Accuracy of 6.5" Beaded Cable Tie, 10" Paracord, and Operator Gestalt in Prehospital Whole Blood Collection Techniques in Filling Donor Blood Bags to Target Volume.

Q3 Medicine
Duncan Mark Carlton, Cole S Jordan, Matthew Christensen, Kevin J Matthews, Blaine Dassero, Gregory J Zarow, Samuel Walther, Alec D Emerling, Russell Wier, Jonathan D Auten
{"title":"Accuracy of 6.5\" Beaded Cable Tie, 10\" Paracord, and Operator Gestalt in Prehospital Whole Blood Collection Techniques in Filling Donor Blood Bags to Target Volume.","authors":"Duncan Mark Carlton, Cole S Jordan, Matthew Christensen, Kevin J Matthews, Blaine Dassero, Gregory J Zarow, Samuel Walther, Alec D Emerling, Russell Wier, Jonathan D Auten","doi":"10.55460/BO33-5BSJ","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Whole blood reduces mortality more effectively than blood component therapy in treating trauma. When cold-stored low-titer Type O whole blood (CS-LTOWB) is not available in austere environments, a walking blood bank (WBB) strategy is employed, with blood drawn from a local, pre-screened donor. Proper blood bag volume is essential for avoiding citrate-related complications; however, the optimal method for determining the correct blood bag volume is unclear.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Novices (n=65) and experts (n=10) at the 1st Marine Division each filled blood bags with the goal of hitting the target volume (450mL ±10%) using the 6.5\" beaded cable tie (BC), 10\" paracord (PC), and operator gestalt (OG) techniques. Filled bags were weighed on a digital scale. Correct fills, underfills, and overfills were assessed using nonparametric statistics at P=.05. Subjective assessments were also collected.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>For novices, OG achieved the highest rate of correct fills (69%), significantly outperforming BC (37%, P=.001) and PC (52%, P=.05). In experts, PC had the highest rate of correct fills (80%), though not significantly different from OG (70%, P=.59) or BC (50%, P=.08). OG was rated highest and was preferred by both groups. BC performed worst in objective and subjective measures for both groups.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>BC performed poorly on all assessments and should be avoided. OG was generally superior to BC and PC, but was still suboptimal, with ~30% incorrect fills study-wide. Present findings demonstrate the need for better methods for determining donor blood bag fill volume to preserve the life of the wounded warfighter in WBB scenarios.</p>","PeriodicalId":53630,"journal":{"name":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of special operations medicine : a peer reviewed journal for SOF medical professionals","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55460/BO33-5BSJ","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Whole blood reduces mortality more effectively than blood component therapy in treating trauma. When cold-stored low-titer Type O whole blood (CS-LTOWB) is not available in austere environments, a walking blood bank (WBB) strategy is employed, with blood drawn from a local, pre-screened donor. Proper blood bag volume is essential for avoiding citrate-related complications; however, the optimal method for determining the correct blood bag volume is unclear.

Methods: Novices (n=65) and experts (n=10) at the 1st Marine Division each filled blood bags with the goal of hitting the target volume (450mL ±10%) using the 6.5" beaded cable tie (BC), 10" paracord (PC), and operator gestalt (OG) techniques. Filled bags were weighed on a digital scale. Correct fills, underfills, and overfills were assessed using nonparametric statistics at P=.05. Subjective assessments were also collected.

Results: For novices, OG achieved the highest rate of correct fills (69%), significantly outperforming BC (37%, P=.001) and PC (52%, P=.05). In experts, PC had the highest rate of correct fills (80%), though not significantly different from OG (70%, P=.59) or BC (50%, P=.08). OG was rated highest and was preferred by both groups. BC performed worst in objective and subjective measures for both groups.

Conclusion: BC performed poorly on all assessments and should be avoided. OG was generally superior to BC and PC, but was still suboptimal, with ~30% incorrect fills study-wide. Present findings demonstrate the need for better methods for determining donor blood bag fill volume to preserve the life of the wounded warfighter in WBB scenarios.

院前全血采集技术中6.5“串珠扎带、10”伞绳和操作人员格式塔的准确性
背景:全血治疗创伤比血液成分治疗更有效地降低死亡率。当在恶劣环境下无法获得冷藏低效价O型全血(CS-LTOWB)时,就采用步行血库(WBB)策略,即从当地预先筛选的献血者处采血。适当的血袋容量对于避免柠檬酸盐相关并发症至关重要;然而,确定正确血袋容量的最佳方法尚不清楚。方法:陆战1师新手(n=65)和专家(n=10)分别使用6.5“珠状扎带(BC)、10”降落伞绳(PC)和操作完形(OG)技术对血袋进行充血,目标是达到目标体积(450mL±10%)。装满的袋子在数字秤上称重。使用非参数统计P= 0.05对正确填充、下填充和过填充进行评估。还收集了主观评价。结果:对于新手,OG的正确填充率最高(69%),显著优于BC (37%, P= 0.001)和PC (52%, P= 0.05)。在专家中,PC的正确填充率最高(80%),尽管与OG (70%, P= 0.59)或BC (50%, P= 0.08)没有显著差异。两组对OG的评价最高,均为首选。BC在两组的客观和主观测量中表现最差。结论:BC在所有评估中表现不佳,应避免。OG总体上优于BC和PC,但仍然不是最优的,在研究范围内有30%的不正确填充。目前的研究结果表明,需要更好的方法来确定供血袋填充量,以保护WBB情况下受伤战士的生命。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 求助全文
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信