Measuring Burnout in Radiologic Science Educators.

IF 0.5 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING
Radiologic Technology Pub Date : 2025-09-01
Kerry Dunn
{"title":"Measuring Burnout in Radiologic Science Educators.","authors":"Kerry Dunn","doi":"","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>To determine whether radiologic science educators are experiencing burnout and to what perceived degree, and to identify the perceived factors most linked to their burnout.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>The Maslach Burnout Toolkit for Educators was used to assess burnout in radiologic science educators according to 3 domains: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal achievement. Convenience sampling included participants from several radiologic science disciplines, including sonography, radiation therapy, radiography, nuclear medicine technology, and cardiac interventional radiography. A mean item score was calculated for each domain, and item scores in each domain were totaled to obtain a sum score. Results from the survey were compared with national educator norms for burnout.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Out of 360 participants, 265 (73.6%) completed the survey. A mean item score of 4.16 was calculated for the first domain, emotional exhaustion, with a sum score of 37.41, indicating a high level of burnout related to emotional exhaustion. Participants demonstrated a moderately high level of burnout associated with depersonalization, with a sum score of 12.09. In contrast, participants indicated a high level of personal accomplishment, with a sum score of 43.60, which corresponds to low levels of burnout.</p><p><strong>Discussion: </strong>Radiologic science educators indicated an overall higher perceived level of burnout when compared with national educator norms. Radiologic science educators exhibited higher levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. The increased level of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization might be due to clinical education requirements, clinical supervision, and rigor of course material. Based on the study data, there is moderate alignment in the areas of workload, control, reward, community, and values. However, there is a strong mismatch in the area of fairness. Based on data analysis, fairness might be linked to increased levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization in burnout.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>The increased workload and work-life imbalance experienced by radiologic science educators might be related partially to technological invasion. The increasing use of technology and connectivity experienced by faculty has resulted in an increasing level of personal invasion by work responsibilities. Common results of increased technological invasion include perception of overload, work-home imbalance, reduced job satisfaction, decreased motivation, and decreased productivity. This invasion also has been shown to cause symptoms of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal achievement, the 3 aspects of burnout.</p>","PeriodicalId":51772,"journal":{"name":"Radiologic Technology","volume":"97 1","pages":"6-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiologic Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: To determine whether radiologic science educators are experiencing burnout and to what perceived degree, and to identify the perceived factors most linked to their burnout.

Methods: The Maslach Burnout Toolkit for Educators was used to assess burnout in radiologic science educators according to 3 domains: emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal achievement. Convenience sampling included participants from several radiologic science disciplines, including sonography, radiation therapy, radiography, nuclear medicine technology, and cardiac interventional radiography. A mean item score was calculated for each domain, and item scores in each domain were totaled to obtain a sum score. Results from the survey were compared with national educator norms for burnout.

Results: Out of 360 participants, 265 (73.6%) completed the survey. A mean item score of 4.16 was calculated for the first domain, emotional exhaustion, with a sum score of 37.41, indicating a high level of burnout related to emotional exhaustion. Participants demonstrated a moderately high level of burnout associated with depersonalization, with a sum score of 12.09. In contrast, participants indicated a high level of personal accomplishment, with a sum score of 43.60, which corresponds to low levels of burnout.

Discussion: Radiologic science educators indicated an overall higher perceived level of burnout when compared with national educator norms. Radiologic science educators exhibited higher levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization. The increased level of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization might be due to clinical education requirements, clinical supervision, and rigor of course material. Based on the study data, there is moderate alignment in the areas of workload, control, reward, community, and values. However, there is a strong mismatch in the area of fairness. Based on data analysis, fairness might be linked to increased levels of emotional exhaustion and depersonalization in burnout.

Conclusion: The increased workload and work-life imbalance experienced by radiologic science educators might be related partially to technological invasion. The increasing use of technology and connectivity experienced by faculty has resulted in an increasing level of personal invasion by work responsibilities. Common results of increased technological invasion include perception of overload, work-home imbalance, reduced job satisfaction, decreased motivation, and decreased productivity. This invasion also has been shown to cause symptoms of emotional exhaustion, depersonalization, and personal achievement, the 3 aspects of burnout.

测量放射科学教育工作者的职业倦怠。
目的:确定放射科学教育工作者是否经历过职业倦怠,以及职业倦怠的感知程度,并确定与职业倦怠最相关的感知因素。方法:采用Maslach教育工作者职业倦怠工具包,从情绪耗竭、人格解体和个人成就三个方面对放射科教育工作者进行职业倦怠评估。方便抽样包括来自几个放射科学学科的参与者,包括超声、放射治疗、放射照相、核医学技术和心脏介入放射照相。计算每个领域的平均项目得分,并将每个领域的项目得分相加,得到一个总和得分。调查结果与国家教育工作者职业倦怠规范进行了比较。结果:360名参与者中,265人(73.6%)完成了调查。第一领域“情绪耗竭”的平均单项得分为4.16分,总分为37.41分,表明情绪耗竭相关的倦怠程度较高。参与者表现出与人格解体相关的中高水平的倦怠,总得分为12.09。相比之下,参与者表现出较高的个人成就感,总分为43.60分,这与低水平的倦怠相对应。讨论:与国家教育工作者相比,放射科学教育工作者总体上表现出更高的倦怠水平。放射科学教育者表现出较高水平的情绪衰竭和人格解体。情绪耗竭和去人格化程度的增加可能是由于临床教育要求、临床监督和严格的课程材料。根据研究数据,在工作量、控制、奖励、社区和价值观方面存在适度的一致性。然而,在公平方面存在严重的不匹配。根据数据分析,公平可能与情绪衰竭和倦怠中人格解体的水平增加有关。结论:放射科学教育工作者工作量增加、工作与生活失衡可能与技术入侵有一定关系。教师越来越多地使用技术和连接,导致工作责任对个人的侵犯程度越来越高。技术入侵增加的常见结果包括超负荷的感觉、工作与家庭的不平衡、工作满意度降低、动机下降和生产力下降。这种入侵也被证明会导致情绪衰竭、人格解体和个人成就的症状,这是倦怠的三个方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
Radiologic Technology
Radiologic Technology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
1.00
自引率
12.50%
发文量
85
期刊介绍: Radiologic Technology is an official scholarly journal of the American Society of Radiologic Technologists. Published continuously since 1929, it circulates to more than 145,000 readers worldwide. This award-winning bimonthly Journal covers all disciplines and specialties within medical imaging, including radiography, mammography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, nuclear medicine imaging, sonography and cardiovascular-interventional radiography. In addition to peer-reviewed research articles, Radi
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信