Alternative Plasma Thawers for Austere Resuscitative Surgical Teams: Literature Review.

Q3 Medicine
Brendan S Filip, Zacharie R Frank, Francisco J Aguirre, Donald J Vallier
{"title":"Alternative Plasma Thawers for Austere Resuscitative Surgical Teams: Literature Review.","authors":"Brendan S Filip, Zacharie R Frank, Francisco J Aguirre, Donald J Vallier","doi":"10.55460/MBFX-FHHR","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Introduction: </strong>The purpose of this literature review is to identify optimal alternative fresh frozen plasma thawing devices for Austere Resuscitative and Surgical Care (ARSC) teams operating in far forward settings constrained by logistical and operational requirements.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The authors reviewed existing literature to identify optimal alternative plasma thawing devices and assessed power consumption, weight, durability, portability, post-thaw coagulation preservation, and thaw kinetics. Field-adapted plasma thawers and other commercially available plasma thawing systems were analyzed to determine their suitability to meet the needs of ARSC teams. Sixteen articles were included after evaluating methodological quality and strength of evidence.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The authors recommend that ARSC teams use whole blood, liquid plasma, and FDA-approved thawing devices whenever available. However, if these options are not feasible, alternative methods should be considered to meet mission requirements. Among the devices reviewed, the sous vide demonstrated potential for this application. They are lightweight, compact, versatile, and capable of creating target temperature-controlled circulating water baths, making them superior when compared to other identified field-adapted devices. Dry-based thawing systems, such as the ZipThaw®, may also offer advantages by conserving resources like water and electricity; however, further research is needed to validate its effectiveness in forward operating environments.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":"72-77"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/MBFX-FHHR","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction: The purpose of this literature review is to identify optimal alternative fresh frozen plasma thawing devices for Austere Resuscitative and Surgical Care (ARSC) teams operating in far forward settings constrained by logistical and operational requirements.

Methods: The authors reviewed existing literature to identify optimal alternative plasma thawing devices and assessed power consumption, weight, durability, portability, post-thaw coagulation preservation, and thaw kinetics. Field-adapted plasma thawers and other commercially available plasma thawing systems were analyzed to determine their suitability to meet the needs of ARSC teams. Sixteen articles were included after evaluating methodological quality and strength of evidence.

Conclusion: The authors recommend that ARSC teams use whole blood, liquid plasma, and FDA-approved thawing devices whenever available. However, if these options are not feasible, alternative methods should be considered to meet mission requirements. Among the devices reviewed, the sous vide demonstrated potential for this application. They are lightweight, compact, versatile, and capable of creating target temperature-controlled circulating water baths, making them superior when compared to other identified field-adapted devices. Dry-based thawing systems, such as the ZipThaw®, may also offer advantages by conserving resources like water and electricity; however, further research is needed to validate its effectiveness in forward operating environments.

严峻复苏外科团队的替代血浆解冻器:文献综述。
引言:本文献综述的目的是为在后勤和操作要求受限的偏远地区开展工作的严峻复苏和外科护理(ARSC)团队确定最佳的替代新鲜冷冻血浆解冻装置。方法:作者回顾了现有的文献,以确定最佳的替代等离子体解冻装置,并评估了功耗、重量、耐用性、便携性、解冻后凝血保存和解冻动力学。对现场等离子体解冻器和其他市售等离子体解冻系统进行了分析,以确定它们是否适合ARSC团队的需求。在评估了方法学质量和证据强度后,纳入了16篇文章。结论:作者建议ARSC团队尽可能使用全血、血浆和fda批准的解冻设备。但是,如果这些办法不可行,则应考虑其他办法以满足特派团的需要。在被审查的设备中,真空烹调技术展示了这一应用的潜力。它们重量轻,结构紧凑,用途广泛,能够创建目标温度控制的循环水浴,与其他已确定的现场适应设备相比,它们具有优势。干式解冻系统,如ZipThaw®,也具有节约水和电等资源的优势;然而,需要进一步的研究来验证其在前方作战环境中的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信