋臼杯倾斜度。相对Lewinnek安全区(髋臼前倾15°±10°,倾斜40°±10°)和Jolles CA目标区(50°±10°)评估对齐。结果:脱位髋和稳定髋的平均CA无差异(45.9°vs 48.5°,Δ = 2.6°,p = 0.35)。51%脱位髋和54%稳定髋达到了目标CA (p = 0.80)。杯子倾斜度、髋臼前倾、股前倾也无显著差异。Lewinnek安全区的实现在两组之间相似,除了髋臼倾斜(脱位组67.6% vs稳定组83.8%,p = 0.04)。手术入路(直接前路vs后路)与对齐差异无关。在多变量分析中,ASA评分≥3分(OR = 2.5, p = 0.04),腰椎退行性症状(OR = 3.2, p)。结论:髋脱位和髋稳定之间CA无差异,提示单靠植入物定位不能解释髋不稳定。相反,髋臼倾斜、高ASA评分和腰椎病理成为重要的危险因素,强调了THA后脱位的多因素性质。证据等级:III;病例对照研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
26.10%
发文量
329
审稿时长
12.5 weeks
期刊介绍: Orthopaedics & Traumatology: Surgery & Research (OTSR) publishes original scientific work in English related to all domains of orthopaedics. Original articles, Reviews, Technical notes and Concise follow-up of a former OTSR study are published in English in electronic form only and indexed in the main international databases.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信