Development and Validation of an Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Risk Estimation Tool Incorporating Real-World Data and Evidence From Meta-Analyses: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.

IF 2.8 Q2 ONCOLOGY
JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics Pub Date : 2025-09-01 Epub Date: 2025-09-15 DOI:10.1200/CCI-25-00182
Yasuaki Sagara, Atsushi Yoshida, Yuri Kimura, Makoto Ishitobi, Yuka Ono, Yuko Takahashi, Takahiro Tsukioki, Koji Takada, Yuri Ito, Tomo Osako, Takehiko Sakai
{"title":"Development and Validation of an Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Risk Estimation Tool Incorporating Real-World Data and Evidence From Meta-Analyses: A Retrospective Multicenter Cohort Study.","authors":"Yasuaki Sagara, Atsushi Yoshida, Yuri Kimura, Makoto Ishitobi, Yuka Ono, Yuko Takahashi, Takahiro Tsukioki, Koji Takada, Yuri Ito, Tomo Osako, Takehiko Sakai","doi":"10.1200/CCI-25-00182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) remains a critical concern for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Reliable risk estimation tools for IBTR risk can support personalized surgical and adjuvant treatment decisions, especially in the era of evolving systemic therapies. We aimed to develop and validate models to estimate IBTR risk.</p><p><strong>Patients and methods: </strong>This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 8,938 women who underwent partial mastectomy for invasive breast cancer between 2008 and 2017. Prediction models were developed using Cox proportional hazards regression and validated via bootstrap resampling. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index, Brier scores, calibration plots, and goodness-of-fit tests.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>During a median follow-up of 9.0 years (IQR, 6.6-10.9), IBTR occurred in 320 patients (3.6%). The initial model, based on variables from Sanghani et al, achieved a Harrell's C-index of 0.74. Incorporating hormonal receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy as predictors reduced the C-index to 0.65, despite their clinical relevance. Importantly, the inclusion of these factors improved calibration, demonstrating better alignment between predicted and observed IBTR probabilities. Although the hazard ratios (HRs) for radiotherapy aligned with the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group meta-analyses (MA), those for chemotherapy and endocrine therapy showed slight differences. Therefore, HRs from the MA were used to represent treatment effects in our model.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>We have developed and internally validated a new risk estimation model for IBTR using Cox regression and bootstrap methods. A Web-based risk estimation tool is now available to facilitate individualized risk assessment and treatment planning.</p>","PeriodicalId":51626,"journal":{"name":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","volume":"9 ","pages":"e2500182"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC12442782/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JCO Clinical Cancer Informatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/CCI-25-00182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2025/9/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) remains a critical concern for patients undergoing breast-conserving surgery (BCS). Reliable risk estimation tools for IBTR risk can support personalized surgical and adjuvant treatment decisions, especially in the era of evolving systemic therapies. We aimed to develop and validate models to estimate IBTR risk.

Patients and methods: This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 8,938 women who underwent partial mastectomy for invasive breast cancer between 2008 and 2017. Prediction models were developed using Cox proportional hazards regression and validated via bootstrap resampling. Model performance was assessed using Harrell's C-index, Brier scores, calibration plots, and goodness-of-fit tests.

Results: During a median follow-up of 9.0 years (IQR, 6.6-10.9), IBTR occurred in 320 patients (3.6%). The initial model, based on variables from Sanghani et al, achieved a Harrell's C-index of 0.74. Incorporating hormonal receptor status, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 status, radiotherapy, and targeted therapy as predictors reduced the C-index to 0.65, despite their clinical relevance. Importantly, the inclusion of these factors improved calibration, demonstrating better alignment between predicted and observed IBTR probabilities. Although the hazard ratios (HRs) for radiotherapy aligned with the Early Breast Cancer Trialists' Collaborative Group meta-analyses (MA), those for chemotherapy and endocrine therapy showed slight differences. Therefore, HRs from the MA were used to represent treatment effects in our model.

Conclusion: We have developed and internally validated a new risk estimation model for IBTR using Cox regression and bootstrap methods. A Web-based risk estimation tool is now available to facilitate individualized risk assessment and treatment planning.

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

Abstract Image

基于真实世界数据和meta分析证据的同侧乳腺肿瘤复发风险评估工具的开发和验证:一项回顾性多中心队列研究。
目的:同侧乳房肿瘤复发(IBTR)仍然是接受保乳手术(BCS)患者的一个关键问题。可靠的IBTR风险评估工具可以支持个性化的手术和辅助治疗决策,特别是在不断发展的全身治疗时代。我们的目标是开发和验证评估IBTR风险的模型。患者和方法:这项多中心回顾性队列研究纳入了8,938名在2008年至2017年期间因浸润性乳腺癌接受部分乳房切除术的女性。采用Cox比例风险回归建立预测模型,并通过自举重采样进行验证。采用Harrell’sc指数、Brier评分、校准图和拟合优度检验评估模型性能。结果:在中位随访9.0年(IQR, 6.6-10.9)期间,320例(3.6%)患者发生IBTR。基于Sanghani等人的变量,初始模型的Harrell c指数为0.74。结合激素受体状态、人表皮生长因子受体2状态、放疗和靶向治疗作为预测因子,将c指数降低至0.65,尽管它们具有临床相关性。重要的是,这些因素的纳入改善了校准,证明了预测和观测到的IBTR概率之间更好的一致性。尽管放射治疗的风险比(hr)与早期乳腺癌试验者协作组荟萃分析(MA)一致,但化疗和内分泌治疗的风险比(hr)略有不同。因此,在我们的模型中,我们使用来自MA的hr来表示治疗效果。结论:我们利用Cox回归和bootstrap方法建立了新的IBTR风险估计模型并进行了内部验证。现在有一种基于网络的风险评估工具,可促进个体化风险评估和治疗计划。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.20
自引率
4.80%
发文量
190
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信